To regulate bump stocks in the same manner as machineguns.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires bump stocks Section 5845 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— in subsection (a), by striking and (8) a destructive device. It relies on definition changes, compliance mandates, and exemptions. The main policy areas are Energy Production, Energy, and Environment.
Who Benefits and How
Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens and Energy producers and energy supply-chain firms affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires bump stocks Section 5845 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— in subsection (a), by striking and (8) a destructive device.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires bump stocks Section 5845 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— in subsection (a), by striking and (8) a destructive device.
Key Policy Areas
Energy Production, Energy, Environment
Primary Purpose
The bill requires bump stocks Section 5845 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— in subsection (a), by striking and (8) a destructive device.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill
- Energy producers and energy supply-chain firms affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Titus (for herself, Mr. Kildee, and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology