To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to clarify that disparate impacts on certain populations constitute a sufficient basis for rights of action under such Act, and for other purposes.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill creates findings Congress finds the following: This Act is made necessary by a decision of the Supreme Court in Alexander v, creates prohibited discrimination Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C, and creates right of recovery Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. It relies on compliance mandates, definition changes, product standards, and delegation of rulemaking. The main policy areas are Education, Environment, Healthcare, and Finance.
Who Benefits and How
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk, Educational institutions and students affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities, and Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties, Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill would take on compliance duties, and Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Creates findings Congress finds the following: This Act is made necessary by a decision of the Supreme Court in Alexander v.
- Creates prohibited discrimination Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.
- Creates right of recovery Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.
- Requires actions brought by persons aggrieved In an action brought by a person aggrieved under this title against a covered entity who has engaged in unlawful intentional discrimination (not a practice that is unlawful...
- Requires disparate impact Discrimination (including exclusion from participation and denial of benefits) based on disparate impact is established under this title only if— a person aggrieved by discrimination on...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill creates findings Congress finds the following: This Act is made necessary by a decision of the Supreme Court in Alexander v, creates prohibited discrimination Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C, and creates right of recovery Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Education, Environment, Healthcare, Finance
Primary Purpose
The bill creates findings Congress finds the following: This Act is made necessary by a decision of the Supreme Court in Alexander v, creates prohibited discrimination Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C, and creates right of recovery Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
- Educational institutions and students affected by the bill
- Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
- Water infrastructure operators and water users affected by the bill
- Veterans and VA beneficiaries affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill
- Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill
- Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
- Transportation operators and users affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Tlaib (for herself, Ms. Bush, and Ms. Lee of …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology