HR3512-119

In Committee

Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act

119th Congress Introduced May 20, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act adds a new subtitle D chapter to the Internal Revenue Code for litigation financing. A covered party must pay tax each taxable year equal to the applicable percentage of qualified litigation proceeds it receives. The applicable percentage is the highest section 1 individual tax rate plus 3.8 percentage points. If the covered party is a partnership, S corporation, or other pass-through entity, the tax is imposed at the entity level. A covered party is a third party to a civil action, including an individual, corporation, partnership, or sovereign wealth fund, that receives funds under a litigation financing agreement and is not an attorney representing a party. Litigation financing agreements are written agreements funding a named party or affiliated law firm in exchange for an interest in settlement, verdict, judgment, or other proceeds. Persons with control, receipt, or custody of proceeds from a civil action who entered a litigation financing agreement must deduct and withhold tax equal to 50 percent of the applicable percentage of payments required to be made to the third-party funder. The bill also creates section 139J excluding qualified litigation proceeds from gross income.

Who Benefits and How

Federal taxpayers benefit from a new tax stream on third-party litigation funding proceeds. Civil defendants may benefit if higher taxes reduce the expected return from financing lawsuits. Internal Revenue Service enforcement staff gain explicit statutory hooks for taxing and withholding litigation-finance proceeds. Civil defendants and business defendants may benefit if higher taxes reduce the expected return from financing lawsuits.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Third-party investment funds that finance litigation face a new tax at the top individual rate plus 3.8 percentage points on qualified proceeds. Sovereign wealth funds financing U.S. litigation are included as covered parties regardless of place of organization. Trial law firms with control of proceeds must withhold and remit tax on payments to funders. Pass-through litigation funders face entity-level taxation rather than owner-level only treatment.

Key Provisions

  • Imposes a tax on covered third-party litigation funders receiving qualified litigation proceeds.
  • Sets the tax rate at the highest individual rate plus 3.8 percentage points.
  • Applies the tax at the entity level for partnerships, S corporations, and other pass-through entities.
  • Requires withholding from civil-action proceeds paid to litigation funders.
  • Covers foreign and domestic third-party funders, including sovereign wealth funds.
  • Creates section 139J excluding qualified litigation proceeds from gross income.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a new Internal Revenue Code chapter taxing third-party litigation funders on qualified litigation proceeds at the top individual tax rate plus 3.8 percentage points, applies the tax at the entity level for pass-through funders, requires withholding from civil-action proceeds, and excludes qualified litigation proceeds from gross income under a new section 139J.

Key Policy Areas

Tax, Civil Litigation, Financial Services

Primary Purpose

Creates a new Internal Revenue Code chapter taxing third-party litigation funders on qualified litigation proceeds at the top individual tax rate plus 3.8 percentage points, applies the tax at the entity level for pass-through funders, requires withholding from civil-action proceeds, and excludes qualified litigation proceeds from gross income under a new section 139J.

Policy Domains

Tax Civil Litigation Financial Services

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Civil defendants
  • Internal Revenue Service enforcement staff
  • Business defendants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Civil defendants: ,
Federal taxpayers: ,
Business defendants: ,
Internal Revenue Service enforcement staff: ,
Identified Costs
  • Third-party investment funds
  • Sovereign wealth funds
  • Trial law firms
  • Pass-through litigation funders
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Trial law firms: ,
Sovereign wealth funds: ,
Third-party investment funds: ,
Pass-through litigation funders: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
May 20, 2025

Mr. Hern of Oklahoma (for himself and Mr. Feenstra) introduced …

May 20, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

May 20, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Financial Services
15 mentions across 5 clauses
-15 negative

Pass-through litigation funders, Sovereign wealth funds, Third-party investment funds

Professional Services
10 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive -5 negative

Civil defendants, Law firms holding proceeds

Positive-direction: Civil defendants

Negative-direction: Law firms holding proceeds

Taxpayers
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Taxpayers

Government
5 mentions across 5 clauses
-5 negative

IRS enforcement staff

6/6
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Tax Civil Litigation Financial Services

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology