To amend the Public Health Service Act to authorize grants to health care providers to enhance the physical and cyber security of their facilities, personnel, and patients.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill creates grants to health care providers to enhance security Part P of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C and creates 399V–8. Grants to health care providers to enhance security. It relies on grants. The main policy areas are Defense and Healthcare.
Who Benefits and How
Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities and National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities.
Who Bears the Burden and How
No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.
Key Provisions
- Creates grants to health care providers to enhance security Part P of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
- Creates 399V–8. Grants to health care providers to enhance security.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill creates grants to health care providers to enhance security Part P of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C and creates 399V–8. Grants to health care providers to enhance security.
Key Policy Areas
Defense, Healthcare
Primary Purpose
The bill creates grants to health care providers to enhance security Part P of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C and creates 399V–8. Grants to health care providers to enhance security.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
- National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Escobar (for herself, Ms. Bonamici, Ms. Castor of Florida, …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology