To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to revoke the tax-exempt status of organizations that provide, or provide funding for, abortion.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill amends Internal Revenue Code section 501 to deny tax exemption to any organization that provides or provides funding for abortion, and it also says such an organization is not treated as described in section 170(c), which affects charitable contribution treatment. The bill defines abortion broadly as using or prescribing an instrument, medicine, drug, substance, or device to intentionally kill an unborn child or intentionally terminate a known pregnancy, except when the intent after viability is live birth and preserving the born child's life and health, or removing a dead unborn child. The revocation rule does not apply when an abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother or when the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. The rule applies to taxable years beginning after enactment.
Who Benefits and How
Anti-abortion organizations and donors who oppose tax support for abortion providers benefit because the bill removes federal tax-exempt and charitable status from organizations that provide or fund abortion outside the stated exceptions. Federal revenue collections may benefit if affected organizations become taxable or lose deductible contribution treatment. Competing nonprofits that do not provide or fund abortion may benefit comparatively because their tax-exempt status remains intact.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Abortion providers, abortion funds, reproductive-health nonprofits, and other tax-exempt organizations that provide or fund abortion would lose exemption and section 170(c) treatment unless their activity falls within the life-of-the-mother, rape, or incest exceptions. Donors to affected organizations may lose charitable deduction treatment. The IRS must determine which organizations provide or fund abortion, apply the new definition and exceptions, and enforce the rule for taxable years after enactment. Patients may face reduced services if affected nonprofits lose funding or tax benefits.
Key Provisions
- Revokes section 501 tax-exempt status for organizations that provide or fund abortion.
- Removes section 170(c) charitable contribution treatment for organizations covered by the abortion funding rule.
- Provides exceptions for abortions necessary to save the mother's life or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest.
- Applies the tax-exemption change to taxable years beginning after enactment.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Revokes federal tax-exempt status and charitable-contribution treatment for organizations that provide or fund abortion, with exceptions for abortions necessary to save the mother's life or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest.
Key Policy Areas
Tax Policy, Healthcare, Non-Profit Institutions
Primary Purpose
Revokes federal tax-exempt status and charitable-contribution treatment for organizations that provide or fund abortion, with exceptions for abortions necessary to save the mother's life or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Anti-abortion organizations
- Federal revenue collections
- Non-abortion nonprofits
Identified Costs
- Abortion providers
- Abortion funds
- Reproductive-health nonprofits
- Donors
- Internal Revenue Service
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Ms. Hageman (for herself, Mr. Steube, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Clyde, …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Abortion funds, Anti-abortion organizations, Reproductive-health nonprofits
Positive-direction: Anti-abortion organizations
Negative-direction: Abortion funds, Reproductive-health nonprofits
Donors, Federal revenue collections
Positive-direction: Federal revenue collections
Negative-direction: Donors
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology