To extend Federal Pell Grant eligibility of certain short-term programs.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill creates extending Federal Pell Grant eligibility of certain short-term programs Section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, appropriations, grants, and reporting requirements. The main policy areas are Education, Finance, and Environment.
Who Benefits and How
Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, Educational institutions and students affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, and Businesses and employers affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Creates extending Federal Pell Grant eligibility of certain short-term programs Section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill creates extending Federal Pell Grant eligibility of certain short-term programs Section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Education, Finance, Environment
Primary Purpose
The bill creates extending Federal Pell Grant eligibility of certain short-term programs Section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill
- Educational institutions and students affected by the bill
- Businesses and employers affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Johnson of Ohio (for himself, Ms. Blunt Rochester, Mr. …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology