HR896-119

Introduced

To direct the Secretary of Education to award grants to State educational agencies for the purpose of implementing, administering, and evaluating programs that provide tutoring to students in elementary and secondary schools, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 31, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

The Expanding Access to High-Impact Tutoring Act of 2025 directs the Secretary of Education to create a grant program that distributes 80% of funding to state educational agencies, which then award competitive subgrants to local school districts for tutoring programs. The remaining funds support an Advisory Board (5%), state-level evaluation (5%), and a nationwide tutoring workforce initiative (10%). Tutoring must occur during the school day, at least 30 minutes per session for at least 3 days per week, with a maximum 3-to-1 student-to-tutor ratio. Tutors must be compensated licensed teachers, paraprofessionals, or volunteers from nonprofit service organizations. The bill prioritizes schools serving Title I students and those with COVID-era learning loss. An Advisory Board of at least 5 experts oversees program quality, approves plans, and sets standards. The bill also includes collective bargaining protections requiring union agreement before implementation affects employment conditions. Authorized for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Establishes a federal grant program to fund high-impact tutoring in K-12 schools, with an Advisory Board, nationwide workforce development, and evaluation requirements

Who Benefits

  • K-12 students (especially Title I eligible)
  • Teachers and paraprofessionals (tutoring workforce)
  • Nonprofit tutoring providers

Who Bears Costs

  • Federal budget (such sums as necessary FY2026-2030)
  • Local educational agencies (compliance and reporting)
  • State educational agencies (administration)

Key Policy Areas

Education, Workforce Development

Primary Purpose

Establishes a federal grant program to fund high-impact tutoring in K-12 schools, with an Advisory Board, nationwide workforce development, and evaluation requirements

Policy Domains

Education Workforce Development

Legislative Strategy

"Create a structured federal-to-state-to-local grant pipeline for evidence-based tutoring, with central Advisory Board oversight, workforce building, and collective bargaining protections"

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 31, 2025

Ms. Sherrill (for herself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. David Scott of …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Education
14 mentions across 8 clauses
+10 positive -2 negative ~2 mixed

Institutions of higher education, K-12 students in Title I schools, K-12 students receiving tutoring

Local educational agencies faces effects in multiple directions

Nonprofits
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

AmeriCorps and nonprofit service organizations, Nonprofit tutoring providers

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Department of Education, Federal budget, State and local workforce boards

Positive-direction: State and local workforce boards

Negative-direction: Department of Education, Federal budget

Labor
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Educator unions, Educator unions and labor organizations, Prospective tutors (community members, school staff)

8/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Education
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Education
"advisory_board"
→ Advisory Board established within the Department of Education

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"program administrator" §9

Individual from SEA or LEA who ensures tutoring program meets requirements, manages training, and conducts observations

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology