S140-119

Reported

Wildfire Prevention Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jan 16, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill aims to reduce wildfire risk on federal lands by mandating increased vegetation management activities. It requires the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to progressively increase mechanical thinning and prescribed burns by 40% above baseline levels by 2029, while streamlining environmental review processes for these activities.

Who Benefits and How

Timber and logging companies benefit from expanded harvesting opportunities through higher timber sale thresholds (raised from $10,000 to $55,000) and streamlined permitting. Electric utilities gain easier vegetation management rights along power line corridors on federal land. Livestock grazing operators may see expanded opportunities to use grazing as a wildfire reduction tool. Technology companies developing wildfire prevention, detection, and mitigation technologies can participate in a new federal testbed pilot program.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Environmental advocacy groups face reduced opportunities for environmental review as the bill creates new categorical exclusions for hazard tree removal and exempts certain agency goal-setting from NEPA requirements. Federal agencies (Forest Service, BLM) face new mandatory reporting requirements and must meet progressively higher treatment targets. Taxpayers fund expanded federal land management activities.

Key Provisions

  • Mandates 40% increase in mechanical thinning and prescribed fire treatments on federal lands by 2029
  • Creates categorical exclusion for removing hazard trees within 300 feet of roads and in recreation areas
  • Raises timber sale threshold from $10,000 to $55,000 for oral auction requirement
  • Establishes 7-year public-private wildfire technology testbed pilot program
  • Requires agencies to use streamlined environmental review authorities on high-risk lands

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Accelerates wildfire prevention on federal lands by requiring increased mechanical thinning and prescribed fire treatments, streamlining environmental review processes, and establishing new technology partnerships.

Key Policy Areas

Public Lands, Environment, Forestry, Energy, Agriculture

Primary Purpose

Accelerates wildfire prevention on federal lands by requiring increased mechanical thinning and prescribed fire treatments, streamlining environmental review processes, and establishing new technology partnerships.

Policy Domains

Public Lands Environment Forestry Energy Agriculture

Title I - Accelerating Forest Treatments

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Timber companies
  • Logging contractors
  • Communities in wildland-urban interface
  • Rural municipalities
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Environmental advocacy groups
  • Forest Service
  • Bureau of Land Management
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Title II - Forest Management

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Electric utilities
  • Timber purchasers
  • Logging companies
  • Livestock grazing operators
  • Local governments
  • Indian Tribes
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Environmental advocacy groups
  • Forest Service
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Title III - Additional Provisions

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Technology companies
  • Federal land managers
  • Private wildfire technology developers
  • Universities
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Environmental advocacy groups
  • Federal agencies
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 10, 2026

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported …

Dec 2, 2025

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, …

Jan 16, 2025

Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Daines, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Sheehy, …

Jan 16, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and …

Jan 16, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
20 mentions across 11 clauses
+5 positive -13 negative ?2 uncertain

Bureau of Land Management, Congressional oversight committees, Department of the Interior

Forest Service faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Congressional oversight committees, Department of the Interior, Indian Tribes

Negative-direction: Bureau of Land Management, Federal land management agencies

General Public
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

Communities in wildland-urban interface, Communities near power lines, General public and oversight groups

Civic Organizations
4 mentions across 4 clauses
-4 negative

Environmental advocacy groups, Environmental litigation groups

Fishing & Forestry
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Logging and tree removal contractors, Timber and logging companies

Utilities
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Electric utilities operating on federal lands

Technology
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

AI and quantum computing companies, Private technology companies developing wildfire technologies

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Local governments near federal lands

Agriculture
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Livestock grazing operators on federal lands

12/15
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Lands
Actor Mappings
"secretary_concerned"
→ Secretary of Agriculture (for National Forest System land) or Secretary of Interior (for BLM land)
Domains
Forestry Environment Public Lands
Actor Mappings
"secretary_concerned"
→ Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) or Secretary of Interior (BLM)
"secretary_of_agriculture"
→ Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service
Domains
Forestry Energy Agriculture
Actor Mappings
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Agriculture
"secretary_concerned"
→ Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) or Secretary of Interior (BLM)
Domains
Public Lands Technology
Actor Mappings
"secretaries"
→ Secretary of Agriculture and Secretary of Interior, acting jointly
"secretary_concerned"
→ Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) or Secretary of Interior (BLM)

Note: 'Secretary concerned' refers to either Secretary of Agriculture or Secretary of Interior depending on whether the land is National Forest System or BLM land

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

5 terms
"Federal land" §2(1)

Land of the National Forest System; and public lands administered by the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management

"hazardous fuels reduction activity" §2(2)

Any vegetation management activity to reduce the risk of wildfire, including mechanical treatments and prescribed burning (excludes awarding contracts)

"Secretary concerned" §2(4)

Secretary of Agriculture (through Forest Service Chief) for National Forest System land; Secretary of Interior (through BLM Director) for BLM land

"wildland-urban interface" §2(5)

As defined in section 101 of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003

"high-priority hazard tree" §203(a)(1)

A standing tree presenting visible hazard to people or property due to deterioration, damage, direction or lean; highly likely to fail and cause injury; within 300 feet of certain roads, along trails, or in developed recreation sites

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology