To address the needs of individuals with disabilities within the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires amendments to the Clery Act Section 485(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, reporting requirements, and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Education, Criminal Justice, and Science & Space.
Who Benefits and How
The main beneficiaries are the people, organizations, or agencies identified in the bill's substantive provisions.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties, Researchers and scientific institutions affected by the bill would take on compliance duties, and Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires amendments to the Clery Act Section 485(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires amendments to the Clery Act Section 485(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Education, Criminal Justice, Science & Space
Primary Purpose
The bill requires amendments to the Clery Act Section 485(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Researchers and scientific institutions affected by the bill
- Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
- Educational institutions and students affected by the bill
- Disaster response agencies and disaster-affected communities
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Casey (for himself, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Murphy, Ms. Klobuchar, …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology