To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to establish a grant program to help law enforcement agencies with civilian law enforcement tasks, and for other purposes.
Summary
What This Bill Does
Creates a DOJ grant program for state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to hire retired law enforcement personnel to train civilian employees and perform civilian tasks such as homicide, carjacking, financial-crime, reporting-compliance, camera-footage, crime-scene, forensic, computer-network, IT, and internet work, while barring arrest or force authority and adding disciplinary-record and audit safeguards.
Who Benefits and How
State, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies benefit from DOJ grants that can pay retired law enforcement personnel to train civilian employees and perform specialized civilian tasks. Retired law enforcement personnel benefit from funded roles supporting investigations, footage review, forensic analysis, financial-crime work, and technology expertise. Civilian police employees benefit from training that lets sworn officers shift non-arrest tasks to trained civilians. Communities with homicide, carjacking, cyber, and financial-crime workloads benefit if agencies can expand investigative capacity without giving civilians arrest or force authority.
Who Bears the Burden and How
DOJ grant staff must compare awards for duplication, report duplicate grants, certify annual audit completion and mandatory exclusions, and prioritize entities without recent unresolved audit findings. DOJ Inspector General auditors must audit grantees every fiscal year to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse. Grant recipients must certify retired personnel have current training or continuing education, search the National Decertification Index or request prior personnel records, and have the highest-ranking officer review misconduct findings before hiring. Recipients with unresolved audit findings lose grant eligibility for two fiscal years.
Key Provisions
- Defines civilian law enforcement tasks to include homicide, carjacking, financial-crime, reporting-compliance, camera-footage, crime-scene, forensic, computer-network, IT, and internet support.
- Bars civilian law enforcement tasks from including arrest authority or force under color of law.
- Authorizes DOJ grants for eligible state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to hire retired personnel.
- Requires retired personnel funded by grants to have current training or participate in continuing education.
- Requires grantees to check the National Decertification Index or prior personnel records and review misconduct findings before hiring.
- Requires DOJ Inspector General audits, two-year exclusions for unresolved audit findings, clean-audit grant priority, annual Attorney General certifications, and duplicate-grant reports.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates a DOJ grant program for state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to hire retired law enforcement personnel to train civilian employees and perform civilian tasks such as homicide, carjacking, financial-crime, reporting-compliance, camera-footage, crime-scene, forensic, computer-network, IT, and internet work, while barring arrest or force authority and adding disciplinary-record and audit safeguards.
Key Policy Areas
Law Enforcement, Grants, Public Safety, DOJ Oversight
Primary Purpose
Creates a DOJ grant program for state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to hire retired law enforcement personnel to train civilian employees and perform civilian tasks such as homicide, carjacking, financial-crime, reporting-compliance, camera-footage, crime-scene, forensic, computer-network, IT, and internet work, while barring arrest or force authority and adding disciplinary-record and audit safeguards.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- State, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies benefit from DOJ grants that can pay retired law enforcement personnel to train civilian employees and perform specialized civilian tasks
- Retired law enforcement personnel benefit from funded roles supporting investigations, footage review, forensic analysis, financial-crime work, and technology expertise
- Civilian police employees benefit from training that lets sworn officers shift non-arrest tasks to trained civilians
- Communities with homicide, carjacking, cyber, and financial-crime workloads benefit if agencies can expand investigative capacity without giving civilians arrest or force authority
Identified Costs
- DOJ grant staff must compare awards for duplication, report duplicate grants, certify annual audit completion and mandatory exclusions, and prioritize entities without recent unresolved audit findings
- DOJ Inspector General auditors must audit grantees every fiscal year to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse
- Grant recipients must certify retired personnel have current training or continuing education, search the National Decertification Index or request prior personnel records, and have the highest-ranking officer review misconduct findings before hiring
- Recipients with unresolved audit findings lose grant eligibility for two fiscal years
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedReported by Mr. Grassley, with an amendment
Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following …
Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Durbin, and Ms. …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Civilian police employees, DOJ Inspector General, DOJ grant staff
Positive-direction: Civilian police employees, Local law enforcement agencies, Retired law enforcement personnel, State law enforcement agencies
Negative-direction: DOJ Inspector General, DOJ grant staff, Grant recipients with unresolved audits, Law enforcement grant applicants, Police chiefs
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "attorney_general"
- → Attorney General
- "inspector_general"
- → DOJ Inspector General
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
Specified investigative, analytical, reporting, forensic, technology, and support tasks that exclude arrest or use-of-force authority.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology