Migratory Bird Protection Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Migratory Bird Protection Act amends the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to make unauthorized incidental take of migratory birds, parts, nests, or eggs a violation unless authorized by the Secretary of the Interior acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Interior must promulgate regulations, including general permits, and must continue enforcing Director's Order No. 225 until industry-specific regulations are issued. A person who incidentally takes migratory birds without authorization or violates permit or regulatory terms may face civil penalties up to 10,000 dollars per violation, while reckless or grossly negligent unpermitted take remains subject to criminal penalties. Interior may seek injunctive relief, must provide notice and hearing before penalties, consider gravity and good faith, and may remit or mitigate penalties in extraordinary cases. The Secretary may collect fees for permit administration and bird conservation, deposit fees, penalties, appropriations, and donations into a Migratory Bird Recovery Fund, and use funds for affected species and birds of conservation concern. The bill authorizes 10 million dollars per fiscal year, requires five-year reports to House Natural Resources and Senate Environment and Public Works leaders, and establishes a research program with research institutions, universities, wildlife conservation groups, and regulated activity representatives to monitor bird populations, identify stressors, reduce impacts, and validate mitigation.
Who Benefits and How
Migratory bird populations benefit because unauthorized incidental take becomes enforceable and permit fees support conservation. Wildlife conservation groups benefit from a stronger legal standard, recovery fund, and research program. Research institutions and universities benefit from consultation and possible agreements to monitor bird populations and test mitigation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff benefit from explicit regulatory authority and fee-supported permit administration.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Energy developers, construction contractors, and other regulated activity operators must obtain permits or comply with general regulations to avoid incidental take liability. Industry permit applicants may pay fees and implement mitigation measures for affected bird species. Interior enforcement staff must issue regulations, administer penalties, manage hearings, and pursue injunctions when needed. Federal appropriators bear the 10 million dollar annual authorization.
Key Provisions
- Prohibits unauthorized incidental take of migratory birds, parts, nests, and eggs.
- Requires Interior and Fish and Wildlife Service regulations, including general permits, for incidental take.
- Authorizes civil penalties up to 10,000 dollars per violation and injunctive relief.
- Creates the Migratory Bird Recovery Fund for fees, penalties, appropriations, donations, administration, and conservation.
- Authorizes 10 million dollars per year, five-year reports, and a research program on bird populations, stressors, and mitigation.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Restores Migratory Bird Treaty Act liability for unauthorized incidental take, directs Interior and Fish and Wildlife Service regulations and general permits, creates civil penalties, fees, a Migratory Bird Recovery Fund, 10 million dollars per year in appropriations, five-year reporting, and a research program.
Key Policy Areas
Wildlife, Environmental Protection, Permitting
Primary Purpose
Restores Migratory Bird Treaty Act liability for unauthorized incidental take, directs Interior and Fish and Wildlife Service regulations and general permits, creates civil penalties, fees, a Migratory Bird Recovery Fund, 10 million dollars per year in appropriations, five-year reporting, and a research program.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Migratory bird populations
- Wildlife conservation groups
- University researchers
- Fish and Wildlife Service staff
Identified Costs
- Energy developers
- Construction contractors
- Industry permit applicants
- Interior enforcement staff
- Federal appropriators
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Huffman (for himself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following …
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Introduced in House
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Fish and Wildlife Service staff, Interior enforcement staff
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology