To prohibit the use of Federal funds to hire armed Federal regulatory enforcement officers in certain agencies.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill, To prohibit the use of Federal funds to hire armed Federal regulatory enforcement officers in certain agencies., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users. The main policy domain is Environment, Government Operations, Labor.
Who Benefits and How
environmental regulators and natural-resource users may benefit from new authority, funding, eligibility, regulatory clarity, or reduced risk created by the bill.
Who Bears the Burden and How
federal implementing agencies, environmental regulators and natural-resource users may take on implementation duties, reporting obligations, compliance costs, or oversight responsibilities.
Key Provisions
- Section H05358C31F59542D89C4CEDF7D4FCE66F: 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the No Funds for Armed Regulators Act of 2023.
- Section H6B9483656D554A13A5ED25B23830FA74: 2. Prohibition on armed Federal regulatory enforcement officers No Federal funds may be used to hire or retain armed Federal regulatory enforcement officers in...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
This bill, To prohibit the use of Federal funds to hire armed Federal regulatory enforcement officers in certain agencies., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users.
Key Policy Areas
Environment, Government Operations, Labor
Primary Purpose
This bill, To prohibit the use of Federal funds to hire armed Federal regulatory enforcement officers in certain agencies., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- environmental regulators and natural-resource users
Identified Costs
- federal implementing agencies
- environmental regulators and natural-resource users
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Higgins of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. Duncan, Mrs. Boebert, …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "federal_implementing_agencies"
- → Federal agencies assigned duties by the bill
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology