HR3348-119

Reported

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act with respect to the definition of accredited investor, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced May 13, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Accredited Investor Definition Review Act changes who can qualify as an accredited investor. It amends the Securities Act definition so individuals may qualify if they hold certifications, designations, or credentials that the Securities and Exchange Commission determines show financial sophistication. The list must include the professional certifications identified in the SEC's 2020 accredited-investor order, and the attributes the SEC considers must be at least as broad as the 2020 final rule. The bill also amends Dodd-Frank's periodic-review provision: within 18 months and every five years after that, the SEC must review the Rule 501(a)(10) credential list, add substantially similar certifications that measure financial sophistication, knowledge, or experience, and adjust the list when needed for public interest, investor protection, and economic conditions.

Who Benefits and How

Licensed financial professionals benefit because recognized credentials can qualify them for accredited-investor status even if they do not satisfy wealth or income thresholds. Professional certification bodies benefit because SEC recognition can increase the value of their credentials. Private fund managers benefit from a larger pool of eligible accredited investors. Startup private issuers benefit because more credentialed investors may be allowed to participate in private offerings. The Securities and Exchange Commission benefits from an explicit periodic-review framework rather than ad hoc credential-list updates.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Securities and Exchange Commission must review certifications within 18 months, repeat the review every five years, evaluate whether credentials measure sophistication, and adjust the list as conditions change. SEC investor-protection staff must weigh public-interest and investor-protection risks when adding credentials. Retail investors without SEC-recognized credentials may remain excluded from private offerings even if the credential path expands access for others. Broker-dealers and private-offering compliance staff must update accredited-investor verification procedures. Investor advocacy organizations may bear a policy burden if broader credential access increases exposure to private-market risks.

Key Provisions

  • Amends the Securities Act accredited-investor definition to include SEC-recognized certifications, designations, and credentials.
  • Requires the SEC list to include professional certifications from the 2020 accredited-investor order.
  • Requires SEC credential attributes to be no less broad than the 2020 accredited-investor final rule.
  • Directs the SEC to review Rule 501(a)(10) credentials within 18 months and every five years.
  • Requires the SEC to add substantially similar credentials and adjust the list for public interest, investor protection, and economic conditions.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Expands the Securities Act accredited-investor definition to include individuals with SEC-recognized certifications, designations, or credentials, locks in the 2020 SEC certification list as a floor, and requires the SEC to review and update that credential list within 18 months and every five years.

Key Policy Areas

Securities, Capital Markets, Financial Regulation

Primary Purpose

Expands the Securities Act accredited-investor definition to include individuals with SEC-recognized certifications, designations, or credentials, locks in the 2020 SEC certification list as a floor, and requires the SEC to review and update that credential list within 18 months and every five years.

Policy Domains

Securities Capital Markets Financial Regulation

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Licensed financial professionals
  • Professional certification bodies
  • Private fund managers
  • Startup private issuers
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Private fund managers: , , ,
Startup private issuers: , , ,
Licensed financial professionals: , , ,
Professional certification bodies: , , ,
Securities and Exchange Commission: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • SEC investor-protection staff
  • Retail investors without SEC-recognized credentials
  • Broker-dealer compliance staff
  • Private-offering compliance staff
  • Investor advocacy organizations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
SEC investor-protection staff: , , ,
Broker-dealer compliance staff: , , ,
Investor advocacy organizations: , , ,
Private-offering compliance staff: , , ,
Retail investors without SEC-recognized credentials: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 4, 2025

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

May 13, 2025

Mr. Huizenga introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Financial Services
15 mentions across 6 clauses
+15 positive

Licensed financial professionals, Private fund managers, Professional certification bodies

Government
9 mentions across 6 clauses
+3 positive -6 negative

SEC investor-protection staff, Securities and Exchange Commission

Securities and Exchange Commission faces effects in multiple directions

Capital Markets
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Startup private issuers

Consumers
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Investor advocacy organizations

3/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Securities Capital Markets Financial Regulation
Actor Mappings
"sec"
→ Securities and Exchange Commission

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology