HR6257-119

In Committee

SMK Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Nov 21, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The SMK Act applies to social media platforms that know or willfully disregard that a user is under 17. Platforms offering direct messaging to covered users must provide easily accessible parental direct messaging controls that parents can activate and manage with verifiable parental consent. Default controls must let parents receive and approve or deny requests from unapproved contacts, view and manage approved-contact lists, learn if a covered user changes an age field affecting controls, and disable direct messaging. Direct messaging for covered users under age 13 must be disabled by default unless a parent consents. App stores must provide clear warnings to parents when a covered user tries to download or buy a social media app with direct messaging if the parent has required consent. Violations are enforced by the FTC as unfair or deceptive acts or practices, State attorneys general can sue with FTC notice and intervention rights, encryption is protected from decryption or weakening mandates, State laws relating to the Act are preempted, and compliance dates are 180 days generally, one year for platform controls, and 18 months for app-store warnings.

Who Benefits and How

Parents benefit from enforceable tools to approve minor direct-message contacts, disable messaging, and receive app-store warnings before downloads. Covered minors benefit from default under-13 direct-message disabling and guardrails against unapproved contacts. FTC and State attorneys general receive enforcement authority to police noncompliant platforms.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Social media platforms must build parental portals or settings, verifiable-consent flows, default restrictions, age-change alerts, anti-circumvention measures, and compliance systems. App stores must add parental warning functionality for covered downloads or purchases. The FTC and State enforcement offices must investigate and litigate violations while respecting encryption protections and Federal preemption.

Key Provisions

  • Defines covered users, social media platforms, direct messaging, ephemeral messaging, parental controls, and verifiable parental consent.
  • Requires social media platforms to provide usable parental direct messaging controls for covered minors.
  • Requires default tools for parent approval of unapproved contacts, approved-contact management, age-change notices, and disabling direct messaging.
  • Requires direct messaging to be disabled by default for covered users under age 13 unless a parent consents.
  • Requires app stores to warn parents before covered users download or purchase social media apps with direct messaging when consent settings are active.
  • Authorizes FTC and State attorney general enforcement while preserving encryption and preempting related State laws.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires social media platforms to give parents controls over minors’ direct messaging, disables direct messaging by default for users under 13, adds app-store warnings, and creates FTC and State enforcement.

Key Policy Areas

Technology, Children, Consumer Protection

Primary Purpose

Requires social media platforms to give parents controls over minors’ direct messaging, disables direct messaging by default for users under 13, adds app-store warnings, and creates FTC and State enforcement.

Policy Domains

Technology Children Consumer Protection

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Parents of covered minors
  • Covered social media users under age 17
  • Covered users under age 13
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • State attorneys general
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State attorneys general: , , , ,
Federal Trade Commission: , , , ,
Parents of covered minors: , , , ,
Covered users under age 13: , , , ,
Covered social media users under age 17: , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Social media platforms
  • App store providers
  • Platform trust and safety teams
  • State consumer protection offices
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
App store providers: , , , ,
Social media platforms: , , , ,
Platform trust and safety teams: , , , ,
State consumer protection offices: , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 11, 2025

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

Dec 11, 2025

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Nov 21, 2025

Mr. Dunn of Florida introduced the following bill; which was …

Nov 21, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.

Nov 21, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Nov 21, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Technology
9 mentions across 7 clauses
+2 positive -7 negative

App store providers, Platform trust and safety teams, Social media platforms

Social media platforms faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Social media platforms using encryption

Negative-direction: App store providers, Platform trust and safety teams

Consumers
8 mentions across 5 clauses
+8 positive

Covered social media users under age 17, Covered users under age 13, Covered users under age 17

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

State attorneys general, State legislatures

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Federal Trade Commission

Non-Profit Institutions
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Privacy advocates

7/10
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Technology Children Consumer Protection

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology