HRES232-119

In Committee

Calling on the Government of Panama to expel officials and interests of the People’s Republic of China and terminate Chinese management of key Panamanian ports.

119th Congress Introduced Mar 21, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

A House resolution expressing concern about Chinese presence in Panamanian ports and calling on Panama to expel Chinese interests from strategic infrastructure and reaffirm canal neutrality.

Who Benefits and How

US national security interests benefit from reduced Chinese influence near Panama Canal. Panama gains congressional support for resisting Chinese pressure.

Who Bears the Burden and How

This non-binding resolution calls on Panama to take action. Chinese companies operating in Panama would be affected.

Key Provisions

  • Expresses concern about Chinese influence in Panama Canal ports
  • Calls on Panama to reaffirm canal neutrality
  • Urges Panama to expel Chinese officials from strategic facilities
  • References ports of Balboa and Cristobal specifically

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Calls on Panama to expel Chinese officials and interests from strategic infrastructure including Panama Canal ports

Who Benefits

  • US national security
  • Panama sovereignty

Who Bears Costs

  • Chinese companies in Panama

Key Policy Areas

Foreign Affairs, China Policy, Latin America, National Security

Primary Purpose

Calls on Panama to expel Chinese officials and interests from strategic infrastructure including Panama Canal ports

Policy Domains

Foreign Affairs China Policy Latin America National Security

Legislative Strategy

"Counter Chinese influence in Western Hemisphere strategic infrastructure"

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 21, 2025

Mr. Arrington (for himself and Mr. Burchett) submitted the following …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Foreign Affairs National Security

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology