HR7736-119

In Committee

RELIEF Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 26, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The RELIEF Act requires the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to refund all tariffs and other duties collected on or after January 1, 2025 when those charges were imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Within 90 days after enactment, CBP must take the steps needed to liquidate or reliquidate every covered entry and pay the refund to the importer of record.

The command applies notwithstanding the usual finality rule in section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law. An importer does not need to submit an application or customs protest. CBP must use information already available to calculate and disburse what is owed. For this purpose, an entry includes a withdrawal from a customs warehouse for consumption.

The bill is retrospective financial relief. It does not expressly invalidate the underlying emergency declaration, prohibit future IEEPA tariffs, refund duties imposed under a different statute, direct importers to pass savings to customers, or compensate a party other than the importer of record. The amount and distribution of refunds depend on actual collections and customs records.

Who Benefits and How

Importers of record receive automatic refunds without filing protests. Small businesses, retailers, and manufacturers that paid covered duties regain cash and may reduce inventory or input costs. Customs lawyers and internal trade teams avoid some case-by-case protest work. Downstream consumers may benefit if importers pass through the refunds or lower future prices, although the bill does not require that result.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Treasury accounts lose previously collected tariff revenue and must finance disbursements. CBP staff must identify all covered entries, reopen final liquidations, calculate amounts, correct importer records, and issue refunds within 90 days. Domestic producers that benefited from tariff protection may face renewed import competition. Customs brokers or protest specialists may lose paid refund work because applications are unnecessary, and federal budget planners face uncertain aggregate exposure.

Key Provisions

  • Requires refunds of covered IEEPA tariffs collected from January 1, 2025.
  • Directs CBP to liquidate or reliquidate every covered entry.
  • Requires payment to the importer of record within a 90-day process.
  • Overrides the ordinary customs-finality rule and conflicting law.
  • Eliminates any importer application or protest requirement.
  • Requires CBP to use information already available.
  • Expands entry to include warehouse withdrawals for consumption.
  • Limits refunds to tariffs or duties imposed under IEEPA.
  • Provides no mandatory pass-through from importers to consumers.
  • Preserves the possibility of future duties not covered by the refund command.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires Customs and Border Protection within 90 days to liquidate or reliquidate covered entries and automatically refund to importers of record every tariff or duty collected on or after January 1, 2025 under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Key Policy Areas

Emergency Tariffs, Customs Refunds, Import Trade, Federal Revenue, Customs Administration

Primary Purpose

Requires Customs and Border Protection within 90 days to liquidate or reliquidate covered entries and automatically refund to importers of record every tariff or duty collected on or after January 1, 2025 under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Policy Domains

Emergency Tariffs Customs Refunds Import Trade Federal Revenue Customs Administration

Section 2 automatic liquidation and refund of IEEPA duties

Identified Gains
  • Importers of record receiving automatic refunds
  • Small businesses that paid covered duties
  • Retailers importing covered merchandise
  • Manufacturers importing covered components
  • Trade-compliance teams avoiding protest filings
  • Consumers receiving any passed-through savings
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Retailers importing covered merchandise:
Small businesses that paid covered duties:
Manufacturers importing covered components:
Consumers receiving any passed-through savings:
Importers of record receiving automatic refunds:
Trade-compliance teams avoiding protest filings:
Identified Costs
  • Treasury accounts returning tariff revenue
  • CBP staff reliquidating covered entries
  • Customs payment staff issuing refunds
  • Domestic producers losing tariff protection
  • Manufacturers competing with covered imports
  • Customs protest specialists losing filing work
  • Federal budget planners estimating refund exposure
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Customs payment staff issuing refunds:
CBP staff reliquidating covered entries:
Treasury accounts returning tariff revenue:
Domestic producers losing tariff protection:
Manufacturers competing with covered imports:
Customs protest specialists losing filing work:
Federal budget planners estimating refund exposure:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 26, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Feb 26, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 26, 2026

Mr. Horsford (for himself, Ms. Bynum, Mr. Neal, Mr. Thompson …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
5 mentions across 1 clause
-5 negative

CBP customs-data teams, CBP entry-reliquidation staff, Customs refund-payment staff

Trade
3 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive ~1 mixed

Importers of record, Importers with incomplete customs records, Trade-compliance teams

Manufacturing
3 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -2 negative

Domestic producers protected by IEEPA tariffs, Manufacturers competing with covered imports, Manufacturers importing covered components

Positive-direction: Manufacturers importing covered components

Negative-direction: Domestic producers protected by IEEPA tariffs, Manufacturers competing with covered imports

Small Business
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Small-business importers

Retail
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Retailers importing covered merchandise

Consumers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Consumers receiving passed-through savings

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Customs protest specialists

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Emergency Tariffs Customs Refunds Import Trade Federal Revenue Customs Administration
Actor Mappings
"recipient"
→ Importer of record that paid a covered IEEPA duty
"competitor"
→ Domestic producer protected by the covered tariffs
"fiscal_actor"
→ Treasury account holding collected tariff revenue
"intermediary"
→ Customs broker handling covered entries
"administrator"
→ Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Note: {'scope_ids': ['ieepa_tariff_refunds'], 'description': 'The bill refunds specified past collections to importers of record; it does not expressly repeal IEEPA authority, bar future emergency duties, reach tariffs imposed under another statute, or require consumer pass-through.'}

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"entry" §entry

A customs entry, expressly including a withdrawal from warehouse for consumption for purposes of the refund command.

"covered IEEPA amount" §covered_amount

A tariff or other duty imposed under IEEPA and collected on or after January 1, 2025.

"automatic refund" §automatic_refund

A payment calculated from CBP-held information without requiring an importer application or protest.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology