HR4246-119

Introduced

To amend section 41733 of title 49, United States Code, to require that applications to provide compensated basic essential air service include a contingency plan to continue air service in the event of a disruption, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jun 27, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Basic essential air service availability of compensation Section 41733(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4). It relies on compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Transportation.

Who Benefits and How

The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.

Who Bears the Burden and How

No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.

Key Provisions

  • Adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Basic essential air service availability of compensation Section 41733(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4)...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Basic essential air service availability of compensation Section 41733(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4).

Key Policy Areas

Transportation

Primary Purpose

The bill adds or tightens a compliance mandate provision: 2. Basic essential air service availability of compensation Section 41733(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4).

Policy Domains

Transportation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 27, 2025

Ms. Tokuda (for herself, Mr. Begich, Ms. Scholten, and Ms. …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Transportation
Actor Mappings
"secretary_of_transportation"
→ Secretary of Transportation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology