HR4676-119

In Committee

Modern Firearm Safety Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 23, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill defines congressional findings declaring that state and local handgun design requirements limit selection, inflate prices, create safety concerns, violate the Second Amendment, and restrain interstate commerce and amends Section 927 of title 18 to prohibit federal, state, and local governments from requiring handguns to incorporate design features not mandated by federal law, including loaded-chamber indicators, magazine. It relies on definition changes and exemptions. The main policy areas are Firearms Regulation and Trade.

Who Benefits and How

Handgun manufacturers could face lower compliance burdens, Firearms retailers in states with strict handgun requirements could gain revenue opportunities, and Gun owners in California and other restrictive states could see lower costs.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State and local governments with handgun safety requirements would be affected, State and local governments with strict gun laws would be affected, and Gun safety advocacy organizations would be affected.

Key Provisions

  • Defines congressional findings declaring that state and local handgun design requirements limit selection, inflate prices, create safety concerns, violate the Second Amendment, and restrain interstate commerce.
  • Amends Section 927 of title 18 to prohibit federal, state, and local governments from requiring handguns to incorporate design features not mandated by federal law, including loaded-chamber indicators, magazine...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill defines congressional findings declaring that state and local handgun design requirements limit selection, inflate prices, create safety concerns, violate the Second Amendment, and restrain interstate commerce and amends Section 927 of title 18 to prohibit federal, state, and local governments from requiring handguns to incorporate design features not mandated by federal law, including loaded-chamber indicators, magazine.

Key Policy Areas

Firearms Regulation, Trade

Primary Purpose

The bill defines congressional findings declaring that state and local handgun design requirements limit selection, inflate prices, create safety concerns, violate the Second Amendment, and restrain interstate commerce and amends Section 927 of title 18 to prohibit federal, state, and local governments from requiring handguns to incorporate design features not mandated by federal law, including loaded-chamber indicators, magazine.

Policy Domains

Firearms Regulation Trade

Modern Firearm Safety Act

Identified Gains
  • Handgun manufacturers
  • Firearms retailers in states with strict handgun requirements
  • Gun owners in California and other restrictive states
  • Gun manufacturers
  • Gun owners in states with handgun roster restrictions
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Gun manufacturers:
Handgun manufacturers:
Gun owners in California and other restrictive states:
Gun owners in states with handgun roster restrictions:
Firearms retailers in states with strict handgun requirements:
Identified Costs
  • State and local governments with handgun safety requirements
  • State and local governments with strict gun laws
  • Gun safety advocacy organizations
  • Law enforcement agencies using microstamping for crime solving
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Gun safety advocacy organizations:
State and local governments with strict gun laws:
State and local governments with handgun safety requirements:
Law enforcement agencies using microstamping for crime solving:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 23, 2025

Mr. Issa (for himself, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Collins, Mr. Gooden, …

Jul 23, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Jul 23, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Manufacturing
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Gun manufacturers, Handgun manufacturers

Consumers
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Gun owners in California and other restrictive states, Gun owners in states with handgun roster restrictions

State & Local Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

State and local governments with handgun safety requirements, State and local governments with strict gun laws

Sporting Goods Stores
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Firearms retailers in states with strict handgun requirements

Advocacy Groups
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Gun safety advocacy organizations

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Firearms Regulation Trade

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology