To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate the Hazardous Substance Superfund financing rate.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate the Hazardous Substance Superfund financing rate., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users. The main policy domain is Environment, Foreign Policy.
Who Benefits and How
environmental regulators and natural-resource users may benefit from new authority, funding, eligibility, regulatory clarity, or reduced risk created by the bill.
Who Bears the Burden and How
federal implementing agencies, environmental regulators and natural-resource users may take on implementation duties, reporting obligations, compliance costs, or oversight responsibilities.
Key Provisions
- Section H3DFBBD5F94734A11AD80016A0BAB7627: 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Pay Less at the Pump Act.
- Section HE6EB578AC54148E6B084517D1119503C: 2. Termination of Hazardous Substance Superfund financing rate Section 4611 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended by section 13601 of Public Law...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
This bill, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate the Hazardous Substance Superfund financing rate., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users.
Key Policy Areas
Environment, Foreign Policy
Primary Purpose
This bill, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate the Hazardous Substance Superfund financing rate., changes federal law or congressional policy affecting environmental regulators and natural-resource users.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- environmental regulators and natural-resource users
Identified Costs
- federal implementing agencies
- environmental regulators and natural-resource users
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Carey (for himself, Mr. Hern, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "federal_implementing_agencies"
- → Federal agencies assigned duties by the bill
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology