Closing the College Hunger Gap Act
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Information on SNAP eligibility Section 483 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1090) is amended by adding at the end the following: For each year for which. It relies on compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Education.
Who Benefits and How
The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.
Who Bears the Burden and How
No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.
Key Provisions
- Adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Information on SNAP eligibility Section 483 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1090) is amended by adding at the end the following: For each year for which...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Information on SNAP eligibility Section 483 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1090) is amended by adding at the end the following: For each year for which.
Key Policy Areas
Education
Primary Purpose
The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Information on SNAP eligibility Section 483 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1090) is amended by adding at the end the following: For each year for which.
Policy Domains
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMrs. Hayes (for herself, Ms. Adams, Mr. Davis of Illinois, …
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Introduced in House
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "secretary_of_education"
- → Secretary of Education
- "secretary_of_agriculture"
- → Secretary of Agriculture
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology