End PG&E Lobbying Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The End PG&E Lobbying Act uses PURPA's State-consideration structure rather than directly imposing a federal criminal ban. It adds a new section 111(d) standard for a two-year lobbying ban covering former members of State regulatory authorities. During the two years after leaving the authority, a former member could not appear, lobby, or practice before that authority to influence decisions or obtain nonpublic information, and could not render paid services related to a case, proceeding, application, or other matter before that authority. Section 112 is amended so each State regulatory authority with ratemaking authority over electric utilities must begin considering the new standard or set a hearing date within one year and complete consideration and make a determination within two years. Existing State action is respected if, before enactment, the State had implemented, considered, or had its legislature vote on the same or a comparable standard.
Who Benefits and How
Electric utility customers, ratepayers, public-interest advocates, ethics watchdogs, State utility commissions with existing comparable rules, and lawmakers concerned about regulatory capture benefit from a federal nudge toward cooling-off periods for former utility regulators. State commissions gain a clear standard they can adopt, reject, or compare against existing ethics rules through the PURPA process.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Former State utility regulators, utility lobbying firms, regulated electric utilities seeking insider representation, State regulatory authorities, commission hearing staff, and State legislatures face new or renewed ethics proceedings, lobbying limits, paid-representation restrictions, hearing deadlines, and implementation decisions. Former regulators may lose paid advocacy opportunities before their old commission for two years if the State adopts the standard.
Key Provisions
- Adds a PURPA standard for a two-year lobbying ban on former State regulatory authority members.
- Bars former regulators from appearing, lobbying, or practicing before their former authority to influence decisions or gain nonpublic information.
- Bars paid services connected to cases, proceedings, applications, or other matters before the former authority.
- Requires State regulatory authorities to begin consideration or set a hearing date within one year.
- Requires State regulatory authorities to complete consideration and make a determination within two years.
- Exempts utilities in States that already implemented, considered, or legislatively voted on comparable standards before enactment.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Adds a Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act standard under which State utility regulators consider a two-year lobbying ban for former State regulatory authority members, bars covered former regulators from appearing, lobbying, practicing before, or rendering paid services connected to matters before their former authority, sets one-year and two-year State consideration deadlines, and preserves prior State actions that already considered or adopted comparable standards.
Key Policy Areas
Utilities, Government Ethics, Energy
Primary Purpose
Adds a Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act standard under which State utility regulators consider a two-year lobbying ban for former State regulatory authority members, bars covered former regulators from appearing, lobbying, practicing before, or rendering paid services connected to matters before their former authority, sets one-year and two-year State consideration deadlines, and preserves prior State actions that already considered or adopted comparable standards.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Electric utility customers
- Ratepayers
- Public-interest advocates
- Ethics watchdogs
- State utility commissions
- State lawmakers
Identified Costs
- Former State utility regulators
- Utility lobbying firms
- Regulated electric utilities
- State regulatory authorities
- Commission hearing staff
- State legislatures
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Mr. Harder of California introduced the following bill; which was …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Electric utility customers, Regulated electric utilities
Positive-direction: Electric utility customers
Negative-direction: Regulated electric utilities
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology