HR7548-119

In Committee

SCAM Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 12, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill targets scam advertising on public-facing online platforms, including social media, social networks, virtual reality environments, and services built around user-generated content. Paid ads that are fraudulent or deceptive become unlawful when the platform accepted payment and failed to take reasonable preventive steps. Platforms must verify advertiser legal identity and physical location, collect sufficient contact information, prevent false or stolen identities, maintain impersonation detection and mitigation, run automated and manual fraud-detection systems, provide a user reporting tool, investigate reports within 72 hours, notify reporters within 24 hours after investigations, and remove violating ads within 24 hours after a violation determination. FTC-approved detection programs can create a compliance presumption, but the FTC can still enforce individual cases. Violations are treated as FTC unfair or deceptive acts; state attorneys general can sue for injunctions, compliance, damages, restitution, and other relief; injured people can sue for injunctions, actual damages, restitution, penalties, attorney fees, and up to treble damages for willful or knowing violations. Section 230(c)(1) does not apply to violations, while Section 230(c)(2) remains unaffected. FTC must issue rules within one year, review them annually, and report within nine months on additional online scam and payment-fraud authority.

Who Benefits and How

Consumers harmed by scam ads, older adults targeted by fraud, legitimate businesses impersonated online, state attorneys general, and the FTC benefit from verification duties, reporting tools, takedown timelines, enforcement authority, and private remedies.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Online platforms, paid advertisers, social media services, virtual reality platforms, and platform compliance teams must build advertiser-verification, fraud-detection, reporting, investigation, notification, removal, and recordkeeping processes. The FTC must write rules, review them annually, enforce violations, and report on regulatory gaps.

Key Provisions

  • Requires online platforms that accept paid ads to verify advertiser identity, location, legal existence, and contact information.
  • Requires impersonation detection, automated and manual fraud-detection systems, user reporting tools, 72-hour investigations, and 24-hour removal after violation findings.
  • Creates FTC enforcement, state attorney general enforcement, and private civil actions with attorney fees and possible treble damages.
  • Blocks Section 230(c)(1) immunity for violations while preserving Section 230(c)(2) protections and state or local law.
  • Directs FTC rulemaking within one year and a nine-month report on online scams involving financial transactions.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates FTC-enforced liability for paid fraudulent or deceptive online advertisements when platforms fail to use reasonable advertiser verification, impersonation detection, reporting, investigation, and removal procedures.

Key Policy Areas

Consumer Protection, Technology, Advertising, Civil Litigation

Primary Purpose

Creates FTC-enforced liability for paid fraudulent or deceptive online advertisements when platforms fail to use reasonable advertiser verification, impersonation detection, reporting, investigation, and removal procedures.

Policy Domains

Consumer Protection Technology Advertising Civil Litigation

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Consumer fraud victims
  • Older adult consumers
  • Legitimate businesses impersonated online
  • State attorney general offices
  • FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Older adult consumers: , , ,
Consumer fraud victims: , , ,
State attorney general offices: , , ,
FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection: , , ,
Legitimate businesses impersonated online: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Social media companies
  • Paid advertisers
  • Advertising compliance departments
  • Platform trust and safety teams
  • FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection
  • Virtual reality platform operators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Paid advertisers: , , ,
Social media companies: , , ,
Platform trust and safety teams: , , ,
FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection: , , ,
Advertising compliance departments: , , ,
Virtual reality platform operators: , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 12, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Feb 12, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 12, 2026

Mr. Meuser (for himself and Mr. Correa) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
5 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -3 negative

Congressional banking committees, Federal Trade Commission, State attorneys general

Positive-direction: Congressional banking committees, State attorneys general

Negative-direction: Federal Trade Commission

Technology
4 mentions across 3 clauses
-4 negative

Online platforms, Social media services

Consumers
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Consumers harmed by payment scams, Consumers harmed by scam ads

Financial Services
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Financial institutions

Advertising
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Paid advertisers

Small Business
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Legitimate businesses impersonated online

4/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Consumer Protection Technology Advertising Civil Litigation
Actor Mappings
"Commission"
→ Federal Trade Commission

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology