HR3271-118

Introduced

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exclude child and dependent care services and payments from the rate used to compute overtime compensation.

118th Congress Introduced May 11, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates exclusion of child care in computing overtime compensation Section 7(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, grants, compliance mandates, and product standards. The main policy areas are Business and Finance.

Who Benefits and How

Businesses and employers affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities and Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Creates exclusion of child care in computing overtime compensation Section 7(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill creates exclusion of child care in computing overtime compensation Section 7(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C.

Key Policy Areas

Business, Finance

Primary Purpose

The bill creates exclusion of child care in computing overtime compensation Section 7(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C.

Policy Domains

Business Finance

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Businesses and employers affected by the bill
  • Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Businesses and employers affected by the bill:
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause:
Identified Costs
  • Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause:

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
May 11, 2023

Ms. Stefanik (for herself, Mr. Harder of California, and Mrs. …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Business Finance

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology