Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act adds a new subtitle D chapter to the Internal Revenue Code for litigation financing. A covered party must pay tax each taxable year equal to the applicable percentage of qualified litigation proceeds it receives. The applicable percentage is the highest section 1 individual tax rate plus 3.8 percentage points. If the covered party is a partnership, S corporation, or other pass-through entity, the tax is imposed at the entity level. A covered party is a third party to a civil action, including an individual, corporation, partnership, or sovereign wealth fund, that receives funds under a litigation financing agreement and is not an attorney representing a party. Litigation financing agreements are written agreements funding a named party or affiliated law firm in exchange for an interest in settlement, verdict, judgment, or other proceeds. Persons with control, receipt, or custody of proceeds from a civil action who entered a litigation financing agreement must deduct and withhold tax equal to 50 percent of the applicable percentage of payments required to be made to the third-party funder. The bill also creates section 139J excluding qualified litigation proceeds from gross income.
Who Benefits and How
Federal taxpayers benefit from a new tax stream on third-party litigation funding proceeds. Civil defendants may benefit if higher taxes reduce the expected return from financing lawsuits. Internal Revenue Service enforcement staff gain explicit statutory hooks for taxing and withholding litigation-finance proceeds. Civil defendants and business defendants may benefit if higher taxes reduce the expected return from financing lawsuits.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Third-party investment funds that finance litigation face a new tax at the top individual rate plus 3.8 percentage points on qualified proceeds. Sovereign wealth funds financing U.S. litigation are included as covered parties regardless of place of organization. Trial law firms with control of proceeds must withhold and remit tax on payments to funders. Pass-through litigation funders face entity-level taxation rather than owner-level only treatment.
Key Provisions
- Imposes a tax on covered third-party litigation funders receiving qualified litigation proceeds.
- Sets the tax rate at the highest individual rate plus 3.8 percentage points.
- Applies the tax at the entity level for partnerships, S corporations, and other pass-through entities.
- Requires withholding from civil-action proceeds paid to litigation funders.
- Covers foreign and domestic third-party funders, including sovereign wealth funds.
- Creates section 139J excluding qualified litigation proceeds from gross income.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates a new Internal Revenue Code chapter taxing third-party litigation funders on qualified litigation proceeds at the top individual tax rate plus 3.8 percentage points, applies the tax at the entity level for pass-through funders, requires withholding from civil-action proceeds, and excludes qualified litigation proceeds from gross income under a new section 139J.
Key Policy Areas
Tax, Civil Litigation, Financial Services
Primary Purpose
Creates a new Internal Revenue Code chapter taxing third-party litigation funders on qualified litigation proceeds at the top individual tax rate plus 3.8 percentage points, applies the tax at the entity level for pass-through funders, requires withholding from civil-action proceeds, and excludes qualified litigation proceeds from gross income under a new section 139J.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Federal taxpayers
- Civil defendants
- Internal Revenue Service enforcement staff
- Business defendants
Identified Costs
- Third-party investment funds
- Sovereign wealth funds
- Trial law firms
- Pass-through litigation funders
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Hern of Oklahoma (for himself and Mr. Feenstra) introduced …
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Pass-through litigation funders, Sovereign wealth funds, Third-party investment funds
Civil defendants, Law firms holding proceeds
Positive-direction: Civil defendants
Negative-direction: Law firms holding proceeds
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology