HR3632-119

Passed House

Power Plant Reliability Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced May 29, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Power Plant Reliability Act of 2025 expands FERC authority over electric generating units. Upon a complaint by a state commission or transmission organization, and after notice to affected state commissions and public utilities plus a hearing opportunity within 90 days, FERC may find that interstate service is inadequate or insufficient or likely to become so within five years. FERC must then determine adequate service and may issue an order, rule, or regulation requiring continued operation of an electric generating unit. It may require affected state commissions, transmission organizations, or public utilities to develop and implement long-term plans for needed interstate transmission facilities. FERC must determine compensation for additional costs, including compensation to owners or operators required to keep a unit operating, and allocate those costs. Orders can last up to five years and can be extended through a request, notice, hearing, and 60-day decision process. Actions or omissions necessary to comply with a FERC order are not treated as violations of federal, state, or local environmental law and cannot trigger civil or criminal liability or citizen suits. Owners must provide FERC, affected state commissions, and transmission organizations at least five years' notice before planned retirement of covered generating units, with an exception for unplanned catastrophes, emergencies, disasters, or similar events.

Who Benefits and How

Coal plant operators, natural gas plant operators, nuclear plant operators, power plant owners receiving compensation, regional transmission organizations, state utility commissions, grid reliability planners, industrial electricity customers, and consumers concerned about generation shortages benefit because the bill creates a federal mechanism to keep plants online, pay continued-operation costs, plan related transmission, and prevent retirements that FERC finds would undermine adequate interstate service.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff, power plant owners seeking retirement, renewable-energy developers, battery-storage developers, environmental regulators, Environmental Protection Agency enforcement staff, state environmental agencies, local environmental agencies, communities near power plants seeking emission reductions, and ratepayers bear burdens because the bill imposes five-year retirement notices, hearing and extension processes, cost allocation, continued operation orders, reduced environmental-law enforcement exposure during compliance, and possible charges to pay plants that stay open.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes FERC to find interstate electric service inadequate or likely to become inadequate within five years after a complaint and hearing opportunity.
  • Allows FERC to require continued operation of electric generating units and long-term transmission planning.
  • Requires FERC to set compensation and cost allocation for additional service and continued operation.
  • Allows orders of up to five years with extension requests and hearings.
  • Shields necessary compliance actions from federal, state, or local environmental-law violations, liability, and citizen suits.
  • Requires five years' notice before planned retirement of covered electric generating units.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Rewrites Federal Power Act section 207 to let FERC order continued operation of electric generating units when interstate electric service is or may become inadequate within five years, require long-term transmission planning, set compensation and cost allocation, require five years' planned-retirement notice, and shield compliance actions from environmental-law liability.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Electric Reliability, Environmental Regulation

Primary Purpose

Rewrites Federal Power Act section 207 to let FERC order continued operation of electric generating units when interstate electric service is or may become inadequate within five years, require long-term transmission planning, set compensation and cost allocation, require five years' planned-retirement notice, and shield compliance actions from environmental-law liability.

Policy Domains

Energy Electric Reliability Environmental Regulation

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Coal plant operators
  • Natural gas plant operators
  • Nuclear plant operators
  • Power plant owners receiving compensation
  • Regional transmission organizations
  • State utility commissions
  • Grid reliability planners
  • Industrial electricity customers
  • Consumers concerned about generation shortages
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Coal plant operators: ,
Nuclear plant operators: ,
Grid reliability planners: ,
State utility commissions: ,
Natural gas plant operators: ,
Industrial electricity customers: ,
Regional transmission organizations: ,
Power plant owners receiving compensation: ,
Consumers concerned about generation shortages: ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff
  • Power plant owners seeking retirement
  • Renewable-energy developers
  • Battery-storage developers
  • Environmental regulators
  • Environmental Protection Agency enforcement staff
  • State environmental agencies
  • Local environmental agencies
  • Communities near power plants seeking emission reductions
  • Ratepayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Ratepayers: ,
Environmental regulators: ,
Battery-storage developers: ,
Renewable-energy developers: ,
Local environmental agencies: ,
State environmental agencies: ,
Power plant owners seeking retirement: ,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff: ,
Environmental Protection Agency enforcement staff: ,
Communities near power plants seeking emission reductions: ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 17, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy …

Dec 17, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Dec 17, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Dec 16, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Dec 16, 2025

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 222 - …

Dec 16, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …

Dec 16, 2025

On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: …

Dec 16, 2025

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5934-5935)

Dec 16, 2025

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate H.R. 3632, …

Dec 16, 2025

The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Utilities
15 mentions across 4 clauses
+10 positive -4 negative ?1 uncertain

Coal plant operators, Natural gas plant operators, Nuclear plant operators

Positive-direction: Coal plant operators, Natural gas plant operators, Nuclear plant operators, Power plant owners receiving compensation

Negative-direction: Power plant owners seeking retirement, Public utilities affected by FERC orders

Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative ?3 uncertain

Environmental Protection Agency enforcement staff, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff

General Public
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative ?3 uncertain

Communities near power plants seeking emission reductions, Ratepayers

State & Local Government
5 mentions across 4 clauses
?5 uncertain

Local environmental agencies, State environmental agencies, State utility commissions

Renewable Energy
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Renewable-energy developers

1/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown
House Roll #342

On Passage

Power Plant Reliability Act

Passed
222 Yea 202 Nay 9 Not Voting
Dec 16, 2025
House Roll #341

On Motion to Recommit

Power Plant Reliability Act

Failed
207 Yea 218 Nay 8 Not Voting
Dec 16, 2025

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Electric Reliability Environmental Regulation
Actor Mappings
"commission"
→ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
"electric_generating_unit"
→ covered electric energy producing unit that is a component of a generating facility

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology