S1524-118

Reported

To ensure that whistleblowers, including contractors, are protected from retaliation when a Federal employee orders a reprisal, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced May 10, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill strengthens protections for people who report fraud, waste, or abuse in federal contracts and grants. It expands the definition of who is protected to include not just employees but also contractors, subcontractors, grantees, and anyone working on federal projects. It also protects workers who refuse to follow illegal orders.

Who Benefits and How

Whistleblowers and employees of federal contractors benefit by gaining stronger legal protections against retaliation. Workers can now refuse illegal orders without fear of being fired. Predispute arbitration agreements that would block whistleblower claims are voided, giving workers access to courts. State and local governments receiving federal grants also gain protections for their employees.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal contractors, subcontractors, and grantees face new restrictions on retaliating against whistleblowers. They can no longer enforce arbitration clauses to block whistleblower claims. Executive branch officials face potential disciplinary action if they request that contractors retaliate against whistleblowers. Defense and civilian agencies must investigate complaints and may need to provide remedies.

Key Provisions

  • Expands 'protected individual' definition to include contractors, subcontractors, grantees, subgrantees, and their employees
  • Protects workers who refuse orders that would violate law, rule, or regulation
  • Voids predispute arbitration agreements for whistleblower disputes
  • Prohibits executive branch officials from requesting contractor reprisals against whistleblowers
  • Adds disciplinary action for officials who request reprisals

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Expands whistleblower protections for federal contractors, subcontractors, grantees, and their employees by strengthening anti-retaliation provisions and voiding predispute arbitration agreements

Key Policy Areas

Labor & Employment, Government Contracting, Defense, Federal Grants

Primary Purpose

Expands whistleblower protections for federal contractors, subcontractors, grantees, and their employees by strengthening anti-retaliation provisions and voiding predispute arbitration agreements

Policy Domains

Labor & Employment Government Contracting Defense Federal Grants

Section 2 - Defense Contractor Whistleblower Protections

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Defense contractor employees
  • Defense subcontractor employees
  • Grantees of DOD and NASA
  • Whistleblowers reporting fraud or safety issues
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Defense contractors
  • Defense subcontractors
  • Executive branch officials
  • Arbitration service providers
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Section 3 - Non-Defense Contractor Whistleblower Protections

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Federal contractor employees
  • Federal grantee employees
  • State and local government employees on federal projects
  • Whistleblowers
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Federal contractors
  • Federal grantees
  • Executive branch officials
  • Arbitration service providers
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 29, 2024

Reported by Mr. Peters, with an amendment

May 10, 2023

Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Braun) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Defense
6 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive -2 negative

Defense contractor employees, Defense contractors, Defense subcontractor employees

Positive-direction: Defense contractor employees, Defense subcontractor employees

Negative-direction: Defense contractors

Federal Grantees
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

DOD and NASA grantee employees, Federal grantee employees

Professional Services
4 mentions across 4 clauses
-4 negative

Arbitration service providers

Government
4 mentions across 4 clauses
-4 negative

Executive branch officials, Executive branch officials overseeing defense contracts

Government Contractors
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative

Federal contractor employees, Federal contractors

Positive-direction: Federal contractor employees

Negative-direction: Federal contractors

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

State and local government employees on federal projects

5/6
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Labor & Employment Government Contracting
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Defense
"the_inspector_general"
→ Inspector General of the Department of Defense
Domains
Federal Grants Labor & Employment Government Contracting
Actor Mappings
"the_inspector_general"
→ Inspector General of the relevant agency

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"protected individual" §section_2

A contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee of the Federal Government (including state governments, Indian tribes, territories), or an employee of such entities

"contract" §section_3

Includes any Federal award as defined in section 2(a) of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology