PIPES Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The PIPES Act of 2025 is a broad pipeline-safety reauthorization. It authorizes PHMSA gas and hazardous-liquid pipeline safety funding from user fees for fiscal years 2026 through 2029, rising from $181.4 million in 2026 to $206.6 million in 2029, with state grants rising from $73 million to $79 million. It also authorizes Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund amounts for hazardous-liquid safety work, rising from $30 million to $33 million over the same period.
The bill pushes PHMSA to publish updates on overdue rulemakings, make inspection activity available electronically, create or rename an Office of Public Engagement, report on state pipeline-safety grant reimbursement, and study pipeline failure costs. It adds carbon dioxide pipeline safety language, requires studies or rulemaking work on hydrogen and composite materials, creates a confidential voluntary information-sharing system for pipeline safety data, and directs work on geohazards, integrity management, excavation damage prevention, localized emergency alerts, LNG regulatory coordination, and maximum allowable operating pressure.
Who Benefits and How
PHMSA benefits from multi-year authorization and clearer program direction. State pipeline safety agencies benefit from grant funding and budget reporting aimed at 80 percent reimbursement. Municipal and community-owned natural gas utilities benefit from SECURE Natural Gas grants for replacing vulnerable infrastructure. Pipeline operators benefit from rights-of-way flexibility, class-location rule updates, special permit process changes, formal hearing rights, and temporary relief from some maximum allowable operating pressure reconfirmation requirements. Academic institutions benefit from pipeline-safety research funding, and communities near pipelines benefit from public engagement, emergency-alert, and safety-data initiatives.
Who Bears the Burden and How
PHMSA and DOT staff must administer the reauthorization, publish rulemaking updates, manage studies, create working groups, and run the voluntary information-sharing system. Pipeline operators face higher civil penalties, expanded carbon dioxide safety coverage, reporting expectations, and continued integrity-management obligations. Carbon dioxide pipeline operators must prepare for federal safety standards tied to liquid or supercritical CO2 transportation. LNG project sponsors must coordinate with federal regulators under the LNG provisions. People who damage or disrupt pipeline infrastructure face stronger criminal exposure. Congressional committees must review more notifications and reports.
Key Provisions
- Authorizes PHMSA gas and hazardous-liquid pipeline safety funding for fiscal years 2026 through 2029.
- Provides state pipeline-safety grant funding and requires reporting on reimbursement levels.
- Requires public updates on outstanding pipeline rulemaking mandates and inspection activity.
- Establishes a confidential voluntary information-sharing system for pipeline safety data.
- Adds carbon dioxide pipeline safety provisions and directs hydrogen and composite-materials studies.
- Modifies rights-of-way management, class-location changes, special permits, formal hearings, and maximum allowable operating pressure requirements.
- Increases penalties for pipeline infrastructure disruption and requires studies on geohazards, integrity management, failure costs, and emergency alerts.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Reauthorizes PHMSA pipeline-safety programs through fiscal year 2029, increases pipeline-safety grants and trust-fund authorizations, adds transparency and workforce requirements, expands federal treatment of carbon dioxide and hydrogen pipeline issues, creates voluntary safety data sharing, and changes compliance rules for rights-of-way, class locations, special permits, hearings, penalties, and maximum allowable operating pressure.
Key Policy Areas
Pipeline Safety, Energy, Transportation, Public Safety, Environment
Primary Purpose
Reauthorizes PHMSA pipeline-safety programs through fiscal year 2029, increases pipeline-safety grants and trust-fund authorizations, adds transparency and workforce requirements, expands federal treatment of carbon dioxide and hydrogen pipeline issues, creates voluntary safety data sharing, and changes compliance rules for rights-of-way, class locations, special permits, hearings, penalties, and maximum allowable operating pressure.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- State pipeline safety agencies
- Municipal natural gas utilities
- Community-owned natural gas utilities
- Pipeline operators
- Academic institutions conducting pipeline safety research
- Communities near pipelines
Identified Costs
- PHMSA program staff
- DOT rulemaking staff
- Pipeline operators
- Carbon dioxide pipeline operators
- LNG project sponsors
- People who damage pipeline infrastructure
- Congressional oversight committees
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials Discharged
Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.
Mr. Graves (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Webster …
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in …
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Carbon dioxide pipeline operators, LNG facility operators, Municipal and community-owned natural gas distribution utilities
Natural gas transmission pipeline operators faces effects in multiple directions
Positive-direction: LNG facility operators, Municipal and community-owned natural gas distribution utilities, Pipeline industry stakeholders, Pipeline operators, Pipeline operators (gas, hazardous liquid, carbon dioxide), Pipeline operators facing enforcement actions, Pipeline operators participating in VIS, Pipeline operators seeking special permits, Pipeline safety professionals serving on Governing Board, Pipeline safety stakeholders
Negative-direction: Carbon dioxide pipeline operators
Department of Transportation, Federal regulatory agencies (PHMSA, FERC, Coast Guard), GAO
PHMSA faces effects in multiple directions
Positive-direction: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Negative-direction: Department of Transportation, Federal regulatory agencies (PHMSA, FERC, Coast Guard), GAO, PHMSA enforcement staff
State one-call programs, State pipeline safety programs, State, Tribal, and local emergency responders
Positive-direction: State pipeline safety programs, State, Tribal, and local emergency responders
Negative-direction: State one-call programs
Communities near natural gas pipelines, Communities near pipeline facilities, Persons who sabotage pipeline infrastructure
Positive-direction: Communities near natural gas pipelines, Communities near pipeline facilities
Negative-direction: Persons who sabotage pipeline infrastructure
Carbon capture and sequestration companies, Composite pipeline material manufacturers
Standards development organizations, Technical Safety Standards Committee members
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "dot"
- → Department of Transportation
- "phmsa"
- → Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology