To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 with respect to the authorized use of certain user fees collected for recreation sites, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill expands use of recreation site user fees to any site within the same civil works project, rather than limiting fees to the site where collected. It relies on definition changes and spending auth. The main policy areas are Recreation and Social Welfare.
Who Benefits and How
Recreation facilities at Army Corps civil works projects could gain revenue opportunities, Army Corps of Engineers recreation management could face fewer barriers, and Local recreation visitors at Lake Lanier would be affected.
Who Bears the Burden and How
No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.
Key Provisions
- Expands use of recreation site user fees to any site within the same civil works project, rather than limiting fees to the site where collected.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill expands use of recreation site user fees to any site within the same civil works project, rather than limiting fees to the site where collected.
Key Policy Areas
Recreation, Social Welfare
Primary Purpose
The bill expands use of recreation site user fees to any site within the same civil works project, rather than limiting fees to the site where collected.
Policy Domains
Section 1 - Short Title
Identified Gains
- Recreation facilities at Army Corps civil works projects
- Army Corps of Engineers recreation management
- Local recreation visitors at Lake Lanier
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Clyde (for himself and Mr. McCormick) introduced the following …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Recreation facilities at Army Corps civil works projects
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_secretary"
- → Secretary of the Army (Corps of Engineers)
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
A water resources project (dam, lake, reservoir) operated by the Army Corps of Engineers
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology