To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require a certain percentage of funds appropriated for revolving fund capitalization grants be used for green projects, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill creates capitalization grants Section 602(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, appropriations, and grants. The main policy areas are Environment and Energy.
Who Benefits and How
Water infrastructure operators and water users affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities, Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities, and Energy producers and energy supply-chain firms affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities.
Who Bears the Burden and How
No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.
Key Provisions
- Creates capitalization grants Section 602(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill creates capitalization grants Section 602(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Environment, Energy
Primary Purpose
The bill creates capitalization grants Section 602(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Water infrastructure operators and water users affected by the bill
- Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill
- Energy producers and energy supply-chain firms affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Williams of Georgia (for herself and Mrs. Sykes) introduced …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology