Reliable Power Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
H.R.3616, the Reliable Power Act, would expand Federal Power Act section 215. The Electric Reliability Organization, currently the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), would have to include an annual long-term assessment in its reliability reviews. It would examine generation mix, transmission development, demand trends, regional supply-shortfall risks in normal and extreme weather, and whether additional generation is needed. NERC could collect information from bulk-power-system users, owners and operators. This builds on existing periodic-assessment duties, rather than creating the first grid-reliability assessment.
If NERC found inadequate-generation risk, it would publicly notify the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). FERC would promptly notify the Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency and any other agency it determines appropriate. Notified agencies would then submit covered pending regulations to FERC for review. A covered regulation must relate to or directly affect a bulk-power generation resource and already be under development or rulemaking consideration when the agency receives notice. This is not a blanket review of every later agency action, existing final rule, state rule or individual permit. The bill's federal-agency definition is limited to Executive departments and other Executive agencies in the President's cabinet.
An agency could not finalize a covered regulation until it both responded in writing to FERC's comments and obtained FERC's finding that the regulation is unlikely to have a significant negative effect on adequate bulk-power supply. The agency can explain why it declined a recommended modification, but that explanation does not replace the required FERC finding. The bill is still a proposal: the latest official action checked September 22, 2026 was Senate Energy and Natural Resources referral on December 18, 2025.
Who Benefits and How
Operators of generation resources affected by a covered pending rule could benefit if FERC review delays the rule or produces modifications that reduce compliance requirements threatening resource adequacy. The text is technology-neutral: it does not expressly reserve protection for coal, gas, nuclear or renewable generation. FERC gains an additional decision-making role, and NERC and transmission organizations retain specified consultation roles.
Electricity customers could benefit if this process actually prevents supply shortfalls. That is an intended, conditional reliability outcome, not a guaranteed reduction in outages or rates. The bill neither orders construction of new plants nor directly awards subsidies, contracts or guaranteed generator revenue.
Who Bears the Burden and How
FERC would assess covered rules, issue comments by order, consider rate and service effects if it chooses, and make the required reliability finding. DOE, EPA and other covered notified agencies would face an additional procedural and finalization constraint. NERC would perform specified annual assessments and public notifications. The statute authorizes data collection but does not itself establish a recurring form or explicit universal filing deadline for every grid operator.
If a blocked regulation would otherwise reduce pollution or another harm, delayed implementation could postpone those protections for affected communities. The bill does not quantify that tradeoff or ensure that every affected regulation has such effects. It states no new appropriation, review-completion deadline, automatic approval if FERC is silent, express emergency bypass, or express termination procedure for a generation-inadequacy notice. Those omissions can make regulatory timing uncertain.
Key Provisions
- Requires annual long-term adequacy assessments covering resource mix, transmission, demand, regional shortfall risks and additional generation needs.
- Requires public NERC notice to FERC when generation inadequacy is found, followed by prompt FERC notice to DOE, EPA and other appropriate agencies.
- Requires covered rules to be submitted when first sent for interagency review, or at least 90 days before publication or public availability when no such review occurs.
- Prohibits finalizing a covered rule without both a written agency response and FERC's favorable reliability finding.
- Requires publication of FERC comments, recommendations and agency responses with the covered action.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Require annual generation-adequacy assessments and prevent specified pending federal power-generation regulations from being finalized after an inadequacy notice without a favorable FERC reliability finding.
Key Policy Areas
Electric Power, Energy Regulation, Grid Reliability, Environmental Regulation
Primary Purpose
Require annual generation-adequacy assessments and prevent specified pending federal power-generation regulations from being finalized after an inadequacy notice without a favorable FERC reliability finding.
Policy Domains
Reliable Power Act
Identified Gains
- Electric power providers affected by covered pending federal regulations
- Electricity consumers if supply shortfalls are prevented
Identified Costs
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Department of Energy
- Environmental Protection Agency
- North American Electric Reliability Corporation
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseReceived; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy …
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 225 - …
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6006)
At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 3616, the Chair …
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate …
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4776, H.R. 1366, H.R. …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission faces effects in multiple directions
Electric generation operators affected by covered pending federal regulations
On Passage
Reliable Power Act
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "ero"
- → North American Electric Reliability Corporation, the FERC-certified Electric Reliability Organization
- "commission"
- → Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- "agency_head"
- → Head of a notified Executive department or other cabinet Executive agency
- "transmission_organizations"
- → Transmission organizations consulted by FERC; distinct from regional reliability entities
Note: IH requires FERC consultation with ERO, regional entities and transmission organizations; RH removes regional entities from that express list while retaining ERO and transmission organizations. Other changes specify electric energy in two phrases. RH/EH/RFS canonical text agrees; later diff events are parser formatting.
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
A regulation relating to or directly affecting a bulk-power-system generation resource that is under development to be proposed or otherwise under rulemaking consideration before finalization when the agency receives the inadequacy notice.
An Executive department under5USC101 or another Executive agency in the President's cabinet.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology