Save Our Sequoias Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Save Our Sequoias Act builds a dedicated federal response for giant sequoia groves threatened by high-severity wildfire, insects, and drought. It covers National Park Service lands in Kings Canyon, Sequoia, and Yosemite National Parks; Bureau of Land Management lands at Case Mountain; and National Forest System lands in Sequoia National Forest, Giant Sequoia National Monument, Sierra National Forest, and Tahoe National Forest. The bill directs shared stewardship among the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture, California, and the Tule River Tribe; codifies the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition; requires a science-based health and resiliency assessment; declares a seven-year emergency for Protection Projects; establishes reforestation strategies and strike teams; creates restoration grants; adds insect monitoring and technology partnerships; expands good-neighbor and stewardship contracting; creates a philanthropic Giant Sequoia Emergency Protection Fund; and authorizes escalating appropriations for fiscal years 2026 through 2032.
Who Benefits and How
Giant sequoia conservation projects benefit from a coordinated federal, state, tribal, and philanthropic framework aimed at fuels reduction, reforestation, rehabilitation, insect monitoring, and drought resilience. The National Park Service, Forest Service, and Bureau of Land Management benefit from explicit authorities, emergency procedures, strike teams, contracting tools, and outside foundation support for sequoia work. The Tule River Tribe and other California tribes benefit from formal roles in the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, shared stewardship, grant eligibility, tribal management support, and funding for tribal historic preservation officers. Rural communities near sequoia groves, small forestry businesses, tree nurseries, biomass producers, biochar producers, academic institutions, and nonprofit conservation organizations benefit from grant and contracting opportunities tied to hazardous-fuels removal, nursery capacity, restoration science, and job creation.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of Agriculture must negotiate shared stewardship arrangements, implement emergency Protection Projects, establish strike teams, build reforestation and insect-monitoring strategies, administer grants, approve foundation-funded projects, and allocate authorized funds. The Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition must produce assessments, prioritize projects, analyze policy barriers, and coordinate across federal, state, tribal, university, county, and foundation partners. Conservation advocacy groups and environmental review participants may lose procedural leverage because the bill gives emergency authorities and legal force to expedited NEPA, Endangered Species Act, and historic-preservation procedures for Protection Projects. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of authorized appropriations up to $10 million in fiscal year 2026, $25 million in fiscal year 2027, $30 million annually for fiscal years 2028 through 2030, and $40 million annually for fiscal years 2031 and 2032.
Key Provisions
- Defines covered public lands, covered National Forest System lands, giant sequoia groves, Protection Projects, reforestation, restoration, and the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition.
- Requires a shared stewardship agreement with California and the Tule River Tribe for short-term and long-term giant sequoia management, conservation, and restoration.
- Establishes the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition and assigns duties to produce assessments, coordinate projects, identify policy barriers, and improve public-private restoration work.
- Requires a Giant Sequoia Health and Resiliency Assessment identifying disturbed groves, high-risk groves, nearby wildfire-risk lands, reforestation needs, priority Protection Projects, and policy recommendations.
- Declares a seven-year giant sequoia emergency and allows Protection Projects to proceed under expedited environmental, historic-preservation, and endangered-species procedures.
- Directs a Giant Sequoia Reforestation and Rehabilitation Strategy addressing priority groves, barriers, nursery capacity, workforce shortages, science gaps, public-private partnerships, and genetic diversity.
- Creates Giant Sequoia Strike Teams to support reviews, site preparation, Protection Projects, and reforestation or rehabilitation work.
- Establishes collaborative restoration grants for nonprofits, tribal governments, local governments, academic institutions, private organizations, small businesses, rural job creation, biomass, biochar, nursery capacity, and tribal management.
- Expands good-neighbor and stewardship contracting tools for Kings Canyon, Sequoia, Yosemite, BLM lands, and National Park Service lands.
- Establishes a Giant Sequoia Emergency Protection Program and Fund through the National Park Foundation, National Forest Foundation, and Foundation for America's Public Lands.
- Authorizes appropriations from fiscal years 2026 through 2032 and requires at least 90 percent of authorized funds to support Protection Projects and collaborative restoration grants.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates a multi-agency giant sequoia protection framework for California public lands and national forests, including a shared stewardship agreement with California and the Tule River Tribe, codification of the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, a health and resiliency assessment, emergency hazardous-fuels and reforestation authorities, strike teams, restoration grants, insect monitoring, stewardship and good-neighbor contracting, a philanthropic emergency protection fund, and appropriations rising from $10 million in fiscal year 2026 to $40 million annually in fiscal years 2031 and 2032.
Key Policy Areas
Public Lands, Forestry, Wildfire, Tribal Affairs, Conservation
Primary Purpose
Creates a multi-agency giant sequoia protection framework for California public lands and national forests, including a shared stewardship agreement with California and the Tule River Tribe, codification of the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, a health and resiliency assessment, emergency hazardous-fuels and reforestation authorities, strike teams, restoration grants, insect monitoring, stewardship and good-neighbor contracting, a philanthropic emergency protection fund, and appropriations rising from $10 million in fiscal year 2026 to $40 million annually in fiscal years 2031 and 2032.
Policy Domains
House resolution provisions
Identified Gains
- Giant sequoia conservation projects
- National Park Service
- Forest Service
- Bureau of Land Management
- Tule River Tribe
- California tribes
- Rural communities near sequoia groves
- Small forestry businesses
- Tree nurseries
- Biomass producers
- Biochar producers
- Academic institutions studying giant sequoias
- Nonprofit conservation organizations
Identified Costs
- Secretary of the Interior
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition
- Conservation advocacy groups
- Environmental review participants
- Federal taxpayers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy …
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2503-2509)
Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the …
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 466.
Committee on Agriculture discharged.
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Forest Service, Forest Service employees, Forest management contractors
Positive-direction: Forest management contractors, Forest restoration contractors, Forestry workforce, Grant recipients under section 9, Private forestry contractors, Seedling producers, Small forestry businesses
Negative-direction: Forest Service, Secretary of Agriculture
California tribes, Tribal government conservation staff, Tribal governments
Conservation advocacy groups, Foundation for America's Public Lands, National Forest Foundation
Positive-direction: Foundation for America's Public Lands, National Forest Foundation, National Park Foundation, Nonprofit conservation organizations
Negative-direction: Conservation advocacy groups, Wilderness preservation advocates
Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior employees, Federal land management agencies
National Park Service faces effects in multiple directions
Positive-direction: Federal land management agencies
Negative-direction: Bureau of Land Management, Secretary concerned for sequoia lands, Secretary of the Interior
Environmental review participants, Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, Giant sequoia conservation projects
Positive-direction: Giant sequoia conservation projects, Protection Projects for giant sequoias
Negative-direction: Environmental review participants, Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition
County governments near sequoia parks, County of Tulare, Governor of California
Academic forest scientists, Academic institutions studying giant sequoias, University of California Berkeley
California spotted owl habitat, Pacific fisher habitat
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "blm"
- → Bureau of Land Management
- "nps"
- → National Park Service
- "tribe"
- → Tule River Tribe
- "interior"
- → Secretary of the Interior
- "coalition"
- → Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition
- "agriculture"
- → Secretary of Agriculture
- "forest_service"
- → Forest Service
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology