To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 and the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to eliminate reduced price breakfasts and lunches and to require that the income guidelines for determining eligibility for free breakfasts and free lunches be 200 percent of the poverty level, and for other purposes.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill creates direct certification for children receiving Medicaid benefits Section 9(b) of the Richard B and creates retroactive reimbursement Section 9(b)(9)(C) of the Richard B. It relies on definition changes, grants, compliance mandates, and appropriations. The main policy areas are Education, Environment, Housing, and Healthcare.
Who Benefits and How
Educational institutions and students affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities, Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities, and Homeowners, tenants, or housing market participants affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Creates direct certification for children receiving Medicaid benefits Section 9(b) of the Richard B.
- Creates retroactive reimbursement Section 9(b)(9)(C) of the Richard B.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill creates direct certification for children receiving Medicaid benefits Section 9(b) of the Richard B and creates retroactive reimbursement Section 9(b)(9)(C) of the Richard B.
Key Policy Areas
Education, Environment, Housing, Healthcare
Primary Purpose
The bill creates direct certification for children receiving Medicaid benefits Section 9(b) of the Richard B and creates retroactive reimbursement Section 9(b)(9)(C) of the Richard B.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Educational institutions and students affected by the bill
- Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
- Homeowners, tenants, or housing market participants affected by the bill
- Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Porter (for herself, Mr. Payne, Mr. Carson, Mr. DeSaulnier, …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology