HR6859-119

In Committee

HOTDOG Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 18, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill responds to findings that many stadiums and arenas receive public subsidies while charging food and drink prices far above nearby bars or restaurants. FTC must study covered venue concession pricing within 90 days, compare prices to surrounding establishments, assess dynamic pricing, service fees, value deals, and disclosures, and report to Congress within one year with findings and recommendations for consumer-friendly policies such as price caps or reduced-price menu options.

Who Benefits and How

Sports fans, concert attendees, taxpayers, and consumer advocates benefit from a federal pricing record that compares subsidized venue concessions with nearby market prices and identifies disclosure or price-cap options.

Who Bears the Burden and How

FTC staff, publicly subsidized venues, concession vendors, and venue operators bear the burden of data collection and possible scrutiny over markups, service fees, dynamic pricing, and disclosure practices.

Key Provisions

  • Directs the FTC to study food and drink prices at covered sports and entertainment venues.
  • Requires comparisons with surrounding bars and restaurants, including dynamic pricing, service fees, value deals, and disclosures.
  • Requires a congressional report with recommendations for consumer-friendly concession policies.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Federal Trade Commission to study concession pricing at publicly subsidized sports and entertainment venues and report whether fans are paying excessive markups, dynamic fees, or poorly disclosed charges.

Key Policy Areas

Consumers, Government, State & Local Government

Primary Purpose

Requires the Federal Trade Commission to study concession pricing at publicly subsidized sports and entertainment venues and report whether fans are paying excessive markups, dynamic fees, or poorly disclosed charges.

Policy Domains

Consumers Government State & Local Government

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Sports fans
  • Concert attendees
  • Taxpayers
  • Consumer advocates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Taxpayers: ,
Sports fans: ,
Concert attendees: ,
Consumer advocates: ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal Trade Commission staff
  • Publicly subsidized venues
  • Concession vendors
  • Venue operators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Venue operators: ,
Concession vendors: ,
Publicly subsidized venues: ,
Federal Trade Commission staff: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 18, 2025

Mr. Goldman of New York (for himself, Mr. Deluzio, Mr. …

Dec 18, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Dec 18, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Consumers
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive

Concert attendees, Sports fans

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Taxpayers supporting venue subsidies

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Federal Trade Commission staff

Tourism
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Publicly subsidized venues

Food & Beverage
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Concession vendors

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Consumers Government State & Local Government

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology