HR3188-119

In Committee

Migratory Bird Protection Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced May 5, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Migratory Bird Protection Act amends the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to make unauthorized incidental take of migratory birds, parts, nests, or eggs a violation unless authorized by the Secretary of the Interior acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Interior must promulgate regulations, including general permits, and must continue enforcing Director's Order No. 225 until industry-specific regulations are issued. A person who incidentally takes migratory birds without authorization or violates permit or regulatory terms may face civil penalties up to 10,000 dollars per violation, while reckless or grossly negligent unpermitted take remains subject to criminal penalties. Interior may seek injunctive relief, must provide notice and hearing before penalties, consider gravity and good faith, and may remit or mitigate penalties in extraordinary cases. The Secretary may collect fees for permit administration and bird conservation, deposit fees, penalties, appropriations, and donations into a Migratory Bird Recovery Fund, and use funds for affected species and birds of conservation concern. The bill authorizes 10 million dollars per fiscal year, requires five-year reports to House Natural Resources and Senate Environment and Public Works leaders, and establishes a research program with research institutions, universities, wildlife conservation groups, and regulated activity representatives to monitor bird populations, identify stressors, reduce impacts, and validate mitigation.

Who Benefits and How

Migratory bird populations benefit because unauthorized incidental take becomes enforceable and permit fees support conservation. Wildlife conservation groups benefit from a stronger legal standard, recovery fund, and research program. Research institutions and universities benefit from consultation and possible agreements to monitor bird populations and test mitigation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff benefit from explicit regulatory authority and fee-supported permit administration.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Energy developers, construction contractors, and other regulated activity operators must obtain permits or comply with general regulations to avoid incidental take liability. Industry permit applicants may pay fees and implement mitigation measures for affected bird species. Interior enforcement staff must issue regulations, administer penalties, manage hearings, and pursue injunctions when needed. Federal appropriators bear the 10 million dollar annual authorization.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits unauthorized incidental take of migratory birds, parts, nests, and eggs.
  • Requires Interior and Fish and Wildlife Service regulations, including general permits, for incidental take.
  • Authorizes civil penalties up to 10,000 dollars per violation and injunctive relief.
  • Creates the Migratory Bird Recovery Fund for fees, penalties, appropriations, donations, administration, and conservation.
  • Authorizes 10 million dollars per year, five-year reports, and a research program on bird populations, stressors, and mitigation.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Restores Migratory Bird Treaty Act liability for unauthorized incidental take, directs Interior and Fish and Wildlife Service regulations and general permits, creates civil penalties, fees, a Migratory Bird Recovery Fund, 10 million dollars per year in appropriations, five-year reporting, and a research program.

Key Policy Areas

Wildlife, Environmental Protection, Permitting

Primary Purpose

Restores Migratory Bird Treaty Act liability for unauthorized incidental take, directs Interior and Fish and Wildlife Service regulations and general permits, creates civil penalties, fees, a Migratory Bird Recovery Fund, 10 million dollars per year in appropriations, five-year reporting, and a research program.

Policy Domains

Wildlife Environmental Protection Permitting

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Migratory bird populations
  • Wildlife conservation groups
  • University researchers
  • Fish and Wildlife Service staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
University researchers: ,
Migratory bird populations: ,
Wildlife conservation groups: ,
Fish and Wildlife Service staff: ,
Identified Costs
  • Energy developers
  • Construction contractors
  • Industry permit applicants
  • Interior enforcement staff
  • Federal appropriators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Energy developers: ,
Federal appropriators: ,
Construction contractors: ,
Industry permit applicants: ,
Interior enforcement staff: ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
May 5, 2025

Mr. Huffman (for himself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following …

May 5, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

May 5, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative ?2 uncertain

Fish and Wildlife Service staff, Interior enforcement staff

Wildlife
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Migratory bird populations

Environment
2 mentions across 2 clauses
?2 uncertain

Wildlife conservation groups

Education
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

University researchers

Energy
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Energy developers

Construction
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Construction contractors

Permitting
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Industry permit applicants

Federal Budget
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Federal appropriators

2/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Wildlife Environmental Protection Permitting

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology