HR978-118

Introduced

To require the head of each executive agency to relocate such agency outside of the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Feb 10, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill requires relocation of agency headquarters Section 72 of title 4, United States Code, is repealed. It relies on definition changes, reporting requirements, and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are National Security and Defense.

Who Benefits and How

National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Requires relocation of agency headquarters Section 72 of title 4, United States Code, is repealed.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill requires relocation of agency headquarters Section 72 of title 4, United States Code, is repealed.

Key Policy Areas

National Security, Defense

Primary Purpose

The bill requires relocation of agency headquarters Section 72 of title 4, United States Code, is repealed.

Policy Domains

National Security Defense

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill:
Identified Costs
  • Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause:

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 10, 2023

Mr. Davidson introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
National Security Defense

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology