HR5301-119

Reported

PIPES Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Sep 11, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The PIPES Act of 2025 is a broad pipeline-safety reauthorization. It authorizes PHMSA gas and hazardous-liquid pipeline safety funding from user fees for fiscal years 2026 through 2029, rising from $181.4 million in 2026 to $206.6 million in 2029, with state grants rising from $73 million to $79 million. It also authorizes Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund amounts for hazardous-liquid safety work, rising from $30 million to $33 million over the same period.

The bill pushes PHMSA to publish updates on overdue rulemakings, make inspection activity available electronically, create or rename an Office of Public Engagement, report on state pipeline-safety grant reimbursement, and study pipeline failure costs. It adds carbon dioxide pipeline safety language, requires studies or rulemaking work on hydrogen and composite materials, creates a confidential voluntary information-sharing system for pipeline safety data, and directs work on geohazards, integrity management, excavation damage prevention, localized emergency alerts, LNG regulatory coordination, and maximum allowable operating pressure.

Who Benefits and How

PHMSA benefits from multi-year authorization and clearer program direction. State pipeline safety agencies benefit from grant funding and budget reporting aimed at 80 percent reimbursement. Municipal and community-owned natural gas utilities benefit from SECURE Natural Gas grants for replacing vulnerable infrastructure. Pipeline operators benefit from rights-of-way flexibility, class-location rule updates, special permit process changes, formal hearing rights, and temporary relief from some maximum allowable operating pressure reconfirmation requirements. Academic institutions benefit from pipeline-safety research funding, and communities near pipelines benefit from public engagement, emergency-alert, and safety-data initiatives.

Who Bears the Burden and How

PHMSA and DOT staff must administer the reauthorization, publish rulemaking updates, manage studies, create working groups, and run the voluntary information-sharing system. Pipeline operators face higher civil penalties, expanded carbon dioxide safety coverage, reporting expectations, and continued integrity-management obligations. Carbon dioxide pipeline operators must prepare for federal safety standards tied to liquid or supercritical CO2 transportation. LNG project sponsors must coordinate with federal regulators under the LNG provisions. People who damage or disrupt pipeline infrastructure face stronger criminal exposure. Congressional committees must review more notifications and reports.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes PHMSA gas and hazardous-liquid pipeline safety funding for fiscal years 2026 through 2029.
  • Provides state pipeline-safety grant funding and requires reporting on reimbursement levels.
  • Requires public updates on outstanding pipeline rulemaking mandates and inspection activity.
  • Establishes a confidential voluntary information-sharing system for pipeline safety data.
  • Adds carbon dioxide pipeline safety provisions and directs hydrogen and composite-materials studies.
  • Modifies rights-of-way management, class-location changes, special permits, formal hearings, and maximum allowable operating pressure requirements.
  • Increases penalties for pipeline infrastructure disruption and requires studies on geohazards, integrity management, failure costs, and emergency alerts.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Reauthorizes PHMSA pipeline-safety programs through fiscal year 2029, increases pipeline-safety grants and trust-fund authorizations, adds transparency and workforce requirements, expands federal treatment of carbon dioxide and hydrogen pipeline issues, creates voluntary safety data sharing, and changes compliance rules for rights-of-way, class locations, special permits, hearings, penalties, and maximum allowable operating pressure.

Key Policy Areas

Pipeline Safety, Energy, Transportation, Public Safety, Environment

Primary Purpose

Reauthorizes PHMSA pipeline-safety programs through fiscal year 2029, increases pipeline-safety grants and trust-fund authorizations, adds transparency and workforce requirements, expands federal treatment of carbon dioxide and hydrogen pipeline issues, creates voluntary safety data sharing, and changes compliance rules for rights-of-way, class locations, special permits, hearings, penalties, and maximum allowable operating pressure.

Policy Domains

Pipeline Safety Energy Transportation Public Safety Environment

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
  • State pipeline safety agencies
  • Municipal natural gas utilities
  • Community-owned natural gas utilities
  • Pipeline operators
  • Academic institutions conducting pipeline safety research
  • Communities near pipelines
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Pipeline operators: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Communities near pipelines: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
State pipeline safety agencies: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Municipal natural gas utilities: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Community-owned natural gas utilities: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Academic institutions conducting pipeline safety research: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • PHMSA program staff
  • DOT rulemaking staff
  • Pipeline operators
  • Carbon dioxide pipeline operators
  • LNG project sponsors
  • People who damage pipeline infrastructure
  • Congressional oversight committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Pipeline operators: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
PHMSA program staff: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
DOT rulemaking staff: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
LNG project sponsors: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Carbon dioxide pipeline operators: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Congressional oversight committees: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
People who damage pipeline infrastructure: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 17, 2025

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Sep 17, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Sep 17, 2025

Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials Discharged

Sep 15, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.

Sep 11, 2025

Mr. Graves (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Webster …

Sep 11, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in …

Sep 11, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Oil & Gas
19 mentions across 17 clauses
+13 positive -3 negative ?3 uncertain

Carbon dioxide pipeline operators, LNG facility operators, Municipal and community-owned natural gas distribution utilities

Natural gas transmission pipeline operators faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: LNG facility operators, Municipal and community-owned natural gas distribution utilities, Pipeline industry stakeholders, Pipeline operators, Pipeline operators (gas, hazardous liquid, carbon dioxide), Pipeline operators facing enforcement actions, Pipeline operators participating in VIS, Pipeline operators seeking special permits, Pipeline safety professionals serving on Governing Board, Pipeline safety stakeholders

Negative-direction: Carbon dioxide pipeline operators

Government
14 mentions across 14 clauses
+2 positive -12 negative

Department of Transportation, Federal regulatory agencies (PHMSA, FERC, Coast Guard), GAO

PHMSA faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Negative-direction: Department of Transportation, Federal regulatory agencies (PHMSA, FERC, Coast Guard), GAO, PHMSA enforcement staff

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+3 positive -1 negative

State one-call programs, State pipeline safety programs, State, Tribal, and local emergency responders

Positive-direction: State pipeline safety programs, State, Tribal, and local emergency responders

Negative-direction: State one-call programs

General Public
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -1 negative

Communities near natural gas pipelines, Communities near pipeline facilities, Persons who sabotage pipeline infrastructure

Positive-direction: Communities near natural gas pipelines, Communities near pipeline facilities

Negative-direction: Persons who sabotage pipeline infrastructure

Manufacturing
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Carbon capture and sequestration companies, Composite pipeline material manufacturers

Professional Associations
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive ?1 uncertain

Standards development organizations, Technical Safety Standards Committee members

Research & Science
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

National Academies

Construction
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Excavation contractors

31/34
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Pipeline Safety Energy Transportation Public Safety Environment
Actor Mappings
"dot"
→ Department of Transportation
"phmsa"
→ Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology