HR3629-119

In Committee

End Banking for Human Traffickers Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced May 29, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The End Banking for Human Traffickers Act uses financial regulation to target trafficking proceeds. Within 180 days, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, consulting Treasury, the private sector, trafficking victims, at-risk advocates, and law enforcement, must review and enhance training and examination procedures so anti-money-laundering and countering-the-financing-of-terrorism programs can better detect transactions tied to severe trafficking, improve procedures for referrals to law enforcement, and decide whether financial institution requirements are sufficient. Within 270 days, the Interagency Task Force To Monitor and Combat Trafficking must report to financial-services, judiciary, banking, and judiciary committees, plus federal banking agency heads, on U.S. government and financial institution AML efforts against severe trafficking. Recommendations must include bank feedback on successful programs, victim and advocate input, changes to internal policies, procedures, controls, training, information sharing among banks and law enforcement, and possible statutory updates for emerging technologies and virtual currencies. The bill does not give the task force rulemaking power and says it should not encourage banks to deny services to trafficking victims or people not responsible for trafficking. It also amends the minimum standards for eliminating trafficking to consider whether foreign governments have frameworks to prevent financial transactions involving trafficking proceeds and are investigating, prosecuting, convicting, and sentencing people who conduct those transactions.

Who Benefits and How

Trafficking victims benefit if banks and regulators identify trafficker money flows without denying services to victims. Law enforcement agencies benefit from improved referral procedures and better financial intelligence on severe trafficking. Financial institutions benefit from clearer regulator guidance, training expectations, and best-practice sharing. Anti-trafficking advocates benefit because the bill requires consultation with victims and at-risk communities.

Who Bears the Burden and How

FFIEC examiners must review and enhance training, examination, and referral procedures within 180 days. The Interagency Task Force To Monitor and Combat Trafficking must produce a detailed report and recommendations within 270 days. Financial institutions may need to update AML controls, employee training, information sharing, and virtual-currency monitoring. Foreign governments may face greater scrutiny in trafficking rankings if they lack financial-transaction frameworks.

Key Provisions

  • Requires FFIEC review of AML and CFT procedures for detecting severe trafficking transactions.
  • Requires improved procedures for referring possible trafficking-related financial cases to law enforcement.
  • Requires task-force recommendations on bank policies, training, information sharing, emerging technology, and virtual currency.
  • Preserves services for trafficking victims and people not responsible for trafficking.
  • Adds anti-trafficking financial frameworks to minimum standards for eliminating trafficking.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires banking regulators and the anti-trafficking task force to strengthen anti-money-laundering detection of human-trafficking proceeds, improve training and referral procedures, consult victims, advocates, law enforcement, and the private sector, report recommendations within 270 days, and add countries' anti-trafficking financial frameworks to minimum standards for eliminating trafficking.

Key Policy Areas

Banking, Human Trafficking, Anti-Money Laundering

Primary Purpose

Requires banking regulators and the anti-trafficking task force to strengthen anti-money-laundering detection of human-trafficking proceeds, improve training and referral procedures, consult victims, advocates, law enforcement, and the private sector, report recommendations within 270 days, and add countries' anti-trafficking financial frameworks to minimum standards for eliminating trafficking.

Policy Domains

Banking Human Trafficking Anti-Money Laundering

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Trafficking victims
  • Law enforcement agencies
  • Financial institutions
  • Anti-trafficking advocates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Trafficking victims: ,
Financial institutions: ,
Law enforcement agencies: ,
Anti-trafficking advocates: ,
Identified Costs
  • FFIEC examiners
  • Anti-trafficking task force staff
  • Financial institutions
  • Foreign governments
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FFIEC examiners: ,
Foreign governments: ,
Financial institutions: ,
Anti-trafficking task force staff: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
May 29, 2025

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Keating) introduced the following …

May 29, 2025

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition …

May 29, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Civil Liberties
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive

Anti-trafficking advocates, Trafficking victims

Financial Services
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-4 negative

FFIEC examiners, Financial institutions

Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-4 negative

Anti-trafficking task force staff, Foreign governments

Law Enforcement
2 mentions across 2 clauses
?2 uncertain

Law enforcement agencies

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Banking Human Trafficking Anti-Money Laundering

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology