FASTER Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The FASTER Act requires recurring DHS assessment and expedited correction of southern border tactical infrastructure deficiencies. Within 180 days after enactment and every two years after that, the DHS Secretary must survey existing tactical infrastructure along the southern border. Each survey must measure the number of border miles without tactical infrastructure, describe structural deficiencies in existing infrastructure, and describe technology deficiencies. Within 90 days after each survey, DHS must report findings and results to the House Homeland Security Committee and Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in unclassified format, with a classified annex if appropriate. If a survey identifies a deficiency, DHS must take necessary actions to correct it in an expedited manner, including exercising section 102(c) authority under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act to waive all legal requirements. A deficiency means tactical infrastructure or technology that is not operational or cannot serve its intended purpose because of damage, deterioration, or unmet maintenance or repair.
Who Benefits and How
Border Patrol operational planners benefit from biennial data on missing miles, structural problems, and technology deficiencies. DHS border infrastructure offices benefit from explicit authority to correct identified deficiencies quickly. Congressional homeland security committees benefit from recurring reports on tactical infrastructure status. Border security contractors benefit if surveys trigger repair, maintenance, or technology work.
Who Bears the Burden and How
DHS Secretary must conduct surveys, submit reports, and take corrective action for identified deficiencies. Environmental review stakeholders may lose procedural leverage when DHS uses IIRIRA section 102(c) waiver authority. Federal land managers along the southern border may face expedited infrastructure work that waives legal requirements. Federal taxpayers bear costs for biennial surveys and repairs to tactical infrastructure or technology.
Key Provisions
- Requires DHS to survey southern border tactical infrastructure within 180 days and biennially thereafter.
- Requires each survey to measure border miles without infrastructure and describe structural and technology deficiencies.
- Requires a report to House and Senate homeland security committees within 90 days after each survey.
- Directs DHS to correct deficiencies in an expedited manner, including through IIRIRA section 102(c) waiver authority.
- Defines deficiencies as nonoperational infrastructure or technology unable to serve its purpose because of damage, deterioration, or unmet maintenance or repair.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires DHS to survey southern border tactical infrastructure within 180 days and biennially thereafter, report within 90 days on missing miles and structural or technology deficiencies, and use necessary actions including IIRIRA section 102(c) legal-waiver authority to correct deficiencies quickly.
Key Policy Areas
Border Security, DHS, Environmental Waivers
Primary Purpose
Requires DHS to survey southern border tactical infrastructure within 180 days and biennially thereafter, report within 90 days on missing miles and structural or technology deficiencies, and use necessary actions including IIRIRA section 102(c) legal-waiver authority to correct deficiencies quickly.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Border Patrol operational planners
- DHS border infrastructure offices
- Congressional homeland security committees
- Border security contractors
Identified Costs
- DHS Secretary
- Environmental review stakeholders
- Federal land managers along the southern border
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself and Mr. Weber …
Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
DHS Secretary, DHS border infrastructure offices
Federal land managers along the southern border
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology