HR5581-119

In Committee

Uniform Standards Protection Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Sep 26, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Uniform Standards Protection Act of 2025 blocks states from imposing uniform requirements on federal law enforcement officers. It provides that notwithstanding state law, no state-law requirement may be imposed regarding the wearing of a uniform by any federal law enforcement officer. The definition uses 18 U.S.C. 115(c) and expressly includes officers or employees of the United States responsible for enforcing immigration laws under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The bill also stops any pending proceeding against a federal law enforcement officer for violating a state law that conflicts with this federal rule as of enactment.

Who Benefits and How

Federal law enforcement officers benefit because state uniform rules could not regulate what they wear while performing federal duties. Federal immigration enforcement officers benefit because the bill expressly includes immigration-law enforcement personnel. Federal law enforcement agencies benefit from uniform-policy control without separate state requirements. Officers facing pending state uniform proceedings benefit because contrary proceedings may not continue after enactment.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State governments lose authority to impose uniform requirements on federal law enforcement officers. State prosecutors and regulators must stop pending proceedings that conflict with the Act. State legislatures cannot enforce contrary uniform laws against covered federal officers. Members of the public seeking visible identification rules for federal officers lose a state-law path for those requirements.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits state-law uniform requirements for federal law enforcement officers.
  • Includes federal immigration enforcement officers within the covered definition.
  • Blocks pending state proceedings against federal officers for contrary state uniform-law violations.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Preempts state-law requirements about uniforms worn by federal law enforcement officers, includes federal immigration enforcement officers, and stops pending state proceedings that conflict with the federal limitation.

Key Policy Areas

Law Enforcement, Federal Preemption, Immigration Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Preempts state-law requirements about uniforms worn by federal law enforcement officers, includes federal immigration enforcement officers, and stops pending state proceedings that conflict with the federal limitation.

Policy Domains

Law Enforcement Federal Preemption Immigration Enforcement

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Federal law enforcement officers
  • Federal immigration enforcement officers
  • Federal law enforcement agencies
  • Officers facing pending state uniform proceedings
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal law enforcement agencies:
Federal law enforcement officers:
Federal immigration enforcement officers:
Officers facing pending state uniform proceedings:
Identified Costs
  • State governments
  • State prosecutors
  • State legislatures
  • Public identification advocates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
State governments:
State prosecutors:
State legislatures:
Public identification advocates:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 26, 2025

Mr. Higgins of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was …

Sep 26, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sep 26, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Federal law enforcement agencies, Federal law enforcement officers

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

State governments, State prosecutors

Immigration
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Federal immigration enforcement officers

Nonprofits
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Public identification advocates

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Law Enforcement Federal Preemption Immigration Enforcement

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology