HR6533-119

In Committee

Military in Law Enforcement Accountability Act

119th Congress Introduced Dec 9, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Military in Law Enforcement Accountability Act adds new limits on military support for civilian law enforcement under title 10 sections 272, 273, and 274. Before the Secretary of Defense may provide support, the President must notify Congress and submit a written justification naming the recipient agency, budget, timeline, delivery schedule, completion date, funding source, sustainment arrangements, objectives, evaluation metrics, and prior three fiscal years of support. DOD support lasting more than 30 days requires enactment of a joint resolution of approval, with special House and Senate procedures and a three-fifths Senate vote. The bill also bars people serving in the Department of Defense, whether military or civilian, from simultaneously serving in civilian law enforcement outside DOD, except reserve component members serving in civilian capacity; reservists called to active duty must formally recuse from civilian law-enforcement duties. It broadens title 10 section 723 procedural requirements by removing the limitation to civil-disturbance responses, and it lets any person, State, or local government harmed by a violation sue in federal district court for injunctive relief, equitable relief, and damages.

Who Benefits and How

Communities affected by military support to policing benefit from advance congressional notice, written objectives, performance metrics, funding transparency, and a 30-day limit without congressional approval. Civil-liberties organizations benefit from a litigation mechanism to challenge violations. Congress benefits from a formal approval role for longer deployments. States and local governments benefit from a statutory cause of action if federal officials violate the limits. Reserve component members keep a civilian-law-enforcement exception when not on active duty.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The President and DOD officials must prepare detailed justifications before support is provided. The Secretary of Defense must stop support after 30 days unless Congress enacts approval. Civilian law-enforcement agencies receiving DOD support may face delays, documentation requirements, and loss of support without approval. DOD personnel must avoid simultaneous civilian law-enforcement service, and activated reservists must recuse from civilian law-enforcement duties. Federal officials face litigation exposure, damages, and injunctions for violations.

Key Provisions

  • Requires presidential notification and written justification before DOD support to civilian law enforcement.
  • Limits DOD support beyond 30 days unless Congress enacts a joint resolution of approval.
  • Establishes expedited congressional procedures and a three-fifths Senate vote for approval resolutions.
  • Prohibits most simultaneous service in DOD and civilian law enforcement, with a reserve-component exception.
  • Expands procedural requirements for Armed Forces and federal law-enforcement personnel assisting civil authorities.
  • Authorizes persons, States, and local governments to sue the federal government for violations.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires presidential notification and congressional approval for prolonged DOD support to civilian law enforcement, bars most simultaneous DOD and civilian law-enforcement service, expands procedural requirements for assistance to civil authorities, and creates a private right of action.

Key Policy Areas

Defense, Law Enforcement, Civil Liberties, Congressional Oversight

Primary Purpose

Requires presidential notification and congressional approval for prolonged DOD support to civilian law enforcement, bars most simultaneous DOD and civilian law-enforcement service, expands procedural requirements for assistance to civil authorities, and creates a private right of action.

Policy Domains

Defense Law Enforcement Civil Liberties Congressional Oversight

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Communities affected by federal deployments
  • Civil-liberties organizations
  • Congressional oversight committees
  • State governments bringing lawsuits
  • Local governments bringing lawsuits
  • Reserve component members
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Reserve component members: , , , , ,
Civil-liberties organizations: , , , , ,
Congressional oversight committees: , , , , ,
Local governments bringing lawsuits: , , , , ,
State governments bringing lawsuits: , , , , ,
Communities affected by federal deployments: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • President support-notification staff
  • Secretary of Defense
  • Department of Defense officials
  • Civilian law enforcement agencies
  • DOD personnel
  • Activated reservists
  • Federal officials exposed to lawsuits
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DOD personnel: , , , , ,
Activated reservists: , , , , ,
Secretary of Defense: , , , , ,
Department of Defense officials: , , , , ,
Civilian law enforcement agencies: , , , , ,
President support-notification staff: , , , , ,
Federal officials exposed to lawsuits: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 9, 2025

Mr. Liccardo (for himself, Ms. Houlahan, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, …

Dec 9, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition …

Dec 9, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Defense
9 mentions across 5 clauses
-7 negative ?2 uncertain

Armed Forces personnel, DOD civilian employees, DOD military personnel

Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -4 negative

Congressional oversight committees, Federal officials exposed to lawsuits, President support-notification staff

Positive-direction: Congressional oversight committees

Negative-direction: Federal officials exposed to lawsuits, President support-notification staff, United States district courts

Law Enforcement
5 mentions across 5 clauses
-5 negative

Civilian law enforcement agencies, Federal law enforcement personnel

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive ?1 uncertain

Civil authorities receiving federal assistance, Local governments bringing lawsuits, State governments bringing lawsuits

General Public
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Communities affected by federal deployments, Persons harmed by violations

Non-Profit Institutions
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Civil-liberties organizations

6/7
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Law Enforcement Civil Liberties Congressional Oversight
Actor Mappings
"courts"
→ ['United States district courts']
"agencies"
→ ['Department of Defense', 'Congress']
"affected_groups"
→ ['Communities affected by federal deployments', 'Civilian law enforcement agencies']

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology