Farmers Feeding America Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Farmers Feeding America Act expands The Emergency Food Assistance Program. It amends the Food and Nutrition Act to continue commodity availability through fiscal year 2030 and sets $500 million for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030. It amends the Emergency Food Assistance Act to raise storage and distribution funding from $100 million to $200 million, extend infrastructure grants through 2030, and address logistics for geographically isolated states. Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam can request USDA coordination on alternative delivery options so allocated commodities actually reach them, order commodities through the Department of Defense Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program, and receive the cash value of up to 20 percent of allocated commodities to procure domestically grown food instead. USDA may also consider product variety and transportation distance, not just lowest price, when buying fresh produce packages, while still trying to maximize nutritious food through the program.
Who Benefits and How
Food banks benefit from extended TEFAP commodity funding and doubled storage and distribution support. Low-income households benefit if TEFAP channels more nutritious food to emergency feeding organizations. Geographically isolated States benefit from alternative delivery options, DoD Fresh ordering, and limited cash-value procurement flexibility. Domestic farmers benefit from continued USDA commodity purchases and new procurement flexibility for domestically grown food.
Who Bears the Burden and How
USDA Food and Nutrition Service staff must administer higher TEFAP funding, infrastructure grants, fresh produce procurement factors, and isolated-state logistics. State distributing agencies must manage additional storage, distribution, infrastructure, and procurement flexibility. Federal taxpayers fund $500 million per year in commodities and the increased storage and distribution authorization. Lowest-price produce bidders may face competition from vendors offering greater variety or shorter transportation distance.
Key Provisions
- Extends TEFAP commodity availability through fiscal year 2030.
- Funds TEFAP commodities at $500 million annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
- Raises emergency food storage and distribution funding from $100 million to $200 million.
- Extends TEFAP infrastructure grants through 2030.
- Provides alternative delivery, DoD Fresh ordering, and 20-percent cash-value procurement options for geographically isolated States.
- Allows USDA to consider produce variety and transportation distance in fresh produce package contracts.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Extends TEFAP commodity funding through fiscal year 2030 at $500 million per year, doubles emergency food storage and distribution funding from $100 million to $200 million, extends infrastructure grants through 2030, and gives Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Northern Mariana Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam alternative delivery, DoD Fresh ordering, and limited cash-value procurement options for domestic food.
Key Policy Areas
Nutrition Assistance, Agriculture, Food Banks
Primary Purpose
Extends TEFAP commodity funding through fiscal year 2030 at $500 million per year, doubles emergency food storage and distribution funding from $100 million to $200 million, extends infrastructure grants through 2030, and gives Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Northern Mariana Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam alternative delivery, DoD Fresh ordering, and limited cash-value procurement options for domestic food.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Food banks
- Low-income households
- Geographically isolated States
- Domestic farmers
Identified Costs
- USDA Food and Nutrition Service staff
- State distributing agencies
- Federal taxpayers
- Lowest-price produce bidders
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMs. Salinas (for herself, Mr. Panetta, Ms. Balint, Mr. Carbajal, …
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Geographically isolated States, State distributing agencies
Domestic farmers, Lowest-price produce bidders
Positive-direction: Domestic farmers
Negative-direction: Lowest-price produce bidders
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology