HR5061-119

Reported

Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act

119th Congress Introduced Aug 29, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill updates counter-unmanned aircraft system authority. It defines covered airports, covered sites, covered events, covered entities, covered facilities, and appropriate congressional committees. It extends and modifies authority for DHS and DOJ to protect facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft systems, including detection, identification, monitoring, tracking, warning, seizure, control, disablement, damage, or destruction when authorized. It also adds FAA counter-UAS authority to detect or mitigate credible threats to safe airport operations and to test systems for interference with aircraft navigation, air traffic services, and the national airspace system.

The bill creates additional limited detection authority for covered sites and events, establishes a counter-UAS mitigation law-enforcement pilot program for state and covered local law enforcement agencies, and requires planning and deployment work at covered airports. It bars careless or reckless operation of counter-UAS systems that interferes with safe airport operations, navigation, air traffic services, or the national airspace system, and creates enforcement authority and civil penalties. It requires annual public reporting by DHS, coordinated with FAA and DOJ, on detection and mitigation activities, violations, communications interceptions, First Amendment-protected activity, seizures or destruction of drones, and privacy and civil-liberties protections. It also modernizes drone safety statements.

Who Benefits and How

Large hub airports, medium hub airports, major cargo airports, amusement park operators, critical infrastructure operators, state prison operators, 2026 FIFA World Cup host cities, and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games region benefit from clearer access to counter-UAS detection or mitigation pathways. DHS, DOJ, FAA, and Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers benefit from reauthorized authorities and training roles. U.S. counter-UAS equipment manufacturers benefit from demand for approved systems and restrictions on foreign-adversary technology. Event security companies and airport security contractors benefit from planning and deployment work. The public benefits if unauthorized drone threats near airports, critical infrastructure, prisons, and major events are detected or mitigated safely.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Drone operators near protected sites, airports, and major events face greater risk of warning, seizure, disablement, damage, destruction, or enforcement. Private counter-UAS system operators and non-federal counter-UAS operators must avoid careless or reckless operations that interfere with aviation safety. State and local law enforcement agencies in the pilot program must submit applications, justify need, follow training and protocols, coordinate with DHS, DOJ, and FAA, and protect privacy and civil liberties. DHS, DOJ, FAA, and airport operators must manage planning, approvals, oversight, reporting, privacy safeguards, and civil-liberties reviews. Foreign adversary counter-UAS companies face procurement and deployment barriers.

Key Provisions

  • Defines covered airports, covered sites, covered events, covered entities, covered facilities, and appropriate congressional committees.
  • Reauthorizes DHS and DOJ counter-UAS detection and mitigation authorities for protected facilities and assets.
  • Provides FAA counter-UAS authority to address credible threats to the national airspace system and test counter-UAS technology.
  • Establishes additional limited detection authority for covered sites and covered events.
  • Creates a state and covered local law-enforcement counter-UAS mitigation pilot program.
  • Requires counter-UAS planning and deployment work at covered airports.
  • Prohibits careless or reckless counter-UAS operations that interfere with aviation safety and establishes enforcement authority.
  • Requires annual public reporting on counter-UAS activities, privacy, civil liberties, and First Amendment impacts.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Reauthorizes and expands federal counter-UAS authorities for DHS, DOJ, and FAA; defines covered airports, sites, events, and entities; restricts foreign-adversary systems; creates detection and mitigation authority, an airport planning program, a state and local mitigation pilot, enforcement rules, annual public reporting, and drone-safety statement modernization.

Key Policy Areas

Drones, Homeland Security, Aviation Safety, Law Enforcement, Critical Infrastructure

Primary Purpose

Reauthorizes and expands federal counter-UAS authorities for DHS, DOJ, and FAA; defines covered airports, sites, events, and entities; restricts foreign-adversary systems; creates detection and mitigation authority, an airport planning program, a state and local mitigation pilot, enforcement rules, annual public reporting, and drone-safety statement modernization.

Policy Domains

Drones Homeland Security Aviation Safety Law Enforcement Critical Infrastructure

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Large hub airports
  • Medium hub airports
  • Major cargo airports
  • Amusement park operators
  • Critical infrastructure operators
  • State prison operators
  • 2026 FIFA World Cup host cities
  • 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games region
  • DHS counter-UAS staff
  • DOJ counter-UAS staff
  • FAA safety staff
  • U.S. counter-UAS equipment manufacturers
  • Event security companies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FAA safety staff: , , , , , , , ,
Large hub airports: , , , , , , , ,
Medium hub airports: , , , , , , , ,
Major cargo airports: , , , , , , , ,
DHS counter-UAS staff: , , , , , , , ,
DOJ counter-UAS staff: , , , , , , , ,
State prison operators: , , , , , , , ,
Amusement park operators: , , , , , , , ,
Event security companies: , , , , , , , ,
2026 FIFA World Cup host cities: , , , , , , , ,
Critical infrastructure operators: , , , , , , , ,
2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games region: , , , , , , , ,
U.S. counter-UAS equipment manufacturers: , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Drone operators near protected sites
  • Drone operators near airports
  • Drone operators at major events
  • Private counter-UAS system operators
  • Non-federal counter-UAS operators
  • State law enforcement agencies in the pilot program
  • Local law enforcement agencies in the pilot program
  • DHS reporting staff
  • DOJ oversight staff
  • FAA airport safety staff
  • Foreign adversary counter-UAS companies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DHS reporting staff: , , , , , , , ,
DOJ oversight staff: , , , , , , , ,
FAA airport safety staff: , , , , , , , ,
Drone operators near airports: , , , , , , , ,
Drone operators at major events: , , , , , , , ,
Non-federal counter-UAS operators: , , , , , , , ,
Drone operators near protected sites: , , , , , , , ,
Private counter-UAS system operators: , , , , , , , ,
Foreign adversary counter-UAS companies: , , , , , , , ,
Local law enforcement agencies in the pilot program: , , , , , , , ,
State law enforcement agencies in the pilot program: , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 3, 2025

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

Sep 3, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Sep 3, 2025

Subcommittee on Aviation Discharged

Sep 2, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

Sep 1, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.

Aug 29, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in …

Aug 29, 2025

Introduced in House

Aug 29, 2025

Mr. Garbarino (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Graves, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Defense
10 mentions across 6 clauses
+5 positive -5 negative

Chinese counter-UAS manufacturers, Counter-UAS detection and mitigation system manufacturers, Counter-UAS detection system manufacturers

Positive-direction: Counter-UAS detection and mitigation system manufacturers, Counter-UAS detection system manufacturers, Counter-UAS mitigation system manufacturers, U.S. counter-UAS system manufacturers, U.S.-based counter-UAS equipment manufacturers

Negative-direction: Chinese counter-UAS manufacturers, Foreign adversary technology companies, Small UAS manufacturers

Government
9 mentions across 6 clauses
+8 positive -1 negative

Authorized counter-UAS operators, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice

Department of Homeland Security faces effects in multiple directions

Transportation
6 mentions across 4 clauses
+6 positive

Commercial UAS operators, Large and medium hub airports, Large hub airports

Recreational Goods
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+1 positive -5 negative

Drone consumers, Drone operators, Drone operators at major events

Positive-direction: Drone consumers

Negative-direction: Drone operators, Drone operators at major events, Drone operators near airports, Drone operators near protected sites, Recreational drone operators near protected sites

State & Local Government
5 mentions across 3 clauses
+4 positive -1 negative

2026 FIFA World Cup host cities, 2028 Olympic Games host region (Los Angeles), State and local law enforcement agencies in major cities

Positive-direction: 2026 FIFA World Cup host cities, 2028 Olympic Games host region (Los Angeles), State and local law enforcement agencies in major cities, State prison operators

Negative-direction: State and local law enforcement operating counter-UAS

Security Services
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative

Airport security contractors, Event security companies, Non-federal counter-UAS system operators

Positive-direction: Airport security contractors, Event security companies

Negative-direction: Non-federal counter-UAS system operators, Private counter-UAS system operators

Utilities
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Critical infrastructure operators (oil refineries, chemical facilities, energy facilities)

Amusement Parks
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Amusement park operators

11/13
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Drones Homeland Security Aviation Safety Law Enforcement Critical Infrastructure
Actor Mappings
"dhs"
→ Department of Homeland Security
"doj"
→ Department of Justice
"faa"
→ Federal Aviation Administration

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology