HR4372-119

Introduced

To amend title 10 to shorten breach reporting timelines, increase program transparency, and improve congressional oversight of Department of Defense cost overruns with respect to the cost growth for major systems, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jul 14, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill requires shortens Nunn-McCurdy breach report timeline by requiring Secretary to submit breach notifications to Congress within 30 days of determination, requires Secretary of Defense to designate end items requiring over $500 million in lifecycle costs as major subprograms for acquisition reporting purposes, and mandates program termination for major defense acquisition programs with more than one critical cost breach, requires public disclosure of breach reports, prohibits delegation of certification authority, and establishes. It relies on reporting requirements, deadline tightening, classification req, and termination mandate. The main policy areas are Defense.

Who Benefits and How

Congress would be affected and Taxpayers would be affected.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Programs with repeated cost overruns would be affected, Defense contractors would be affected, and Defense contractors with cost overruns would be affected.

Key Provisions

  • Requires shortens Nunn-McCurdy breach report timeline by requiring Secretary to submit breach notifications to Congress within 30 days of determination.
  • Requires Secretary of Defense to designate end items requiring over $500 million in lifecycle costs as major subprograms for acquisition reporting purposes.
  • Mandates program termination for major defense acquisition programs with more than one critical cost breach, requires public disclosure of breach reports, prohibits delegation of certification authority, and establishes...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill requires shortens Nunn-McCurdy breach report timeline by requiring Secretary to submit breach notifications to Congress within 30 days of determination, requires Secretary of Defense to designate end items requiring over $500 million in lifecycle costs as major subprograms for acquisition reporting purposes, and mandates program termination for major defense acquisition programs with more than one critical cost breach, requires public disclosure of breach reports, prohibits delegation of certification authority, and establishes.

Key Policy Areas

Defense

Primary Purpose

The bill requires shortens Nunn-McCurdy breach report timeline by requiring Secretary to submit breach notifications to Congress within 30 days of determination, requires Secretary of Defense to designate end items requiring over $500 million in lifecycle costs as major subprograms for acquisition reporting purposes, and mandates program termination for major defense acquisition programs with more than one critical cost breach, requires public disclosure of breach reports, prohibits delegation of certification authority, and establishes.

Policy Domains

Defense

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Congress
  • Taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Congress: , ,
Taxpayers:
Identified Costs
  • Programs with repeated cost overruns
  • Defense contractors
  • Defense contractors with cost overruns
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Defense contractors:
Programs with repeated cost overruns:
Defense contractors with cost overruns:

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 14, 2025

Mr. Garamendi (for himself, Mr. Gimenez, Ms. Jacobs, Mr. Deluzio, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Defense
7 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Defense contractors, Defense contractors with cost overruns, Department of Defense

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Congress

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Taxpayers

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology