HR7288-119

In Committee

Western South Dakota Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 30, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Western South Dakota Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act directs the Secretary, working with the non-federal project entity, to study a proposed rural water supply project. After the study, the Secretary must publish a feasibility report recommending whether Congress should authorize construction and what non-federal construction share should apply. That share must be at least 25 percent and based on the project entity's ability to pay allocated construction, operations, maintenance, and replacement costs. The federal share of study costs is capped at 50 percent, the bill authorizes $10 million, and the authority expires 10 years after enactment.

Who Benefits and How

Western South Dakota rural water users benefit if the study advances a new supply project that could improve long-term drinking-water reliability. The non-federal project entity benefits from federal feasibility expertise and up to half of the study cost covered federally. State, Tribal, regional, and local water authorities benefit from required consultation during the study and report. Congressional natural-resources committees benefit from a public recommendation before deciding whether to authorize construction.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Bureau of Reclamation and Interior Department must coordinate the feasibility study, consult federal, State, Tribal, regional, and local authorities, negotiate a cost-sharing or financial-assistance agreement, publish the report and study documents, and analyze ability to pay. The non-federal project entity must share study costs and would face at least 25 percent of construction costs if the project is authorized. Federal taxpayers bear up to $10 million in authorized study exposure.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes a feasibility study for a Western South Dakota rural water supply project.
  • Requires a public report recommending whether construction should be authorized and what non-federal construction share should apply.
  • Provides a federal study cost share capped at 50 percent and authorizes $10 million for the study.
  • Requires consultation with federal, State, Tribal, regional, and local authorities and sunsets the study authority after 10 years.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Authorizes a $10 million, 10-year feasibility-study process for a Western South Dakota rural water supply project, including a public construction recommendation, at least 25 percent non-federal construction share, 50 percent federal study cap, and capability-to-pay analysis.

Key Policy Areas

Water Infrastructure, Rural Development, Government

Primary Purpose

Authorizes a $10 million, 10-year feasibility-study process for a Western South Dakota rural water supply project, including a public construction recommendation, at least 25 percent non-federal construction share, 50 percent federal study cap, and capability-to-pay analysis.

Policy Domains

Water Infrastructure Rural Development Government

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Western South Dakota rural water users
  • Non-federal project entity
  • State water authorities
  • Tribal water authorities
  • Congressional natural-resources committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State water authorities:
Tribal water authorities:
Non-federal project entity:
Western South Dakota rural water users:
Congressional natural-resources committees:
Identified Costs
  • Bureau of Reclamation
  • Interior Department
  • Non-federal project entity
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers:
Interior Department:
Bureau of Reclamation:
Non-federal project entity:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 16, 2026

Subcommittee Hearings Held

Apr 9, 2026

Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries.

Jan 30, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Jan 30, 2026

Introduced in House

Jan 30, 2026

Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Water Infrastructure
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Non-federal project entity, Western South Dakota rural water users

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

State water authorities

Tribal Nations
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Tribal water authorities

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Bureau of Reclamation

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

1/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Water Infrastructure Rural Development Government

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology