HR2869-119

Reported

EBSA Investigations Transparency Act

119th Congress Introduced Apr 10, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The EBSA Investigations Transparency Act adds an annual reporting requirement to ERISA. By December 31 each year after enactment, the Secretary of Labor must report to Congress on active enforcement cases, investigations, and targeted compliance monitoring under ERISA section 504. For each investigation, the report must identify the EBSA regional, district, or other office that opened it, the opening date, the first document-request date, whether the investigation concluded within 36 months after that request, why any investigation remained open after that period, and the estimated conclusion date. The report may not identify private parties such as plan sponsors, fiduciaries, service providers, employees, or participants. The bill also defines when an investigation is considered concluded and treats changed issues or topics as a continuing investigation rather than a new one.

Who Benefits and How

Congress benefits from annual, case-status visibility into EBSA investigations and long-running enforcement matters. Plan sponsors under ERISA investigations benefit from congressional oversight of delayed or prolonged investigations, even though their names are not disclosed. Retirement plan fiduciaries and retirement plan service providers benefit from greater transparency about EBSA investigation timelines and targeted compliance monitoring. Retirement plan participants may benefit indirectly if oversight encourages more timely investigations without exposing private-party identities.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Employee Benefits Security Administration must collect, organize, and report investigation data each year. Department of Labor regional offices must track opening dates, document-request dates, 36-month status, reasons for delay, expected closure dates, closing letters, and targeted compliance monitoring. The Secretary of Labor must submit the annual report while protecting private-party identities. EBSA enforcement managers face additional oversight of investigations that remain open for more than 36 months.

Key Provisions

  • Requires annual reports to Congress on ERISA enforcement cases, active investigations, and targeted compliance monitoring.
  • Requires investigation-specific information on the EBSA office, opening date, first document-request date, 36-month status, reasons for delay, and estimated conclusion date.
  • Prohibits identifying private parties such as plan sponsors, fiduciaries, service providers, employees, or participants in the report.
  • Defines when an investigation is concluded and treats changed issues during an investigation as a continuing investigation.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Amends ERISA section 504 to require the Secretary of Labor to submit annual reports to Congress on Employee Benefits Security Administration investigations and targeted compliance monitoring, including opening offices, request dates, whether investigations conclude within 36 months, reasons for delays, estimated closure dates, and privacy protections for investigated parties.

Key Policy Areas

Labor, Employee Benefits, Government Oversight

Primary Purpose

Amends ERISA section 504 to require the Secretary of Labor to submit annual reports to Congress on Employee Benefits Security Administration investigations and targeted compliance monitoring, including opening offices, request dates, whether investigations conclude within 36 months, reasons for delays, estimated closure dates, and privacy protections for investigated parties.

Policy Domains

Labor Employee Benefits Government Oversight

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Congress
  • Plan sponsors under ERISA investigations
  • Retirement plan fiduciaries
  • Retirement plan service providers
  • Retirement plan participants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Congress: ,
Retirement plan fiduciaries: ,
Retirement plan participants: ,
Retirement plan service providers: ,
Plan sponsors under ERISA investigations: ,
Identified Costs
  • Employee Benefits Security Administration
  • Department of Labor regional offices
  • Secretary of Labor
  • EBSA enforcement managers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Secretary of Labor: ,
EBSA enforcement managers: ,
Department of Labor regional offices: ,
Employee Benefits Security Administration: ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 10, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 418.

Feb 10, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. …

Feb 10, 2026

Additional sponsor: Mrs. Miller-Meeks

Feb 10, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 418.

Sep 17, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Sep 17, 2025

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

Apr 10, 2025

Introduced in House

Apr 10, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Apr 10, 2025

Mrs. McClain (for herself, Mr. Walberg, and Mr. Owens) introduced …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Labor
18 mentions across 3 clauses
+9 positive -6 negative ?3 uncertain

Department of Labor regional offices, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Plan sponsors under ERISA investigations

Positive-direction: Plan sponsors under ERISA investigations, Retirement plan fiduciaries, Retirement plan service providers

Negative-direction: Department of Labor regional offices, Employee Benefits Security Administration

Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Congress

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Labor Employee Benefits Government Oversight
Actor Mappings
"ebsa"
→ Employee Benefits Security Administration
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Labor

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology