HR4366-119

Passed House

Save Local Business Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 14, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Save Local Business Act changes the federal joint-employer standard under two major labor statutes. It amends the National Labor Relations Act so an employer may be treated as a joint employer of another employer's workers only if each employer directly, actually, and immediately exercises significant control over essential terms and conditions of employment. The bill lists examples of those essential terms: hiring, firing, pay and benefits, day-to-day supervision, work schedules, job positions, tasks, and discipline. It then applies the same standard to the Fair Labor Standards Act for wage-and-hour purposes.

The practical effect is to make indirect influence, reserved contractual authority, brand standards, routine quality controls, or ordinary business-to-business oversight less likely to create joint-employer status unless the putative joint employer actually controls core employment decisions in a direct and immediate way. That matters for franchising, staffing, subcontracting, logistics, construction, hospitality, and other business models where one company contracts with another company whose employees perform work connected to the first company's operations.

Who Benefits and How

Franchise brands benefit because brand standards and business guidance are less likely to trigger joint-employer bargaining duties or wage liability without direct control over workers. Lead companies using subcontracted labor benefit from reduced exposure to joint-employer claims. Staffing agencies, subcontracting employers, franchisees, small business owners, logistics contractors, construction contractors, and hospitality franchisors benefit from clearer boundaries around who is responsible for NLRA bargaining obligations and FLSA wage-and-hour liability.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Workers seeking joint liability, workers seeking bargaining leverage across franchise systems, labor unions organizing franchise structures, labor unions organizing contractor structures, the National Labor Relations Board, Department of Labor wage-hour enforcement staff, and plaintiffs' attorneys bear burdens because they must prove direct, actual, immediate, and significant control over core employment terms before a second business can be held responsible. The bill can reduce recovery options, restrict bargaining pressure, and require more evidence about hiring, firing, pay, scheduling, supervision, and discipline.

Key Provisions

  • Amends the NLRA employer definition to require direct, actual, immediate, and significant control for joint-employer status.
  • Amends the Fair Labor Standards Act employer definition to use the same direct-control joint-employer standard.
  • Limits joint-employer status to control over hiring, firing, pay, benefits, supervision, scheduling, job assignments, or discipline.
  • Restricts broader joint-employer theories based on indirect influence or reserved authority alone.
  • Provides a narrower statutory standard for franchising, staffing, subcontracting, and similar business arrangements.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Narrows when businesses can be treated as joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act and Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring each employer to exercise direct, actual, immediate, and significant control over essential employment terms.

Key Policy Areas

Labor, Small Business, Franchising

Primary Purpose

Narrows when businesses can be treated as joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act and Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring each employer to exercise direct, actual, immediate, and significant control over essential employment terms.

Policy Domains

Labor Small Business Franchising

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Franchise brands
  • Lead companies using subcontracted labor
  • Staffing agencies
  • Subcontracting employers
  • Franchisees
  • Small business owners
  • Logistics contractors
  • Construction contractors
  • Hospitality franchisors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Franchisees: ,
Franchise brands: ,
Staffing agencies: ,
Logistics contractors: ,
Small business owners: ,
Hospitality franchisors: ,
Construction contractors: ,
Subcontracting employers: ,
Lead companies using subcontracted labor: ,
Identified Costs
  • Workers seeking joint liability
  • Workers seeking bargaining leverage across franchise systems
  • Labor unions organizing franchise structures
  • Labor unions organizing contractor structures
  • National Labor Relations Board
  • Department of Labor wage-hour enforcement staff
  • Plaintiffs attorneys
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Plaintiffs attorneys: ,
National Labor Relations Board: ,
Workers seeking joint liability: ,
Labor unions organizing franchise structures: ,
Labor unions organizing contractor structures: ,
Department of Labor wage-hour enforcement staff: ,
Workers seeking bargaining leverage across franchise systems: ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 13, 2026

Rule H. Res. 988 passed House.

Jan 12, 2026

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 988 Reported to House. Rule …

Dec 30, 2025

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Dec 30, 2025

Additional sponsors: Mr. Hern of Oklahoma and Mr. Onder

Dec 30, 2025

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Dec 30, 2025

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 368.

Jul 23, 2025

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute …

Jul 23, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Jul 14, 2025

Introduced in House

Jul 14, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Professional Services
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive

Lead companies using subcontracted labor, Staffing agencies

Nonprofits
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-6 negative

Labor unions organizing contractor structures, Labor unions organizing franchise structures

Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
?6 uncertain

Department of Labor wage-hour enforcement staff, National Labor Relations Board

Small Business
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Franchise brands

Construction
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Subcontracting employers

General Public
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Workers seeking joint liability

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Labor Small Business Franchising
Actor Mappings
"dol"
→ Department of Labor
"nlrb"
→ National Labor Relations Board

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology