HR4881-119

In Committee

SWIFT VOTE Act

119th Congress Introduced Aug 5, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The SWIFT VOTE Act gives the Election Assistance Commission one year to make grants to eligible jurisdictions for electronic pollbooks or for the capability to collect and disseminate federal-election wait-time information. EAC must prioritize jurisdictions with demonstrated need for new or additional e-pollbooks to reduce polling-place wait times and jurisdictions proposing wait-time reporting. Jurisdictions seeking wait-time funding must certify that the chief election official will publish current wait times on an official public website: hourly for polling places open four hours or fewer, and at least four regular intervals for polling places open more than four hours. After each election cycle, the jurisdiction must publish a report on wait times on election day and in-person early voting days to the extent available. Grantees must supplement rather than supplant other funding, report to EAC on e-pollbook procurement and maintenance, develop procedures showing compliance with EAC's Voluntary Electronic Poll Book Certification Program or a successor program, and work with voting-system technology experts on training that serves voters with limited English proficiency and voters with disabilities. The bill authorizes $120 million, available until expended.

Who Benefits and How

Voters at crowded polling places benefit if electronic pollbooks and wait-time reporting reduce check-in bottlenecks. Voters with limited English proficiency benefit because required training must address their needs. Voters with disabilities benefit because election-official training must address accessibility needs. Eligible election jurisdictions benefit from federal funding for e-pollbook procurement, maintenance, and wait-time systems. Election technology vendors benefit from grant-funded demand for certified electronic pollbooks and wait-time reporting tools.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Election Assistance Commission must administer $120 million in grants within one year and prioritize need-based applications. Chief election officials must publish live wait-time information and post-election wait-time reports. Local election offices must provide regular EAC reports and maintain certification procedures for e-pollbooks. Election officials must complete training on e-pollbook use and voter service for disabled voters and limited-English voters. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of the grant authorization.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes $120 million for EAC grants for electronic pollbooks and wait-time information systems.
  • Prioritizes jurisdictions with demonstrated need to reduce federal-election polling-place wait times.
  • Requires public wait-time updates hourly or at least four times per day depending on polling-place hours.
  • Requires election-cycle wait-time reports and EAC procurement and maintenance reporting.
  • Requires certification compliance and training for voters with limited English proficiency and disabilities.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Authorizes $120 million for Election Assistance Commission grants to eligible state and local election jurisdictions to procure or maintain electronic pollbooks and develop polling-place wait-time information systems, with website publication, election-cycle reports, certification, training, and supplement-not-supplant requirements.

Key Policy Areas

Elections, Voting Access, Technology

Primary Purpose

Authorizes $120 million for Election Assistance Commission grants to eligible state and local election jurisdictions to procure or maintain electronic pollbooks and develop polling-place wait-time information systems, with website publication, election-cycle reports, certification, training, and supplement-not-supplant requirements.

Policy Domains

Elections Voting Access Technology

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Polling-place voters
  • Limited-English voters
  • Voters with disabilities
  • Eligible election jurisdictions
  • Election technology vendors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Polling-place voters:
Limited-English voters:
Voters with disabilities:
Election technology vendors:
Eligible election jurisdictions:
Identified Costs
  • Election Assistance Commission
  • Chief election officials
  • Local election offices
  • Poll worker trainers
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers:
Poll worker trainers:
Local election offices:
Chief election officials:
Election Assistance Commission:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Aug 5, 2025

Ms. Crockett (for herself, Ms. Williams of Georgia, Mr. Deluzio, …

Aug 5, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.

Aug 5, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -2 negative

Chief election officials, Election Assistance Commission, Eligible election jurisdictions

Positive-direction: Eligible election jurisdictions

Negative-direction: Chief election officials, Election Assistance Commission

Voting Rights
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Limited-English voters, Polling-place voters

Disability Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Voters with disabilities

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Election technology vendors

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Local election offices

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Elections Voting Access Technology

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology