HR5061-119

1. Short title; table of contents This Act may be cited as the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act. The table of contents of this Act is as follows:

2. Definitions Unless otherwise specified, the terms in section 44801 of title 49, United States Code, shall apply to this Act. In this Act: The term appropriate committees of Congress means— the Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; and the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. The term covered airport means— a large hub airport (as defined in section 47102 of title 49, United States Code) that qualifies as a large hub airport on or after January 1, 2025; a medium hub airport (as defined in section 47102 of title 49, United States Code) that qualifies as a large hub airport on or after January 1, 2025; or an airport with a total annual landed weight of all cargo of more than 7,500,000,000 pounds in 2023 or any year thereafter. The term covered entity means— the owner or proprietor of a covered site; and with respect to a covered event, the— organizing entity of such event; or the entity responsible for security at such event. The term covered event means an event— taking place at the location of an eligible large public gathering (as described in section 44812(c) of title 49, United States Code); with respect to which a flight restriction is maintained pursuant to section 521 of division F of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004 (49 U.S.C. 40103 note); or to prepare, test, train, or practice with counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, and technology at a location described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) for a limited period of time. The term covered site means a fixed site facility related to— critical infrastructure, such as energy production, transmission, distribution facilities and equipment, and railroad facilities; oil refineries and chemical facilities; amusement parks; or State prisons.

3. Protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft systems Section 210G of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n) is amended— in subsection (b)— in paragraph (1)— in subparagraph (A) by inserting or unmanned aircraft after During the operation of the unmanned aircraft system; in subparagraph (D) by striking Seize or exercise control of and inserting Seize, exercise control of, or otherwise confiscate; by striking subparagraph (E); and by redesignating subparagraph (F) as subparagraph (E); and by striking paragraphs (2) through (4) and inserting the following: The Secretary and the Attorney General shall coordinate with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration before exercising the authority described in paragraph (1). In authorizing the actions described in subsection (b), the Administrator shall ensure that each such authorized action would not result in an adverse impact on aviation safety, civil aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the use of the national airspace system. If the Administration determines under subparagraph (B) that an action would not result in such an adverse impact, the Secretary and the Attorney General may take or authorize the taking of such action. If the Administrator determines such action would result in an adverse impact, the Secretary and the Attorney General shall coordinate with the Administrator to take any necessary action to ensure that such an adverse impact can be sufficiently mitigated. The Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Transportation shall conduct research on, testing on, training on, and evaluation of equipment, including electronic equipment, and technology to determine the capability and utility of such equipment or technology for any action described in paragraph (1), including prior to the initial use of such equipment or technology. The Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Transportation shall coordinate activities under this paragraph and mutually share data and results from such activities. Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall maintain a list of approved makes and models of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, and technology. Such list shall include the following: A description of the specific detection or mitigation functions of each such system, equipment, or technology that enable each such system, equipment, or technology to carry out an action described in paragraph (1). Whether each such system, equipment, or technology is authorized for an action described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (1). Any conditions or restrictions generally applicable to the use, location, or positioning of each such system, equipment, or technology, including whether and how each such system, equipment, or technology may be suitable for use in terminal airspace. A counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology may not be included on the list maintained under subparagraph (A) unless the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration makes a written determination that— the system, equipment, or technology meets any applicable minimum performance requirements as described in section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code; and the use of such system, equipment, or technology does not present an adverse impact on aviation safety, civil aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the use of the national airspace system; or in the event the Administrator identifies such an adverse impact from such system, equipment, or technology, such an adverse impact can be sufficiently mitigated and the mitigation activities are described in the list maintained under subparagraph (A) or in a manner determined by the Administrator. The Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall consult with the Federal Communications Commission or the Administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, as appropriate, to determine whether the use of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology on the list maintained under subparagraph (A)— does not present an adverse impact on civilian telecommunications, communications spectrum, internet technology, or radio communications networks or systems; or in the event that such an adverse impact is identified, such impact can be sufficiently mitigated, or the system, equipment, or technology is excluded from the list maintained under subparagraph (A) until such an adverse impact is sufficiently mitigated. The Secretary may not include on the list maintained under subparagraph (A) a counter-UAS detection and mitigation system, equipment, and technology, manufactured or developed by a covered manufacturer. This subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements in effect as of the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act. Upon the inclusion of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology on the list maintained under subparagraph (A), the Secretary and the Attorney General may utilize such system, equipment, or technology for any action described in paragraph (1). The Secretary of Homeland Security is exempt from the limitation under this subsection if the Secretary determines that the operation or procurement of such system, equipment, or technology is for the sole purpose of research, evaluation, training, testing, or analysis. In this subparagraph: The term covered manufacturer means an entity that is owned by, controlled by, is a subsidiary of, or is otherwise related legally or financially to, a person based in a country that— is identified as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677)) as of the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act; was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required under section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a priority foreign country under subsection (a)(2) of such section; and is subject to monitoring by the United States Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2416). The term otherwise related legally or financially does not include a minority stake relationship or investment. Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to— prevent the Secretary, the Attorney General, or the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration from exercising any authority to counter unmanned aircraft systems in effect prior to the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act; or require the disclosure of the list maintained under subparagraph (A) to the general public. in subsection (d) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following: The Secretary, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Attorney General shall coordinate to develop their respective regulations and guidance under paragraph (1) before issuing any such regulation or guidance. in subsection (e)— by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following: records of such communications are disposed of immediately following an action described in subsection (b)(1) to mitigate a credible threat referred to in subsection (a), except that if the Secretary or the Attorney General determines that maintenance of such records is necessary to investigate or prosecute a violation of law as required by Federal law or for the purpose of litigation, such records may be maintained for not more than 90 days; in paragraph (4)— in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking are not disclosed outside the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Justice unless and inserting are not shared outside of the department in possession of such communications, except if; and in subparagraph (B) by striking of, or any regulatory, statutory, or other enforcement action relating to an action described in subsection (b)(1); in subsection (f) by striking within the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Justice; in subsection (g)— in paragraph (1) by striking the Secretary and the Attorney General shall, respectively, and inserting the Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Transportation shall jointly; by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) and inserting the following: Each briefing required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: The number of instances and a description of each instance in which actions described in subsection (b)(1) have been taken, including all such instances that— equipment, system, or technology disrupted the transmission of radio or electronic signals, including and disaggregated by whether any such disruption was minimized; may have resulted in harm, damage, or loss to a person or to private property, including and disaggregated by whether any such harm, damage, or loss was minimized; resulted in successful seizure, exercise of control, or confiscation under subsection (b)(1)(D); or required the use of reasonable force under subsection (b)(1)(E). The frequency and nature of instances in which communications were intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (b)(1), including the following: The approximate number and nature of incriminating communications intercepted. The approximate number and nature of other communications intercepted. The total number of instances in which records of communications intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (b)(1) were— shared with the Department of Justice or another Federal law enforcement agency, including a list of receiving Federal law enforcement agencies; or maintained for more than 90 days. The number of instances and a description of each instance in which the Secretary, Secretary of Transportation, or the Attorney General have engaged with Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies to implement the authority under this section, including the number of instances that resulted in a criminal investigation or litigation. Information on the implementation of paragraphs (3) and (4)(A) of subsection (b), including regarding equipment or technology, including electronic equipment to address emerging trends and changes in unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft system-related security threats. in paragraph (5)— in the first sentence— by striking new technology and inserting counter-UAS detection and mitigation system, equipment, or technology approved under subsection (b)(4); and by striking the Secretary and the Attorney General shall, respectively, and inserting the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Transportation and the Attorney General, shall; and in the second sentence, by striking to the national airspace system and inserting to the safety and operation of the national airspace system; and by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; by striking subsection (i) and inserting the following: The authority under this section shall terminate on October 1, 2030. in subsection (k)— in paragraph (1)(B) by striking the Committee on Energy and Commerce,; in paragraph (3)— in subparagraph (A) by striking the Secretary or the Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretary of Transportation and inserting the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Transportation and the Attorney General,; in subparagraph (C)— in clause (i)— in subclause (II), by striking or after the semicolon; and by adding at the end the following: the security or protection functions for facilities, assets, and operations of Homeland Security Investigations; or the security and protection of public airports (as such term is defined in section 47102 of title 49, United States Code) under section 7 of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act; in clause (ii)— in subclause (I)— in item (aa), by striking section 533 of title 28, United States Code and inserting paragraph (2) or (3) of section 533 of title 28, United States Code, and that is limited to a specified period of time and location; and in item (bb), by inserting before the semicolon the following: , and that is limited to a specified period of time and location; and in subclause (III), by striking , as specified in and inserting pursuant to; in paragraph (6), by striking purposes of subsection (a) and inserting purposes of subsection (a) and paragraph (4) of subsection (e); and in paragraph (8) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— by striking and efficiency of the national airspace system and inserting , efficiency, and operation of the national airspace system; and by striking the Secretary or the Attorney General, respectively, and inserting the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Transportation and the Attorney General,; by striking subsection (l) and inserting the following: Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Transportation and the Attorney General, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the following: The information required under subsection (g)(2). A description of any guidance, policies, programs, and procedures to mitigate or eliminate any adverse impact of the activities carried out pursuant to this section, or the use of any counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology, on aviation safety, civil aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the use of the national airspace system. A description of the guidance, policies, programs, and procedures established to address privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties issues implicated by the activities carried out pursuant to this section. by adding at the end the following: The Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security (acting through the Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers) may— provide training relating to measures to take the actions described in subsection (b)(1); and establish or designate 1 or more facilities or training centers for the purpose described in paragraph (1). The Secretary and Attorney General, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, shall establish standards for initial and recurring training programs or certifications for individuals seeking to operate counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology under this section or the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act. In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Attorney General shall, at a minimum— consider the potential impacts of such systems, equipment, or technology to aviation safety, civil aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the civilian use of airspace, and appropriate actions to maintain aviation safety, as determined by the Administrator; establish interagency coordination requirements prior to deployment of such systems, equipment, or technology; establish the frequency at which an individual authorized to operate counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology shall complete and renew such training or certification; and consult with counter-UAS detection and mitigation system manufacturers and any other stakeholders determined appropriate by the Secretary and Attorney General. (2)Coordination (A)In generalThe Secretary and the Attorney General shall coordinate with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration before exercising the authority described in paragraph (1). (B)Determination of authorityIn authorizing the actions described in subsection (b), the Administrator shall ensure that each such authorized action would not result in an adverse impact on aviation safety, civil aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the use of the national airspace system. (C)Authorizing determinationIf the Administration determines under subparagraph (B) that an action would not result in such an adverse impact, the Secretary and the Attorney General may take or authorize the taking of such action. (D)Mitigating actionsIf the Administrator determines such action would result in an adverse impact, the Secretary and the Attorney General shall coordinate with the Administrator to take any necessary action to ensure that such an adverse impact can be sufficiently mitigated. (3)Research, testing, training, and evaluation (A)In generalThe Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Transportation shall conduct research on, testing on, training on, and evaluation of equipment, including electronic equipment, and technology to determine the capability and utility of such equipment or technology for any action described in paragraph (1), including prior to the initial use of such equipment or technology. (B)CoordinationThe Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Transportation shall coordinate activities under this paragraph and mutually share data and results from such activities. (4)List of authorized equipment and technologies (A)ListNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall maintain a list of approved makes and models of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, and technology. Such list shall include the following: (i)A description of the specific detection or mitigation functions of each such system, equipment, or technology that enable each such system, equipment, or technology to carry out an action described in paragraph (1). (ii)Whether each such system, equipment, or technology is authorized for an action described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (1). (iii)Any conditions or restrictions generally applicable to the use, location, or positioning of each such system, equipment, or technology, including whether and how each such system, equipment, or technology may be suitable for use in terminal airspace. (B)Impact determination by AdministratorA counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology may not be included on the list maintained under subparagraph (A) unless the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration makes a written determination that— (i) (I)the system, equipment, or technology meets any applicable minimum performance requirements as described in section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code; and (II)the use of such system, equipment, or technology does not present an adverse impact on aviation safety, civil aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the use of the national airspace system; or (ii)in the event the Administrator identifies such an adverse impact from such system, equipment, or technology, such an adverse impact can be sufficiently mitigated and the mitigation activities are described in the list maintained under subparagraph (A) or in a manner determined by the Administrator. (C)Spectrum impact consultationThe Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall consult with the Federal Communications Commission or the Administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, as appropriate, to determine whether the use of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology on the list maintained under subparagraph (A)— (i)does not present an adverse impact on civilian telecommunications, communications spectrum, internet technology, or radio communications networks or systems; or (ii)in the event that such an adverse impact is identified, such impact can be sufficiently mitigated, or the system, equipment, or technology is excluded from the list maintained under subparagraph (A) until such an adverse impact is sufficiently mitigated. (D)Limitation on inclusion of counter-UAS systems manufactured by certain foreign enterprises (i)LimitationThe Secretary may not include on the list maintained under subparagraph (A) a counter-UAS detection and mitigation system, equipment, and technology, manufactured or developed by a covered manufacturer. (ii)International agreementsThis subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements in effect as of the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act. (iii)Authorized utilizationUpon the inclusion of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology on the list maintained under subparagraph (A), the Secretary and the Attorney General may utilize such system, equipment, or technology for any action described in paragraph (1). (iv)ExceptionThe Secretary of Homeland Security is exempt from the limitation under this subsection if the Secretary determines that the operation or procurement of such system, equipment, or technology is for the sole purpose of research, evaluation, training, testing, or analysis. (v)DefinitionsIn this subparagraph: (I)Covered manufacturerThe term covered manufacturer means an entity that is owned by, controlled by, is a subsidiary of, or is otherwise related legally or financially to, a person based in a country that— (aa)is identified as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677)) as of the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act; (bb)was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required under section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a priority foreign country under subsection (a)(2) of such section; and (cc)is subject to monitoring by the United States Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2416). (II)Otherwise related legally or financiallyThe term otherwise related legally or financially does not include a minority stake relationship or investment. (E)Rules of constructionNothing in this paragraph may be construed to— (i)prevent the Secretary, the Attorney General, or the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration from exercising any authority to counter unmanned aircraft systems in effect prior to the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act; or (ii)require the disclosure of the list maintained under subparagraph (A) to the general public.; (2)CoordinationThe Secretary, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Attorney General shall coordinate to develop their respective regulations and guidance under paragraph (1) before issuing any such regulation or guidance.; (3)records of such communications are disposed of immediately following an action described in subsection (b)(1) to mitigate a credible threat referred to in subsection (a), except that if the Secretary or the Attorney General determines that maintenance of such records is necessary to investigate or prosecute a violation of law as required by Federal law or for the purpose of litigation, such records may be maintained for not more than 90 days;; and (2)ContentEach briefing required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A)The number of instances and a description of each instance in which actions described in subsection (b)(1) have been taken, including all such instances that— (i)equipment, system, or technology disrupted the transmission of radio or electronic signals, including and disaggregated by whether any such disruption was minimized; (ii)may have resulted in harm, damage, or loss to a person or to private property, including and disaggregated by whether any such harm, damage, or loss was minimized; (iii)resulted in successful seizure, exercise of control, or confiscation under subsection (b)(1)(D); or (iv)required the use of reasonable force under subsection (b)(1)(E). (B)The frequency and nature of instances in which communications were intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (b)(1), including the following: (i)The approximate number and nature of incriminating communications intercepted. (ii)The approximate number and nature of other communications intercepted. (C)The total number of instances in which records of communications intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (b)(1) were— (i)shared with the Department of Justice or another Federal law enforcement agency, including a list of receiving Federal law enforcement agencies; or (ii)maintained for more than 90 days. (D)The number of instances and a description of each instance in which the Secretary, Secretary of Transportation, or the Attorney General have engaged with Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies to implement the authority under this section, including the number of instances that resulted in a criminal investigation or litigation. (E)Information on the implementation of paragraphs (3) and (4)(A) of subsection (b), including regarding equipment or technology, including electronic equipment to address emerging trends and changes in unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft system-related security threats.; (i)TerminationThe authority under this section shall terminate on October 1, 2030.; (IV)the security or protection functions for facilities, assets, and operations of Homeland Security Investigations; or (V)the security and protection of public airports (as such term is defined in section 47102 of title 49, United States Code) under section 7 of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act;; and (l)Annual reportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Transportation and the Attorney General, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the following: (1)The information required under subsection (g)(2). (2)A description of any guidance, policies, programs, and procedures to mitigate or eliminate any adverse impact of the activities carried out pursuant to this section, or the use of any counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology, on aviation safety, civil aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the use of the national airspace system. (3)A description of the guidance, policies, programs, and procedures established to address privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties issues implicated by the activities carried out pursuant to this section.; and (m)Counter-UAS system trainingThe Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security (acting through the Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers) may— (1)provide training relating to measures to take the actions described in subsection (b)(1); and (2)establish or designate 1 or more facilities or training centers for the purpose described in paragraph (1). (n)Counter-UAS detection and mitigation system operator qualification and training criteria (1)In generalThe Secretary and Attorney General, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, shall establish standards for initial and recurring training programs or certifications for individuals seeking to operate counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology under this section or the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act. (2)Training criteriaIn carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Attorney General shall, at a minimum— (A)consider the potential impacts of such systems, equipment, or technology to aviation safety, civil aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the civilian use of airspace, and appropriate actions to maintain aviation safety, as determined by the Administrator; (B)establish interagency coordination requirements prior to deployment of such systems, equipment, or technology; (C)establish the frequency at which an individual authorized to operate counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology shall complete and renew such training or certification; and (D)consult with counter-UAS detection and mitigation system manufacturers and any other stakeholders determined appropriate by the Secretary and Attorney General..

4. FAA counter-UAS activities Section 44810 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may take such actions as described in paragraph (2) that are necessary to— detect or mitigate a credible threat (as defined by the Secretary of Homeland Security and Attorney General, in consultation with the Administrator) that an operation of an unmanned aircraft or an unmanned aircraft system poses to the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system; or test or evaluate the potential adverse impacts or interference of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology on or with safe airport operations, aircraft navigation, air traffic services, or the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system. In carrying out paragraph (1), the Administrator may take the following actions: Detect, identify, monitor, and track an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft, without prior consent from the operator of such system or aircraft, including by means of intercept or other access of a wire, oral, or electronic communication used to control the unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft. Contact or warn the operator of an unmanned aircraft system of a potential counter-UAS action authorized under this subsection. Seize, exercise control of, or otherwise confiscate an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft. Disrupt control of, disable, damage, or destroy an unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system, including by means of intercept or other access of a wire, oral, or electronic communication used to control the unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system. Section 46502 of this title or sections 32, 1030, and 1367 and chapters 119 and 206 of title 18 shall not apply to activities authorized by the Administrator pursuant to this section. In implementing the requirements of this section, the Administrator, in coordination with the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security, shall ensure that— the interception or acquisition of, or access to, or maintenance or use of, communications to or from an unmanned aircraft system under this section is conducted in a manner consistent with the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and applicable provisions of Federal law; communications to or from an unmanned aircraft system are intercepted or acquired only to the extent necessary to support an action as described under subsection (a)(2); records of such communications are disposed of immediately following herein authorized activity to mitigate a credible threat, unless the Administrator, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Attorney General determines that maintenance of such records— is necessary to investigate or prosecute a violation of law; would directly support the Department of Defense, a Federal law enforcement agency, or the enforcement activities of a regulatory agency of the Federal Government in connection with a criminal or civil investigation of, or any regulatory, statutory, or other enforcement action relating to, an action described in subsection (a)(2); is between the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General in the course of a security or protection operation of either agency or a joint operation of such agencies; or is otherwise required by law; and to the extent necessary, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General are authorized to share threat information, which shall not include communications described in this subsection, with State, local, territorial, or Tribal law enforcement agencies in the course of a security or protection operation. There is established within the Federal Aviation Administration an Office of Counter-UAS Activities for purposes of managing and directing the counter-UAS activities of the Administration. The Administrator shall designate a Director of Counter-UAS Activities, who shall be the head of the Office. In carrying out the activities described in paragraph (1), the Director shall— coordinate with other offices of the Administration to ensure that such activities do not adversely impact aviation safety or the efficiency of the national airspace system; lead the development and implementation of counter-UAS activity strategic planning within the Federal Aviation Administration; serve as the Administration’s primary point of contact for coordinating counter-UAS activities, including such activities of— Federal and State agencies; covered airports; and other relevant stakeholders; and carry out other such counter-UAS activities as the Administrator may prescribe. The Administrator shall coordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General to carry out this section, subject to any restrictions of the Secretary or Attorney General’s authority to acquire, deploy, and operate counter-UAS systems, equipment, or technology. Nothing under this section shall permit the Administrator to delegate any authority granted to the Administrator to any other Federal agency. Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary and the Attorney General, shall establish minimum performance requirements for the safe and reliable deployment or use of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, and technology within the national airspace system. In establishing minimum performance requirements under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall— leverage data collected in testing and evaluation activities conducted under this section and any other relevant testing and evaluation data determined appropriate by the Administrator; determine the extent to which a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology can safely operate without disrupting or interfering with the operation of aircraft or other national airspace system users; and establish specific requirements for the deployment and use of such systems, equipment, or technology in terminal airspace. In establishing minimum performance requirements under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider criteria, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security, to determine the degree to which counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology is reliable and effective in detecting or mitigating unauthorized unmanned aircraft system operations independent of data or information provided by the system manufacturer of such unmanned aircraft system. In establishing minimum performance requirements under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider criteria, as determined by the Federal Communications Commission, to determine the extent to which counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology can be safely operated without disrupting or interfering with the operation of civilian communications and information technology networks and systems, including such networks and systems that rely on radio frequency or cellular network communications links. Nothing in paragraph (1) shall require the Administrator to conduct a rulemaking in publishing minimum performance requirements under such paragraph. The Administrator may conduct such testing, evaluation, and validation of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, and technology as necessary to ensure— such systems, equipment, and technology will not have an adverse impact on the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system or transportation safety; and such systems, equipment, and technology meet minimum performance requirements under subsection (e). Prior to the commencement of any training or testing of counter-UAS systems, equipment, and technology used for detection or mitigation purposes, an agreement shall be established between the testing or training entity and the Administrator to ensure aviation safety. The Administrator shall develop a standardized process by which a manufacturer or end user of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology may demonstrate that such system, equipment, or technology meets the requirements established pursuant to subsection (e) which may include validation by an independent third party. In order to test and evaluate counter-UAS systems, equipment, or technology that detect or mitigate potential aviation safety risks posed by unmanned aircraft, the Administrator shall deploy such systems or technology at 5 airports, as appropriate, and any other location the Administrator determines appropriate. Notwithstanding section 46502 of this title or sections 32, 1030, and 1367 and chapters 119 and 206 of title 18, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct testing and evaluation of any counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology to assess potential impacts on, or interference with, safe airport operations, aircraft and air traffic navigation, air traffic services, or the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system. In carrying out this paragraph, the Administrator shall coordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the head of any other Federal agency that the Administrator considers appropriate. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator shall establish a voluntary verified unmanned aircraft system operator program. Under the voluntary verified operator program established under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall— determine criteria for operators of unmanned aircraft systems participating in the program to access different categories of airspace, including special use airspace, in which the operation of such systems is otherwise subject to limitations or prohibitions; enable routine access to airspace described in subparagraph (A) via digital means; and ensure such program serves as a repository of unmanned aircraft systems operators that have met criteria established by the Administrator relating to the establishment of safety programs, managerial competence, and compliance. In establishing the criteria under paragraph (2)(A), the Administrator— may consider— an operator’s establishment of safety programs, managerial competence, and record of compliance; the nature of an operator’s facilities, unmanned aircraft systems, and operations; and the sensitivity of different categories of airspace described in such paragraph; and shall assume that an unmanned aircraft systems operator that holds a certificate issued under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation) meets such criteria and allow such operator to participate in the voluntary verified operator program established under this subsection without imposing any additional requirements. The Administrator shall ensure that voluntary verified operator program participant information is current, comprehensive, and available via digital means to such entities as the Administrator determines appropriate, including other program participants, to improve aviation safety and streamline unmanned aircraft systems access to and identification in airspace in which such systems may otherwise be subject to limitations or prohibitions. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to— require a rulemaking to implement; impose additional requirements on unmanned aircraft systems operators or operations that— are otherwise permitted through other mechanisms or regulatory frameworks; or do not participate in the voluntary verified operator program established under this subsection; or restrain the authority of the Administrator to manage the use of or restrict navigable airspace under section 40103(b). Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the Administrator may not acquire, deploy, or operate, or authorize the acquisition, deployment, or operation of, a counter-UAS system or any associated elements, including software, manufactured or developed by a covered manufacturer. This subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements in place on the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act. The Secretary of Transportation is exempt from the limitation under this subsection if the Secretary determines that the operation or procurement of such system supports the safe, secure, or efficient operation of the national airspace system or maintenance of public safety, including activities carried out under the Federal Aviation Administration’s Alliance for System Safety of UAS through Research Excellence Center of Excellence, FAA-authorized unmanned aircraft systems test ranges, and any other testing and evaluation activity deemed to support the safe, secure, or efficient operation of the national airspace system or maintenance of public safety, as determined by the Secretary. In this subsection: The term covered manufacturer means an entity that is owned by, controlled by, is a subsidiary of, or is otherwise related legally or financially to, a person based in a country that— is identified as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677)) as of the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act; was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required by section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a priority foreign country under subsection (a)(2) of that section; and is subject to monitoring by the Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2416). The term otherwise related legally or financially does not include a minority stake relationship or investment. The Administrator shall provide the specified committees of Congress a briefing not less than once every 6 months on the activities carried out pursuant to this section. Each briefing required under this paragraph shall include— the number of instances and a description of each instance in which actions described in subsection (a)(2) have been taken, including all such instances that— equipment, systems, or technology disrupted the transmission of radio or electronic signals, including and disaggregated by whether any such disruption was minimized; may have resulted in harm, damage, or loss to a person or to private property, including and disaggregated by whether any such harm, damage, or loss was minimized; resulted in the successful seizure, exercise of control, or confiscation under subsection (a)(2); or required the use of reasonable force under subsection (a)(2); the frequency and nature of instances in which communications were intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (a)(2), including— the approximate number and nature of incriminating communications intercepted; the approximate number and nature of other communications intercepted; and the total number of instances in which records of communications intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (a)(2) were— shared with the Department of Justice or another Federal law enforcement agency, including a list of receiving Federal law enforcement agencies; or maintained for more than 90 days; the number of instances and a description of each instance in which Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration has engaged with Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies to implement the authority under this section, including the number of instances that resulted in a criminal investigation or litigation; and information on the actions carried out under subparagraphs (C) and (D) of subsection (a)(2), including equipment or technology to address emerging trends and changes in unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft system-related security threats. Each briefing required under this subsection shall be in an unclassified form, but shall be accompanied by an additional classified briefing at the request of the Chair or Ranking Member of any specified committee of Congress. Such briefings shall include, at a minimum— a description of instances in which an active mitigation action under this section has been taken, including all such instances that may have resulted in harm, damage, or loss to an individual or to private property; and a description of each covered site, including the capabilities of counter-UAS systems used at such sites. Beginning 180 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator shall— notify the specified committees of Congress of any newly authorized acquisition, deployment, or operation of a counter-UAS system, equipment or technology under this section not later than 90 days after such newly authorized acquisition, deployment, or operation; and in providing a notification under subparagraph (A), include a description of options considered to mitigate any identified impacts to the national airspace system related to the use of any counter-UAS system, technology, or equipment operated at a covered site, including the minimization of the use of any technology, equipment, or system that disrupts the transmission of radio or electronic signals. In this section: The term specified committees of Congress means— the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives; and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate. The term State means a State, the District of Columbia, and a territory or possession of the United States. This section ceases to be effective on October 1, 2030. The analysis for chapter 448 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 44810 and inserting the following: 44810.Counter-UAS activities (a)Authority (1)In generalThe Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may take such actions as described in paragraph (2) that are necessary to— (A)detect or mitigate a credible threat (as defined by the Secretary of Homeland Security and Attorney General, in consultation with the Administrator) that an operation of an unmanned aircraft or an unmanned aircraft system poses to the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system; or (B)test or evaluate the potential adverse impacts or interference of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology on or with safe airport operations, aircraft navigation, air traffic services, or the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system. (2)Authorized actionsIn carrying out paragraph (1), the Administrator may take the following actions: (A)Detect, identify, monitor, and track an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft, without prior consent from the operator of such system or aircraft, including by means of intercept or other access of a wire, oral, or electronic communication used to control the unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft. (B)Contact or warn the operator of an unmanned aircraft system of a potential counter-UAS action authorized under this subsection. (C)Seize, exercise control of, or otherwise confiscate an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft. (D)Disrupt control of, disable, damage, or destroy an unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system, including by means of intercept or other access of a wire, oral, or electronic communication used to control the unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system. (b)Applicability of other laws (1)In generalSection 46502 of this title or sections 32, 1030, and 1367 and chapters 119 and 206 of title 18 shall not apply to activities authorized by the Administrator pursuant to this section. (2)Privacy protectionIn implementing the requirements of this section, the Administrator, in coordination with the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security, shall ensure that— (A)the interception or acquisition of, or access to, or maintenance or use of, communications to or from an unmanned aircraft system under this section is conducted in a manner consistent with the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and applicable provisions of Federal law; (B)communications to or from an unmanned aircraft system are intercepted or acquired only to the extent necessary to support an action as described under subsection (a)(2); (C)records of such communications are disposed of immediately following herein authorized activity to mitigate a credible threat, unless the Administrator, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Attorney General determines that maintenance of such records— (i)is necessary to investigate or prosecute a violation of law; (ii)would directly support the Department of Defense, a Federal law enforcement agency, or the enforcement activities of a regulatory agency of the Federal Government in connection with a criminal or civil investigation of, or any regulatory, statutory, or other enforcement action relating to, an action described in subsection (a)(2); (iii)is between the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General in the course of a security or protection operation of either agency or a joint operation of such agencies; or (iv)is otherwise required by law; and (D)to the extent necessary, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General are authorized to share threat information, which shall not include communications described in this subsection, with State, local, territorial, or Tribal law enforcement agencies in the course of a security or protection operation. (c)Office of Counter-UAS Activities (1)In generalThere is established within the Federal Aviation Administration an Office of Counter-UAS Activities for purposes of managing and directing the counter-UAS activities of the Administration. (2)DirectorThe Administrator shall designate a Director of Counter-UAS Activities, who shall be the head of the Office. (3)DutiesIn carrying out the activities described in paragraph (1), the Director shall— (A)coordinate with other offices of the Administration to ensure that such activities do not adversely impact aviation safety or the efficiency of the national airspace system; (B)lead the development and implementation of counter-UAS activity strategic planning within the Federal Aviation Administration; (C)serve as the Administration’s primary point of contact for coordinating counter-UAS activities, including such activities of— (i)Federal and State agencies; (ii)covered airports; and (iii)other relevant stakeholders; and (D)carry out other such counter-UAS activities as the Administrator may prescribe. (d)Interagency coordination (1)In generalThe Administrator shall coordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General to carry out this section, subject to any restrictions of the Secretary or Attorney General’s authority to acquire, deploy, and operate counter-UAS systems, equipment, or technology. (2)NondelegationNothing under this section shall permit the Administrator to delegate any authority granted to the Administrator to any other Federal agency. (e)Counter-UAS detection and mitigation system performance requirements (1)In generalNot later than 270 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary and the Attorney General, shall establish minimum performance requirements for the safe and reliable deployment or use of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, and technology within the national airspace system. (2)Considerations (A)Aviation safetyIn establishing minimum performance requirements under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall— (i)leverage data collected in testing and evaluation activities conducted under this section and any other relevant testing and evaluation data determined appropriate by the Administrator; (ii)determine the extent to which a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology can safely operate without disrupting or interfering with the operation of aircraft or other national airspace system users; and (iii)establish specific requirements for the deployment and use of such systems, equipment, or technology in terminal airspace. (B)EfficacyIn establishing minimum performance requirements under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider criteria, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security, to determine the degree to which counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology is reliable and effective in detecting or mitigating unauthorized unmanned aircraft system operations independent of data or information provided by the system manufacturer of such unmanned aircraft system. (C)Other interferenceIn establishing minimum performance requirements under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider criteria, as determined by the Federal Communications Commission, to determine the extent to which counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology can be safely operated without disrupting or interfering with the operation of civilian communications and information technology networks and systems, including such networks and systems that rely on radio frequency or cellular network communications links. (3)Rule of constructionNothing in paragraph (1) shall require the Administrator to conduct a rulemaking in publishing minimum performance requirements under such paragraph. (f)Counter-UAS system testing, evaluation, and validation (1)Evaluation and validationThe Administrator may conduct such testing, evaluation, and validation of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, and technology as necessary to ensure— (A)such systems, equipment, and technology will not have an adverse impact on the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system or transportation safety; and (B)such systems, equipment, and technology meet minimum performance requirements under subsection (e). (2)Testing and trainingPrior to the commencement of any training or testing of counter-UAS systems, equipment, and technology used for detection or mitigation purposes, an agreement shall be established between the testing or training entity and the Administrator to ensure aviation safety. (3)DemonstrationThe Administrator shall develop a standardized process by which a manufacturer or end user of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology may demonstrate that such system, equipment, or technology meets the requirements established pursuant to subsection (e) which may include validation by an independent third party. (4)Airspace hazard mitigation program (A)Testing programIn order to test and evaluate counter-UAS systems, equipment, or technology that detect or mitigate potential aviation safety risks posed by unmanned aircraft, the Administrator shall deploy such systems or technology at 5 airports, as appropriate, and any other location the Administrator determines appropriate. (B)Testing and evaluationNotwithstanding section 46502 of this title or sections 32, 1030, and 1367 and chapters 119 and 206 of title 18, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct testing and evaluation of any counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology to assess potential impacts on, or interference with, safe airport operations, aircraft and air traffic navigation, air traffic services, or the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system. (C)CoordinationIn carrying out this paragraph, the Administrator shall coordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the head of any other Federal agency that the Administrator considers appropriate. (g)Voluntary verified operator program (1)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator shall establish a voluntary verified unmanned aircraft system operator program. (2)PurposeUnder the voluntary verified operator program established under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall— (A)determine criteria for operators of unmanned aircraft systems participating in the program to access different categories of airspace, including special use airspace, in which the operation of such systems is otherwise subject to limitations or prohibitions; (B)enable routine access to airspace described in subparagraph (A) via digital means; and (C)ensure such program serves as a repository of unmanned aircraft systems operators that have met criteria established by the Administrator relating to the establishment of safety programs, managerial competence, and compliance. (3)CriteriaIn establishing the criteria under paragraph (2)(A), the Administrator— (A)may consider— (i)an operator’s establishment of safety programs, managerial competence, and record of compliance; (ii)the nature of an operator’s facilities, unmanned aircraft systems, and operations; and (iii)the sensitivity of different categories of airspace described in such paragraph; and (B)shall assume that an unmanned aircraft systems operator that holds a certificate issued under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation) meets such criteria and allow such operator to participate in the voluntary verified operator program established under this subsection without imposing any additional requirements. (4)DataThe Administrator shall ensure that voluntary verified operator program participant information is current, comprehensive, and available via digital means to such entities as the Administrator determines appropriate, including other program participants, to improve aviation safety and streamline unmanned aircraft systems access to and identification in airspace in which such systems may otherwise be subject to limitations or prohibitions. (5)Rule of constructionNothing in this subsection shall be construed to— (A)require a rulemaking to implement; (B)impose additional requirements on unmanned aircraft systems operators or operations that— (i)are otherwise permitted through other mechanisms or regulatory frameworks; or (ii)do not participate in the voluntary verified operator program established under this subsection; or (C)restrain the authority of the Administrator to manage the use of or restrict navigable airspace under section 40103(b). (h)Limitations on operation of counter-UAS systems manufactured by certain foreign enterprises (1)LimitationNotwithstanding any other provision of this section, the Administrator may not acquire, deploy, or operate, or authorize the acquisition, deployment, or operation of, a counter-UAS system or any associated elements, including software, manufactured or developed by a covered manufacturer. (2)International agreementsThis subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements in place on the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act. (3)ExceptionThe Secretary of Transportation is exempt from the limitation under this subsection if the Secretary determines that the operation or procurement of such system supports the safe, secure, or efficient operation of the national airspace system or maintenance of public safety, including activities carried out under the Federal Aviation Administration’s Alliance for System Safety of UAS through Research Excellence Center of Excellence, FAA-authorized unmanned aircraft systems test ranges, and any other testing and evaluation activity deemed to support the safe, secure, or efficient operation of the national airspace system or maintenance of public safety, as determined by the Secretary. (4)DefinitionsIn this subsection: (A)Covered manufacturerThe term covered manufacturer means an entity that is owned by, controlled by, is a subsidiary of, or is otherwise related legally or financially to, a person based in a country that— (i)is identified as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677)) as of the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act; (ii)was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required by section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a priority foreign country under subsection (a)(2) of that section; and (iii)is subject to monitoring by the Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2416). (B)Otherwise related legally or financiallyThe term otherwise related legally or financially does not include a minority stake relationship or investment. (i)Briefings (1)Semiannual briefings and notifications (A)In generalThe Administrator shall provide the specified committees of Congress a briefing not less than once every 6 months on the activities carried out pursuant to this section. (B)ContentEach briefing required under this paragraph shall include— (i)the number of instances and a description of each instance in which actions described in subsection (a)(2) have been taken, including all such instances that— (I)equipment, systems, or technology disrupted the transmission of radio or electronic signals, including and disaggregated by whether any such disruption was minimized; (II)may have resulted in harm, damage, or loss to a person or to private property, including and disaggregated by whether any such harm, damage, or loss was minimized; (III)resulted in the successful seizure, exercise of control, or confiscation under subsection (a)(2); or (IV)required the use of reasonable force under subsection (a)(2); (ii)the frequency and nature of instances in which communications were intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (a)(2), including— (I)the approximate number and nature of incriminating communications intercepted; (II)the approximate number and nature of other communications intercepted; and (III)the total number of instances in which records of communications intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (a)(2) were— (aa)shared with the Department of Justice or another Federal law enforcement agency, including a list of receiving Federal law enforcement agencies; or (bb)maintained for more than 90 days; (iii)the number of instances and a description of each instance in which Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration has engaged with Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies to implement the authority under this section, including the number of instances that resulted in a criminal investigation or litigation; and (iv)information on the actions carried out under subparagraphs (C) and (D) of subsection (a)(2), including equipment or technology to address emerging trends and changes in unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft system-related security threats. (C)Classification (i)In generalEach briefing required under this subsection shall be in an unclassified form, but shall be accompanied by an additional classified briefing at the request of the Chair or Ranking Member of any specified committee of Congress. (ii)Content of briefingsSuch briefings shall include, at a minimum— (I)a description of instances in which an active mitigation action under this section has been taken, including all such instances that may have resulted in harm, damage, or loss to an individual or to private property; and (II)a description of each covered site, including the capabilities of counter-UAS systems used at such sites. (2)NotificationBeginning 180 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator shall— (A)notify the specified committees of Congress of any newly authorized acquisition, deployment, or operation of a counter-UAS system, equipment or technology under this section not later than 90 days after such newly authorized acquisition, deployment, or operation; and (B)in providing a notification under subparagraph (A), include a description of options considered to mitigate any identified impacts to the national airspace system related to the use of any counter-UAS system, technology, or equipment operated at a covered site, including the minimization of the use of any technology, equipment, or system that disrupts the transmission of radio or electronic signals. (j)DefinitionsIn this section: (1)Specified committees of CongressThe term specified committees of Congress means— (A)the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives; and (B)the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate. (2)StateThe term State means a State, the District of Columbia, and a territory or possession of the United States. (k)SunsetThis section ceases to be effective on October 1, 2030.. 44810. Counter-UAS activities..

44810. Counter-UAS activities The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may take such actions as described in paragraph (2) that are necessary to— detect or mitigate a credible threat (as defined by the Secretary of Homeland Security and Attorney General, in consultation with the Administrator) that an operation of an unmanned aircraft or an unmanned aircraft system poses to the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system; or test or evaluate the potential adverse impacts or interference of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology on or with safe airport operations, aircraft navigation, air traffic services, or the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system. In carrying out paragraph (1), the Administrator may take the following actions: Detect, identify, monitor, and track an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft, without prior consent from the operator of such system or aircraft, including by means of intercept or other access of a wire, oral, or electronic communication used to control the unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft. Contact or warn the operator of an unmanned aircraft system of a potential counter-UAS action authorized under this subsection. Seize, exercise control of, or otherwise confiscate an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft. Disrupt control of, disable, damage, or destroy an unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system, including by means of intercept or other access of a wire, oral, or electronic communication used to control the unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system. Section 46502 of this title or sections 32, 1030, and 1367 and chapters 119 and 206 of title 18 shall not apply to activities authorized by the Administrator pursuant to this section. In implementing the requirements of this section, the Administrator, in coordination with the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security, shall ensure that— the interception or acquisition of, or access to, or maintenance or use of, communications to or from an unmanned aircraft system under this section is conducted in a manner consistent with the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and applicable provisions of Federal law; communications to or from an unmanned aircraft system are intercepted or acquired only to the extent necessary to support an action as described under subsection (a)(2); records of such communications are disposed of immediately following herein authorized activity to mitigate a credible threat, unless the Administrator, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Attorney General determines that maintenance of such records— is necessary to investigate or prosecute a violation of law; would directly support the Department of Defense, a Federal law enforcement agency, or the enforcement activities of a regulatory agency of the Federal Government in connection with a criminal or civil investigation of, or any regulatory, statutory, or other enforcement action relating to, an action described in subsection (a)(2); is between the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General in the course of a security or protection operation of either agency or a joint operation of such agencies; or is otherwise required by law; and to the extent necessary, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General are authorized to share threat information, which shall not include communications described in this subsection, with State, local, territorial, or Tribal law enforcement agencies in the course of a security or protection operation. There is established within the Federal Aviation Administration an Office of Counter-UAS Activities for purposes of managing and directing the counter-UAS activities of the Administration. The Administrator shall designate a Director of Counter-UAS Activities, who shall be the head of the Office. In carrying out the activities described in paragraph (1), the Director shall— coordinate with other offices of the Administration to ensure that such activities do not adversely impact aviation safety or the efficiency of the national airspace system; lead the development and implementation of counter-UAS activity strategic planning within the Federal Aviation Administration; serve as the Administration’s primary point of contact for coordinating counter-UAS activities, including such activities of— Federal and State agencies; covered airports; and other relevant stakeholders; and carry out other such counter-UAS activities as the Administrator may prescribe. The Administrator shall coordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General to carry out this section, subject to any restrictions of the Secretary or Attorney General’s authority to acquire, deploy, and operate counter-UAS systems, equipment, or technology. Nothing under this section shall permit the Administrator to delegate any authority granted to the Administrator to any other Federal agency. Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary and the Attorney General, shall establish minimum performance requirements for the safe and reliable deployment or use of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, and technology within the national airspace system. In establishing minimum performance requirements under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall— leverage data collected in testing and evaluation activities conducted under this section and any other relevant testing and evaluation data determined appropriate by the Administrator; determine the extent to which a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology can safely operate without disrupting or interfering with the operation of aircraft or other national airspace system users; and establish specific requirements for the deployment and use of such systems, equipment, or technology in terminal airspace. In establishing minimum performance requirements under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider criteria, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security, to determine the degree to which counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology is reliable and effective in detecting or mitigating unauthorized unmanned aircraft system operations independent of data or information provided by the system manufacturer of such unmanned aircraft system. In establishing minimum performance requirements under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider criteria, as determined by the Federal Communications Commission, to determine the extent to which counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology can be safely operated without disrupting or interfering with the operation of civilian communications and information technology networks and systems, including such networks and systems that rely on radio frequency or cellular network communications links. Nothing in paragraph (1) shall require the Administrator to conduct a rulemaking in publishing minimum performance requirements under such paragraph. The Administrator may conduct such testing, evaluation, and validation of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, and technology as necessary to ensure— such systems, equipment, and technology will not have an adverse impact on the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system or transportation safety; and such systems, equipment, and technology meet minimum performance requirements under subsection (e). Prior to the commencement of any training or testing of counter-UAS systems, equipment, and technology used for detection or mitigation purposes, an agreement shall be established between the testing or training entity and the Administrator to ensure aviation safety. The Administrator shall develop a standardized process by which a manufacturer or end user of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology may demonstrate that such system, equipment, or technology meets the requirements established pursuant to subsection (e) which may include validation by an independent third party. In order to test and evaluate counter-UAS systems, equipment, or technology that detect or mitigate potential aviation safety risks posed by unmanned aircraft, the Administrator shall deploy such systems or technology at 5 airports, as appropriate, and any other location the Administrator determines appropriate. Notwithstanding section 46502 of this title or sections 32, 1030, and 1367 and chapters 119 and 206 of title 18, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct testing and evaluation of any counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology to assess potential impacts on, or interference with, safe airport operations, aircraft and air traffic navigation, air traffic services, or the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system. In carrying out this paragraph, the Administrator shall coordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the head of any other Federal agency that the Administrator considers appropriate. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator shall establish a voluntary verified unmanned aircraft system operator program. Under the voluntary verified operator program established under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall— determine criteria for operators of unmanned aircraft systems participating in the program to access different categories of airspace, including special use airspace, in which the operation of such systems is otherwise subject to limitations or prohibitions; enable routine access to airspace described in subparagraph (A) via digital means; and ensure such program serves as a repository of unmanned aircraft systems operators that have met criteria established by the Administrator relating to the establishment of safety programs, managerial competence, and compliance. In establishing the criteria under paragraph (2)(A), the Administrator— may consider— an operator’s establishment of safety programs, managerial competence, and record of compliance; the nature of an operator’s facilities, unmanned aircraft systems, and operations; and the sensitivity of different categories of airspace described in such paragraph; and shall assume that an unmanned aircraft systems operator that holds a certificate issued under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation) meets such criteria and allow such operator to participate in the voluntary verified operator program established under this subsection without imposing any additional requirements. The Administrator shall ensure that voluntary verified operator program participant information is current, comprehensive, and available via digital means to such entities as the Administrator determines appropriate, including other program participants, to improve aviation safety and streamline unmanned aircraft systems access to and identification in airspace in which such systems may otherwise be subject to limitations or prohibitions. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to— require a rulemaking to implement; impose additional requirements on unmanned aircraft systems operators or operations that— are otherwise permitted through other mechanisms or regulatory frameworks; or do not participate in the voluntary verified operator program established under this subsection; or restrain the authority of the Administrator to manage the use of or restrict navigable airspace under section 40103(b). Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the Administrator may not acquire, deploy, or operate, or authorize the acquisition, deployment, or operation of, a counter-UAS system or any associated elements, including software, manufactured or developed by a covered manufacturer. This subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements in place on the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act. The Secretary of Transportation is exempt from the limitation under this subsection if the Secretary determines that the operation or procurement of such system supports the safe, secure, or efficient operation of the national airspace system or maintenance of public safety, including activities carried out under the Federal Aviation Administration’s Alliance for System Safety of UAS through Research Excellence Center of Excellence, FAA-authorized unmanned aircraft systems test ranges, and any other testing and evaluation activity deemed to support the safe, secure, or efficient operation of the national airspace system or maintenance of public safety, as determined by the Secretary. In this subsection: The term covered manufacturer means an entity that is owned by, controlled by, is a subsidiary of, or is otherwise related legally or financially to, a person based in a country that— is identified as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677)) as of the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act; was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required by section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a priority foreign country under subsection (a)(2) of that section; and is subject to monitoring by the Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2416). The term otherwise related legally or financially does not include a minority stake relationship or investment. The Administrator shall provide the specified committees of Congress a briefing not less than once every 6 months on the activities carried out pursuant to this section. Each briefing required under this paragraph shall include— the number of instances and a description of each instance in which actions described in subsection (a)(2) have been taken, including all such instances that— equipment, systems, or technology disrupted the transmission of radio or electronic signals, including and disaggregated by whether any such disruption was minimized; may have resulted in harm, damage, or loss to a person or to private property, including and disaggregated by whether any such harm, damage, or loss was minimized; resulted in the successful seizure, exercise of control, or confiscation under subsection (a)(2); or required the use of reasonable force under subsection (a)(2); the frequency and nature of instances in which communications were intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (a)(2), including— the approximate number and nature of incriminating communications intercepted; the approximate number and nature of other communications intercepted; and the total number of instances in which records of communications intercepted or acquired during the course of actions described in subsection (a)(2) were— shared with the Department of Justice or another Federal law enforcement agency, including a list of receiving Federal law enforcement agencies; or maintained for more than 90 days; the number of instances and a description of each instance in which Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration has engaged with Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies to implement the authority under this section, including the number of instances that resulted in a criminal investigation or litigation; and information on the actions carried out under subparagraphs (C) and (D) of subsection (a)(2), including equipment or technology to address emerging trends and changes in unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft system-related security threats. Each briefing required under this subsection shall be in an unclassified form, but shall be accompanied by an additional classified briefing at the request of the Chair or Ranking Member of any specified committee of Congress. Such briefings shall include, at a minimum— a description of instances in which an active mitigation action under this section has been taken, including all such instances that may have resulted in harm, damage, or loss to an individual or to private property; and a description of each covered site, including the capabilities of counter-UAS systems used at such sites. Beginning 180 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator shall— notify the specified committees of Congress of any newly authorized acquisition, deployment, or operation of a counter-UAS system, equipment or technology under this section not later than 90 days after such newly authorized acquisition, deployment, or operation; and in providing a notification under subparagraph (A), include a description of options considered to mitigate any identified impacts to the national airspace system related to the use of any counter-UAS system, technology, or equipment operated at a covered site, including the minimization of the use of any technology, equipment, or system that disrupts the transmission of radio or electronic signals. In this section: The term specified committees of Congress means— the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives; and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate. The term State means a State, the District of Columbia, and a territory or possession of the United States. This section ceases to be effective on October 1, 2030.

5. Additional limited authority for detection, identification, monitoring, and tracking The Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Attorney General, may authorize the acquisition, deployment, and operation of approved counter-UAS detection systems, equipment or technology intended to be used for the detection of unmanned aircraft systems by a covered entity. In carrying out this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Administrator and the Attorney General, not later than 180 days after the establishment of this Act, shall establish an application process to authorize the acquisition, deployment, and operation of an approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology by covered entities, at covered sites or covered events. The application described in paragraph (1) shall contain— a justifiable need (based on a threat posed by an unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system to a covered site or covered event) to detect an unmanned aircraft system with an approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology; a plan for the acquisition, deployment, and operation of such counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology, that shall— be subject to the approval of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Attorney General; and include— a description of the covered site or covered event at which the counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology will be deployed and operated; a description of the time periods and dates during which the counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology will be operated; a written agreement between the covered entity and a Federal, State, local, or Tribal law enforcement agency to operate such approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology at a covered site or covered event on behalf of such covered entity; proof of completion of initial and recurrent training or certification requirements under section 210G(n) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(n)); and any other requirements the Secretary determines appropriate. The Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Attorney General, may waive the requirements of paragraph (2)(C) upon application from a covered entity if such covered entity demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the Secretary, that such covered entity has the expertise and ability to safely and lawfully operate an approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology under this section. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall approve or reject an application submitted under this subsection not later than 45 days after receiving such application (or 90 days if such application requests a waiver pursuant to paragraph (3)). Upon approval of an application required under subsection (b) by the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the applicable covered entity to authorize the acquisition, deployment, and operation of an approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology, that shall specify, at a minimum— the approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology to be operated; the covered site or covered event at which the system, equipment, or technology may be operated; the time periods, dates, and circumstances during which the counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology may be operated; and any terms and conditions on the deployment and operation of an approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology the Secretary determines necessary to ensure public safety. The Secretary shall revoke the authorization or approval for the deployment and operation of an approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology pursuant to this section for any reason the Secretary determines necessary, including if the Secretary determines that the covered entity has not— maintained, as applicable, an agreement that is acceptable to the Secretary with a Federal, State, local, or Tribal law enforcement agency to operate such approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology on behalf of the covered entity; complied with the initial and recurrent training or certification requirements under section 210G(n) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(n)); complied with the privacy protections under section 210G(e) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(e)); or operated an approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology in a safe manner. The Secretary shall coordinate with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Attorney General in carrying out the application and agreement processes under this section. Section 46502 of title 49, United States Code, or sections 32, 1030, and 1367 and chapters 119 and 206 of title 18, United States Code, shall not apply to activities authorized by the Secretary under this section or section 6. If the Administrator finds that a covered entity acquired and operated a counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary may authorize the use of such system, equipment, or technology if— such system, equipment, or technology meets the minimum performance requirements issued pursuant to section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code; and such covered entity submits an application under subsection (b) and enters into required agreements under subsection (c). Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 18 months thereafter, the inspectors general of the Department of Transportation, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Justice shall conduct a joint audit of the implementation of the requirements of this section, section 6, or section 7. Not later than 90 days after the date on which the inspectors general complete each audit required under subsection (h), the inspectors general shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the findings of such audit and any recommendations related to the administration of this section. The authorities under this section shall terminate on October 1, 2030. Nothing in this section or section 6 shall be construed to limit or restrict the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration from ensuring the safety and efficiency of the national airspace system. Nothing in this section or section 7 shall be construed to preclude a covered entity or public-use airport from acquiring and operating an approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology without an authorization if the lawful operation of such system, equipment, or technology does not— require the relief provided under subsection (f); and adversely impact the safe operation of the national airspace system. The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, in consultation with the Attorney General, may suspend the authority provided under this section or section 6 if the Administrator— determines that the exercise of such authority threatens the safety or efficiency of the national airspace system; and conveys in writing the determination to the Secretary of Homeland Security. The Administrator shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress within 48 hours of suspending the authority provided under this section under subparagraph (A). In this section, the term approved counter-UAS detection system means a counter-UAS detection system approved under section 210G(b)(4) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(b)(4)) and that meets the minimum performance requirements established pursuant to section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code.

6. Counter-UAS mitigation law enforcement pilot program Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, not later than 60 days after the first determination that a counter-UAS system with mitigation capabilities meets the requirements of section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall establish a pilot program to assess the efficacy of approved counter-UAS mitigation systems at covered sites and covered events and determine the appropriate policies, procedures, and protocols necessary to allow State and covered local law enforcement agencies (in coordination with the Secretary, Attorney General, and Administrator) to acquire, deploy, and operate approved counter-UAS mitigation systems and mitigate unauthorized UAS operations on behalf of covered entities. In carrying out this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Administrator, shall establish an application process to authorize the acquisition, deployment, and operation of an approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology by a State or covered local law enforcement agency, in partnership with a covered entity, at a covered site or covered event. The application described in paragraph (1) shall contain— a justifiable need (based on a threat posed by an unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system to a covered site or covered event) to mitigate an unmanned aircraft system with an approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology; a plan for the acquisition, deployment, and operation of such counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology, that shall— be subject to the approval of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration; and include— a description of the covered site or covered event at which the counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology will be deployed and operated; and a description of the time periods and dates during which the counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology will be operated; a written agreement between the covered entity and a State or covered local law enforcement agency to operate such approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology at a covered site or covered event on behalf of such covered entity; proof of completion of initial and recurrent training or certification requirements under section 210G(n) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(n)); proof that the airspace above such covered site or covered event is restricted by a temporary flight restriction, a determination under section 2209 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (49 U.S.C. 44802 note), or any other similar restriction determined appropriate by the Secretary; an endorsement from the chief executive of the State or territory within which the applicant has jurisdiction; and any other requirements the Secretary determines appropriate. Upon approval of an application required under subsection (b) by the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the applicable covered entity and State or covered local law enforcement agency to authorize the acquisition, deployment, operation of an approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology, that shall specify, at a minimum— the approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology to be operated; the covered site or covered event at which the system, equipment, or technology may be operated; the time periods, dates, and circumstances during which the counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology may be operated; any terms and conditions on the deployment and operation of an approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology the Secretary determines necessary to ensure public safety; the frequency with which the appropriate Federal agency representatives shall conduct periodic site visits to ensure compliance with the approved terms and conditions of deployment and operations of the approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology; the required Federal coordination prior to the mitigation of an unmanned aircraft system by a State or covered local law enforcement agency described in subsection (d)(1); and the post-event reporting requirements specified in subsection (d)(3). Until the date that is 270 days after the initial deployment of an authorized counter-UAS system, equipment, or technology, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall expressly approve, on a case-by-case basis, the mitigation of unmanned aircraft system by a State or covered local law enforcement agency under this section. In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall— verify that there is a justifiable threat that warrants the use of such counter-UAS system, equipment, or technology; verify that the use of such counter-UAS system, equipment, or technology will— be conducted in a manner consistent with the agreement between the Secretary and the State or covered local law enforcement agency; and abide by all safety protocols, terms, and conditions established for the use of such system, equipment, or technology at the covered site or covered event; and immediately notify the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration of the approval provided under this paragraph. Not later than 24 hours after each mitigation of a UAS conducted under the authorities in this section, the relevant State or covered local law enforcement agency shall submit to the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Attorney General a post-event report. The report under subparagraph (A) shall include all relevant information pertaining to the event, including the drone operation, and subsequent mitigation and enforcement actions, and subsequent enforcement actions, as specified by the Secretary. The Secretary shall revoke the authorization or approval for the deployment and operation of an approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology pursuant to this section if the Secretary determines that the covered entity has not— maintained an agreement that is acceptable to the Secretary with a State or covered local law enforcement agency to operate such approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology on behalf of the covered entity; complied with the initial and recurrent training or certification requirements under section 210G(n) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(n)); complied with the privacy protections under section 210G(e) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(e)); or otherwise operated an approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology in a safe and lawful manner. The Secretary shall coordinate with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Attorney General in carrying out the application, agreement, and revocation processes under this section. Before the initiation of the pilot program under this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall establish objectives, metrics, and success criteria for evaluating the results of pilot program in the areas of homeland security, public safety, aviation safety, airspace access for lawful aircraft operators, privacy, and civil liberties. The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, shall make a site-specific determination for each covered site or covered event selected under the pilot program established under this section to ensure that any potential use of counter-UAS mitigation systems, equipment, or technology at the covered site or covered event will not adversely impact the safe operation of the national airspace system, including any airport that is located near the covered site or covered event. If an adverse impact is identified under subparagraph (A) and cannot be safely mitigated to the satisfaction of the Administrator, the covered site or covered event is not eligible for participation in the pilot program established under this section. The program established under subsection (a) may include not more than 5 State or covered local law enforcement agencies. A State or covered local law enforcement agency participating in the pilot program established under subsection (a) may operate approved counter-UAS mitigation systems, equipment, or technology at— no more than 4 covered sites; and covered events. The Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator and the Attorney General— shall review the preliminary results of such pilot program against the objectives, metrics, and success criteria established in subsection (g); and may, if appropriate, take such actions as may be necessary to revise or expand, subject to the availability of trained personnel, the number of law enforcement agencies permitted to participate in the program— by 10, not sooner than 18 months after approved counter-UAS mitigation systems, equipment, or technology are deployed for use by State or covered local law enforcement agencies participating in the pilot program established under subsection (a); and by an additional 12 not sooner than 18 months after the date described in subclause (I). Not later than 6 months after the establishment of the pilot program under this section, and every 6 months thereafter, the Secretary shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress on the progress and findings of the pilot program established under this section, including a description of all mitigation events reported under subsection (d) and objectives, metrics, and success criteria under subsection (g). If an agency fails to provide a briefing or report required under this Act, including under paragraph (1), the time periods after which the Secretary may expand the pilot program under subsection (h)(2)(C) shall be extended by 6 months for each required briefing the Secretary fails to provide. In this section, the term covered multinational sporting event means a large public gathering hosted in a stadium or other venue that is organized by or directly on behalf of a covered entity responsible for organizing 1 of the following events: The 2026 FIFA World Cup. The Games of the XXXIV Olympiad. The 18th Summer Paralympic Games. Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall establish a program to enable the deployment and operation of approved counter-UAS mitigation systems by State and covered local law enforcement agencies responsible for securing covered multinational sporting events against unauthorized unmanned aircraft system operations. The Secretary, in consultation with the Governor of a State in which a covered multinational sporting event is occurring, shall select which State and local law enforcement agencies may apply to deploy and operate approved counter-UAS mitigation systems on behalf of a covered entity under this subsection. Subsections (c) through (f) shall apply to the program established under this section. The authority of the Secretary to authorize a State or local law enforcement agency to deploy or operate an approved counter-UAS mitigation system under this subsection shall terminate upon the conclusion of the relevant covered multinational sporting event. Not later than 30 days prior to the commencement of a covered multinational sporting event, the Secretary, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress of the approval and denial of all applications from State and local law enforcement agencies under this subsection. Not later than 3 months after the conclusion of a covered multinational sporting event, the Secretary, Attorney General, and Administrator shall provide a briefing to the appropriate committees of Congress on— the actions taken by the Secretary and State or local law enforcement agencies under the program; and lessons learned that the Secretary intends to integrate into the administration of the pilot program established under subsection (a). Upon the conclusion of the relevant multinational sporting event, the Secretary may transfer the following State or covered local law enforcement agencies to the pilot program established under subsection (a): 11 State or covered local law enforcement agencies associated with the multinational sporting event described in paragraph (1)(A). 2 State or covered local law enforcement agencies associated with the multinational sporting event described in paragraph (1)(B). A State or covered local law enforcement agency that is transferred to such pilot program under subparagraph (A) shall not be counted for purposes of the pilot program size restrictions in subparagraph (A) or (C) of subsection (h)(2). In selecting agencies to transfer to the pilot program established under subsection (a), the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, ensure that 1 State or covered local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over each of the sites of a multinational sporting event is selected. The Secretary shall not transfer an agency under subparagraph (A) if the Secretary, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, finds that an agency participating in the program established under this subsection— violated the terms of an agreement under subsection (c); or takes an action that would lead to a revocation under subsection (e). Except as provided in subsection (j)(5), the authority under this section shall terminate on October 1, 2030. Not later than 3 years after the initiation of the pilot program established under this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct and submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an assessment containing— an evaluation of the results of the pilot program, including as it relates to the objectives, metrics, and success criteria under subsection (g); a determination as to whether— counter-UAS authorities should continue to be extended to State and covered local law enforcement agencies; counter-UAS authorities should not continue to be extended to States and covered local law enforcement agencies; or additional information is needed to determine whether counter-UAS authorities should continue to be extended to State and covered local law enforcement agencies; and if a determination under subparagraph (B)(i) is made, recommendations on a proposed permanent regulatory structure relating to counter-UAS authorities for States and covered local law enforcement agencies, including— the size and scope of such regulatory structure; proposed criteria or qualifications for such agencies seeking to utilize such regulatory structure; and how such regulatory structure ensures the continuation of— training, certification, and Federal oversight requirements to ensure the safe and effective use of approved counter-UAS mitigation systems; required coordination with the Administrator to prevent any adverse impact on aviation safety, civil aviation and aerospace operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the use of the national airspace system; and privacy protections and requirements relating to the protection of civil liberties. The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. In this section: The term approved counter-UAS mitigation system means a counter-UAS detection system approved under section 210G(b)(4) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(b)(4)) and that meets the minimum performance requirements established pursuant to section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code. The term covered local law enforcement agency means a local law enforcement agency that has jurisdiction over an area containing a population of at least 650,000 people.

7. Counter-UAS system planning and deployment at airports Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, shall develop a plan for operations at covered airports of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology that meet the performance requirements described in section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code, for purposes of— ensuring the safety and security of aircraft; and responding to a persistent disruption of air traffic operations caused by unmanned aircraft system activity. The plan required under paragraph (1) shall consider, at a minimum— the roles and responsibilities of— Federal agency personnel, including air traffic control personnel and Federal Air Marshal resources; relevant airport personnel; and any other stakeholder the Administrator determines appropriate in the terminal airspace; operational procedures, protocols, policies, and guidelines pertaining to the deployment of such systems, equipment, or technology; minimum performance requirements for such systems, equipment, or technology; funding responsibilities and mechanisms for the acquisition, deployment, and operation of such systems, equipment or technology; the operational approval process by which such systems, equipment, or technology may be deployed; reporting requirements associated with the use of such systems, equipment, or technology; initial operator training and recurrent training requirements; how the remote identification of unmanned aircraft systems can be leveraged for the operation of counter-UAS systems, equipment or technology; how data and information obtained from counter-UAS equipment can be shared in a timely manner with airports; and any other content as determined necessary by the Administrator, the Secretary, and the Attorney General. In developing the plan described in paragraph (1), the Administrator— shall coordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General to consider, and if determined appropriate by the Administrator, include requirements and procedures for— conducting and updating airport-specific vulnerability assessments; developing airport-specific coordination and communication requirements with Federal agencies, local law enforcement, and airport personnel appropriate for the scope of such plan; tactical response and status reporting during events within the scope of such plan; and acquisition and deployment of counter-UAS systems, equipment, or technology within the scope of such plan; and shall consult with airport and law enforcement stakeholders, including the exclusive bargaining representative of air traffic controllers certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code, as appropriate. In carrying out this subsection, the Administrator shall review and update such plan not less than annually. Pursuant to the plan required in subsection (a) and subject to available appropriations, the Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and other relevant Federal agencies, shall provide for the deployment of approved counter-UAS detection systems, equipment, or technology within the terminal airspace of— each large hub airport (as defined in section 47102 of title 49, United States Code), not later than 30 months after the publication of the performance requirements described in section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code; a minimum of 3 airports that each have a total annual landed weight of all-cargo of more than 7,500,000,000 pounds in 2021 or any year thereafter, not later than 12 months after the publication of the guidance described in subsection (a); and each medium hub airport (as defined in section 47102 of title 49, United States Code), not later than 4 years after the publication of the performance requirements described in section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code. The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, in consultation with the Federal Communications Commission, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and other Federal agencies as appropriate, shall conduct site-specific spectrum and suitability assessments for each selected airport under the program, based on the specific counter-UAS detection systems, equipment, or technology intended to be deployed. Pursuant to the plan required in subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security, jointly with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and in coordination with the Attorney General, shall, subject to the availability of appropriations, establish a pilot program to assess the feasibility of deploying approved counter-UAS mitigation systems, equipment, and technology capable of mitigating unmanned aircraft and unmanned aircraft systems for purposes of responding to a credible threat caused by unauthorized unmanned aircraft system activity impacting airport operations. The pilot program shall include deployment and operation of approved counter-UAS mitigation systems, equipment, or technology at up to 5 covered airports not later than 2 years after the publication of the performance requirements described in section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code. The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may, subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Secretary and Administrator determine necessary, authorize a law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over an airport to deploy and operate approved counter-UAS mitigation systems, equipment, or technology at 2 of the covered airports under subparagraph (A). The Secretary shall coordinate with the Administrator and the Attorney General to develop a list of covered airports eligible for inclusion in the pilot program, based on the suitability of each such airport for counter-UAS system, equipment, or technology deployment. The Administrator shall, in consultation with the Federal Communications Commission, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and other Federal agencies as appropriate, conduct site-specific spectrum and suitability assessments for each selected airport under the program, based on the specific counter-UAS mitigation systems, equipment, or technology to be deployed, prior to the operation of such systems at each selected airport. No activity to mitigate the operation of an unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system under the pilot program may be carried out without authorization from both the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Administrator. The Secretary of Homeland Security or the Administrator, may, on a case-by-case basis, authorize an emergency, temporary deployment and operation of systems, equipment, or technology capable of mitigating unmanned aircraft and unmanned aircraft systems to a public airport (as defined under section 47102 of title 49, United States Code) not participating in the pilot program for purposes of responding to a persistent disruption of air traffic operations caused by unauthorized unmanned aircraft system activity. Prior to the deployment and operation of a counter-UAS detection or mitigation system, equipment, or technology at an airport as described in subsection (b) and paragraph (1) of subsection (c), the Secretary and the Administrator shall coordinate with airport personnel, including the exclusive bargaining representative of air traffic controllers certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code, State law enforcement, and other relevant stakeholders to develop a site-specific plan for the use of counter-UAS detection and mitigation systems, equipment, or technology at such airport. A plan required under paragraph (1) shall include— roles and responsibilities of— Federal agency personnel, including air traffic control personnel; airport law enforcement and security personnel; State law enforcement personnel; other relevant airport personnel, as determined by the Secretary and the Administrator; and any other stakeholder in a terminal airspace the Secretary and Administrator determine appropriate; operational procedures, protocols, policies, and guidelines pertaining to the deployment, use, and maintenance of such systems, equipment, or technology; the operational approval process by which such systems, equipment, or technology may be actively deployed and operated; reporting requirements associated with the use of such systems, equipment, or technology; initial and recurring counter-UAS operator training requirements; information-sharing mechanisms to provide airports with timely access to data and information obtained from counter-UAS equipment; appropriate consideration of, and updates to, counter-UAS emergency response plans for an airport; and any other content as determined necessary by the Secretary and the Administrator. No Federal agency may require an airport operator to procure, acquire, deploy, or operate an approved counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology, or approved counter-UAS mitigation system, equipment, or technology for or on behalf of the Federal agency. If the Administrator finds that an airport acquired and operated a counter-UAS detection system, equipment, or technology prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator may authorize the use of such system, equipment, or technology under this subsection if— such system, equipment, or technology meets the minimum performance requirements issued pursuant to section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code; and such airport agrees to such terms and conditions as the Administrator may prescribe under this subsection. In this section: The term approved counter-UAS detection system means a system approved under section 210G(b)(4) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(b)(4)) and that meets the minimum performance requirements established pursuant to section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code. The term approved counter-UAS mitigation system means a system approved under section 210G(b)(4) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n(b)(4)) and that meets the minimum performance requirements established pursuant to section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code.

8. UAS detection and mitigation enforcement authority Chapter 448 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: No person may carelessly or recklessly operate a system, equipment, or technology to detect, identify, monitor, track, or mitigate an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft in a manner that adversely impacts or interferes with safe airport operations, navigation, or air traffic services, or the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system. The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may take such action as may be necessary to address the adverse impacts or interference of operations that violate paragraph (1). The term person as used in this section does not include— the Federal Government or any bureau, department, instrumentality, or other agency of the Federal Government; or an officer, employee, or contractor of the Federal Government or any bureau, department, instrumentality, or other agency of the Federal Government if the officer, employee, or contractor is authorized by the Federal Government or any bureau, department, instrumentality, or other agency of the Federal Government to operate a system or technology referred to in subsection (a)(1). Section 46301(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (5) of subsection (a), the maximum civil penalty for a violation of section 44815 committed by a person described in such section, including an individual or small business concern, shall be the maximum civil penalty authorized under subsection (a)(1) of this section for persons other than an individual or small business concern. The analysis for chapter 448 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 44815.Unmanned aircraft system detection and mitigation enforcement (a)Prohibition (1)In generalNo person may carelessly or recklessly operate a system, equipment, or technology to detect, identify, monitor, track, or mitigate an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft in a manner that adversely impacts or interferes with safe airport operations, navigation, or air traffic services, or the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system. (2)Actions by the AdministratorThe Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may take such action as may be necessary to address the adverse impacts or interference of operations that violate paragraph (1). (b)Rule of constructionThe term person as used in this section does not include— (1)the Federal Government or any bureau, department, instrumentality, or other agency of the Federal Government; or (2)an officer, employee, or contractor of the Federal Government or any bureau, department, instrumentality, or other agency of the Federal Government if the officer, employee, or contractor is authorized by the Federal Government or any bureau, department, instrumentality, or other agency of the Federal Government to operate a system or technology referred to in subsection (a)(1).. (9)Penalties relating to the operation of unmanned aircraft system detection and mitigation technologiesNotwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (5) of subsection (a), the maximum civil penalty for a violation of section 44815 committed by a person described in such section, including an individual or small business concern, shall be the maximum civil penalty authorized under subsection (a)(1) of this section for persons other than an individual or small business concern.. 44815. Unmanned aircraft system detection and mitigation enforcement.

44815. Unmanned aircraft system detection and mitigation enforcement No person may carelessly or recklessly operate a system, equipment, or technology to detect, identify, monitor, track, or mitigate an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft in a manner that adversely impacts or interferes with safe airport operations, navigation, or air traffic services, or the safe and efficient operation of the national airspace system. The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may take such action as may be necessary to address the adverse impacts or interference of operations that violate paragraph (1). The term person as used in this section does not include— the Federal Government or any bureau, department, instrumentality, or other agency of the Federal Government; or an officer, employee, or contractor of the Federal Government or any bureau, department, instrumentality, or other agency of the Federal Government if the officer, employee, or contractor is authorized by the Federal Government or any bureau, department, instrumentality, or other agency of the Federal Government to operate a system or technology referred to in subsection (a)(1).

9. Reporting on counter-UAS activities Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Attorney General, a public report summarizing the results of all counter-UAS detection and mitigation activities conducted pursuant to this Act during the previous year. The report under subsection (a) shall contain— to the extent unrelated to any pending criminal proceedings, information on any violation of, or failure to comply with, this Act or the amendments made by this Act by personnel authorized to conduct detection and mitigation activities, including a description of any such violation or failure; data on the number of detection activities conducted, the number of mitigation activities conducted, and the number of instances of communications interception from an unmanned aircraft system; whether any unmanned aircraft that experienced mitigation was engaged in First Amendment-protected activities, and whether any unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft systems were properly or improperly seized, disabled, damaged, or destroyed as well as methods used to seize, disable, damage, or destroy such aircraft or systems; and a description of the efforts of the Federal Government to protect privacy and civil liberties when carrying out counter-UAS detection and mitigation activities. The Secretary shall submit each report under subsection (a) in unclassified form and post such report on a publicly available website.

10. Drone safety statement modernization Section 44805 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— in subsection (h) by inserting (excluding requirements under subsection (i)) after requirements of this section; and by adding at the end the following: The manufacturer of a small unmanned aircraft system shall— make available to the initial operator of such system the safety statement described in paragraph (2) at the time such operator activates such system for the first time; and require such operator to electronically acknowledge that the operator has read and understands each component of the safety statement. The Administrator shall develop, maintain, and periodically review and revise requirements for the safety statement required under paragraph (1). Such statement shall include— information on, and sources of, laws and regulations applicable to the operation of small unmanned aircraft systems, including— authorizations or regulations depending on the type of operation an individual is conducting and the qualifications or certification of the individual operating such system; and requirements regarding the operation of a small unmanned aircraft system under section 44809; information on temporary flight restrictions, airspace restrictions specific to unmanned aircraft systems, and other types of airspace restrictions; methods approved by the Administrator for determining whether the operation of a small unmanned aircraft system in particular airspace is lawful or unlawful; recommendations for using small unmanned aircraft systems in a manner that promotes the safety of persons and property; potential consequences for operating a small unmanned aircraft system in an unsafe or unlawful manner, including— potential consequences for operating such system in restricted airspace; and any enforcement action the Administrator may pursue against an individual operating a small unmanned aircraft system who endangers the safety of the national airspace system; and the date on which the safety statement was created or last modified. Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator shall issue and thereafter maintain an example safety statement that satisfies the requirements of paragraph (2). The Administrator may not require a manufacturer of a small unmanned aircraft system to use the example statement issued and maintained under subparagraph (A). Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall review and revise the example safety statement for small unmanned aircraft systems as required under section 44805(i)(3)(A) of title 49, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)). Section 2203 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (49 U.S.C. 44801 note) and the item relating to such section in section 1(b) of such Act are repealed. (i)Safety statements (1)In generalThe manufacturer of a small unmanned aircraft system shall— (A)make available to the initial operator of such system the safety statement described in paragraph (2) at the time such operator activates such system for the first time; and (B)require such operator to electronically acknowledge that the operator has read and understands each component of the safety statement. (2)RequirementsThe Administrator shall develop, maintain, and periodically review and revise requirements for the safety statement required under paragraph (1). Such statement shall include— (A)information on, and sources of, laws and regulations applicable to the operation of small unmanned aircraft systems, including— (i)authorizations or regulations depending on the type of operation an individual is conducting and the qualifications or certification of the individual operating such system; and (ii)requirements regarding the operation of a small unmanned aircraft system under section 44809; (B)information on temporary flight restrictions, airspace restrictions specific to unmanned aircraft systems, and other types of airspace restrictions; (C)methods approved by the Administrator for determining whether the operation of a small unmanned aircraft system in particular airspace is lawful or unlawful; (D)recommendations for using small unmanned aircraft systems in a manner that promotes the safety of persons and property; (E)potential consequences for operating a small unmanned aircraft system in an unsafe or unlawful manner, including— (i)potential consequences for operating such system in restricted airspace; and (ii)any enforcement action the Administrator may pursue against an individual operating a small unmanned aircraft system who endangers the safety of the national airspace system; and (F)the date on which the safety statement was created or last modified. (3)Example statement (A)In generalNot later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, the Administrator shall issue and thereafter maintain an example safety statement that satisfies the requirements of paragraph (2). (B)RestrictionThe Administrator may not require a manufacturer of a small unmanned aircraft system to use the example statement issued and maintained under subparagraph (A)..

11. Applicability Section 553 and 554 of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to any determinations made or guidance issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, or the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration under— section 5 or 6 of this Act; subsection (b)(4) and subsection (n) of section 210G of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 124n); or section 44810(e) of title 49, United States Code.