HR3732-119

In Committee

BARK Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jun 4, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The BARK Act creates a pet-food analogue to food-donation liability protection. A person that donates apparently fit pet-related products in good faith to a state government, local government, or nonprofit for distribution to qualified animals is protected from civil or criminal liability arising from the product's nature, age, packaging, or condition. Nonprofits and governments receiving those products receive parallel protection when they distribute them. The shield does not apply when injury or death results from gross negligence or intentional misconduct. Donors of distressed or defective pet food or supplies that do not meet all quality or labeling standards can still receive protection if they disclose the condition, the recipient agrees to recondition the product before distribution, and the recipient knows the relevant standards. The bill defines covered products to include pet food and supplies, and qualified animals to include pets, emotional support animals, and service animals, while clarifying that it does not create liability or supersede state or local health regulations.

Who Benefits and How

Pet food donors benefit from reduced civil and criminal liability when donating apparently fit products in good faith. Animal shelters and rescue nonprofits benefit because liability protection makes it easier to receive and distribute donated pet supplies. Low-income pet owners benefit if more surplus pet food and supplies reach distribution channels. Service animal handlers benefit because the definition of qualified animal includes service animals.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Recipient nonprofits must recondition distressed or defective products when they agree to accept nonconforming donations. State governments and local governments must apply health standards while distributing or reconditioning donated products. Ultimate recipients remain exposed to product risks when gross negligence or intentional misconduct occurs. Pet-product manufacturers and retailers may need disclosure practices for distressed or defective donated inventory.

Key Provisions

  • Protects good-faith donors of apparently fit pet food and supplies from civil and criminal liability.
  • Extends parallel liability protection to recipient nonprofits, state governments, and local governments.
  • Requires disclosure and reconditioning agreements for distressed or defective donated products.
  • Preserves liability for gross negligence and intentional misconduct.
  • Defines qualified animals to include pets, emotional support animals, and service animals.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Extends good-faith donation liability protections to pet food and pet supplies donated to state governments, local governments, and nonprofit organizations for pets, emotional support animals, and service animals, while preserving liability for gross negligence, intentional misconduct, and state or local health rules.

Key Policy Areas

Animal Welfare, Nonprofits, Liability

Primary Purpose

Extends good-faith donation liability protections to pet food and pet supplies donated to state governments, local governments, and nonprofit organizations for pets, emotional support animals, and service animals, while preserving liability for gross negligence, intentional misconduct, and state or local health rules.

Policy Domains

Animal Welfare Nonprofits Liability

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Pet food donors
  • Animal shelters
  • Low-income pet owners
  • Service animal handlers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Animal shelters:
Pet food donors:
Low-income pet owners:
Service animal handlers:
Identified Costs
  • Recipient nonprofits
  • State governments
  • Local governments
  • Pet-product retailers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Local governments:
State governments:
Recipient nonprofits:
Pet-product retailers:

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 4, 2025

Mr. Raskin (for himself, Mrs. Kim, Mrs. McBath, Mr. Fitzpatrick, …

Jun 4, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Jun 4, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Nonprofits
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Animal shelters, Recipient nonprofits

Positive-direction: Animal shelters

Negative-direction: Recipient nonprofits

Pet Products
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Pet food donors

Consumers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Low-income pet owners

Disability
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Service animal handlers

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

State governments

Retail
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Pet-product retailers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Animal Welfare Nonprofits Liability

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology