Reliable Power Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Reliable Power Act amends section 215 of the Federal Power Act. The electric reliability organization must include an annual long-term assessment of whether the bulk-power system has enough generation resources to maintain reliability, including analysis of resource mix, transmission development, electricity demand trends, normal-weather and extreme-weather shortfall risk, and whether additional generation resources are needed. If the ERO finds the bulk-power system is at risk of generation inadequacy, it must publicly notify FERC. FERC then must notify the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and any other appropriate cabinet agency. Once notified, covered agencies must send covered rules that directly affect bulk-power generation resources to FERC for review and comment before finalization. FERC, consulting with the ERO and transmission organizations, may recommend modifications to avoid significant negative reliability impacts. The agency head must respond in writing and may not finalize the rule until FERC finds it is unlikely to significantly harm the bulk-power system's ability to supply adequate electric energy.
Who Benefits and How
Electric utilities, merchant power generators, coal-fired power plant owners, natural gas power plant owners, nuclear plant owners, regional transmission organizations, grid reliability planners, state utility regulators, large industrial electricity customers, and consumers worried about blackouts benefit because the bill creates a formal reliability finding, requires FERC review of generation-affecting rules, and can delay or modify federal regulations that FERC finds would significantly harm electric supply adequacy.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The electric reliability organization, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff, Environmental Protection Agency rule writers, Department of Energy officials, other cabinet agencies issuing generation-related rules, Office of Management and Budget reviewers, renewable-energy developers, environmental organizations, decarbonization policy offices, and agency heads bear burdens because the bill requires annual assessments, public generation-inadequacy notices, extra interagency review, written responses to FERC comments, publication of comments and responses, and a reliability finding before covered rules can be finalized.
Key Provisions
- Requires annual long-term assessments of bulk-power-system generation adequacy.
- Requires the ERO to publicly notify FERC when the bulk-power system is at risk of generation inadequacy.
- Requires FERC to notify DOE, EPA, and other appropriate cabinet agencies after an inadequacy notice.
- Requires covered agency actions affecting generation resources to be submitted to FERC for review and comment.
- Bars finalization until the agency responds to FERC and FERC finds the action is unlikely to significantly harm reliability.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires annual generation-adequacy assessments by the electric reliability organization and creates a FERC review checkpoint for covered federal agency rules affecting bulk-power generation resources when the grid is in a state of generation inadequacy.
Key Policy Areas
Energy, Electric Reliability, Federal Regulation
Primary Purpose
Requires annual generation-adequacy assessments by the electric reliability organization and creates a FERC review checkpoint for covered federal agency rules affecting bulk-power generation resources when the grid is in a state of generation inadequacy.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Electric utilities
- Merchant power generators
- Coal-fired power plant owners
- Natural gas power plant owners
- Nuclear plant owners
- Regional transmission organizations
- Grid reliability planners
- State utility regulators
- Large industrial electricity customers
- Consumers worried about blackouts
Identified Costs
- Electric reliability organization
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff
- Environmental Protection Agency rule writers
- Department of Energy officials
- Cabinet agencies issuing generation-related rules
- Office of Management and Budget reviewers
- Renewable-energy developers
- Environmental organizations
- Decarbonization policy offices
- Agency heads
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseReceived; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy …
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6006)
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 225 - …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 3616, the Chair …
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4776, H.R. 1366, H.R. …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Coal-fired power plant owners, Electric reliability organization, Natural gas power plant owners
Positive-direction: Coal-fired power plant owners, Natural gas power plant owners, Nuclear plant owners
Negative-direction: Electric reliability organization
Department of Energy officials, Environmental Protection Agency rule writers, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
On Passage
Reliable Power Act
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "ero"
- → electric reliability organization
- "commission"
- → Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology