To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants for the purpose of establishing, operating, or expanding one-stop crisis facilities, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill establishes a $11.5 billion annual federal grant program (FY 2026-2030) for state and local governments, tribes, and territories to create, operate, or expand one-stop crisis facilities providing integrated behavioral. It relies on grants and appropriations. The main policy areas are Small Business, Healthcare, Social Welfare, and Finance.
Who Benefits and How
State governments could gain revenue opportunities, Metropolitan city governments could gain revenue opportunities, and Indian Tribes could gain revenue opportunities.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal taxpayers could face higher costs.
Key Provisions
- Establishes a $11.5 billion annual federal grant program (FY 2026-2030) for state and local governments, tribes, and territories to create, operate, or expand one-stop crisis facilities providing integrated behavioral...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill establishes a $11.5 billion annual federal grant program (FY 2026-2030) for state and local governments, tribes, and territories to create, operate, or expand one-stop crisis facilities providing integrated behavioral.
Key Policy Areas
Small Business, Healthcare, Social Welfare, Finance
Primary Purpose
The bill establishes a $11.5 billion annual federal grant program (FY 2026-2030) for state and local governments, tribes, and territories to create, operate, or expand one-stop crisis facilities providing integrated behavioral.
Policy Domains
SBIR/STTR Oversight Act
Identified Gains
- State governments
- Metropolitan city governments
- Indian Tribes
- County governments
- Substance use disorder treatment facilities
Identified Costs
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Smith of Washington introduced the following bill; which was …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
County governments, Indian Tribes, Metropolitan city governments
Behavioral health treatment providers, Hospital emergency departments
Substance use disorder treatment facilities
Housing service providers and shelters
Community-based social service organizations
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_director"
- → Director of the National Institutes of Health
- "comptroller_general"
- → Comptroller General of the United States
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
A small business concern that has not previously received an SBIR or STTR award
Small business concerns located in States with historically low SBIR/STTR awards, small business concerns owned and controlled by women, and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals
A Federal agency carrying out an SBIR or STTR program under section 9 of the Small Business Act
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology