HR2709-119

Reported

Save Our Sequoias Act

119th Congress Introduced Apr 8, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Save Our Sequoias Act builds a dedicated federal response for giant sequoia groves threatened by high-severity wildfire, insects, and drought. It covers National Park Service lands in Kings Canyon, Sequoia, and Yosemite National Parks; Bureau of Land Management lands at Case Mountain; and National Forest System lands in Sequoia National Forest, Giant Sequoia National Monument, Sierra National Forest, and Tahoe National Forest. The bill directs shared stewardship among the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture, California, and the Tule River Tribe; codifies the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition; requires a science-based health and resiliency assessment; declares a seven-year emergency for Protection Projects; establishes reforestation strategies and strike teams; creates restoration grants; adds insect monitoring and technology partnerships; expands good-neighbor and stewardship contracting; creates a philanthropic Giant Sequoia Emergency Protection Fund; and authorizes escalating appropriations for fiscal years 2026 through 2032.

Who Benefits and How

Giant sequoia conservation projects benefit from a coordinated federal, state, tribal, and philanthropic framework aimed at fuels reduction, reforestation, rehabilitation, insect monitoring, and drought resilience. The National Park Service, Forest Service, and Bureau of Land Management benefit from explicit authorities, emergency procedures, strike teams, contracting tools, and outside foundation support for sequoia work. The Tule River Tribe and other California tribes benefit from formal roles in the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, shared stewardship, grant eligibility, tribal management support, and funding for tribal historic preservation officers. Rural communities near sequoia groves, small forestry businesses, tree nurseries, biomass producers, biochar producers, academic institutions, and nonprofit conservation organizations benefit from grant and contracting opportunities tied to hazardous-fuels removal, nursery capacity, restoration science, and job creation.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of Agriculture must negotiate shared stewardship arrangements, implement emergency Protection Projects, establish strike teams, build reforestation and insect-monitoring strategies, administer grants, approve foundation-funded projects, and allocate authorized funds. The Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition must produce assessments, prioritize projects, analyze policy barriers, and coordinate across federal, state, tribal, university, county, and foundation partners. Conservation advocacy groups and environmental review participants may lose procedural leverage because the bill gives emergency authorities and legal force to expedited NEPA, Endangered Species Act, and historic-preservation procedures for Protection Projects. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of authorized appropriations up to $10 million in fiscal year 2026, $25 million in fiscal year 2027, $30 million annually for fiscal years 2028 through 2030, and $40 million annually for fiscal years 2031 and 2032.

Key Provisions

  • Defines covered public lands, covered National Forest System lands, giant sequoia groves, Protection Projects, reforestation, restoration, and the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition.
  • Requires a shared stewardship agreement with California and the Tule River Tribe for short-term and long-term giant sequoia management, conservation, and restoration.
  • Establishes the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition and assigns duties to produce assessments, coordinate projects, identify policy barriers, and improve public-private restoration work.
  • Requires a Giant Sequoia Health and Resiliency Assessment identifying disturbed groves, high-risk groves, nearby wildfire-risk lands, reforestation needs, priority Protection Projects, and policy recommendations.
  • Declares a seven-year giant sequoia emergency and allows Protection Projects to proceed under expedited environmental, historic-preservation, and endangered-species procedures.
  • Directs a Giant Sequoia Reforestation and Rehabilitation Strategy addressing priority groves, barriers, nursery capacity, workforce shortages, science gaps, public-private partnerships, and genetic diversity.
  • Creates Giant Sequoia Strike Teams to support reviews, site preparation, Protection Projects, and reforestation or rehabilitation work.
  • Establishes collaborative restoration grants for nonprofits, tribal governments, local governments, academic institutions, private organizations, small businesses, rural job creation, biomass, biochar, nursery capacity, and tribal management.
  • Expands good-neighbor and stewardship contracting tools for Kings Canyon, Sequoia, Yosemite, BLM lands, and National Park Service lands.
  • Establishes a Giant Sequoia Emergency Protection Program and Fund through the National Park Foundation, National Forest Foundation, and Foundation for America's Public Lands.
  • Authorizes appropriations from fiscal years 2026 through 2032 and requires at least 90 percent of authorized funds to support Protection Projects and collaborative restoration grants.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a multi-agency giant sequoia protection framework for California public lands and national forests, including a shared stewardship agreement with California and the Tule River Tribe, codification of the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, a health and resiliency assessment, emergency hazardous-fuels and reforestation authorities, strike teams, restoration grants, insect monitoring, stewardship and good-neighbor contracting, a philanthropic emergency protection fund, and appropriations rising from $10 million in fiscal year 2026 to $40 million annually in fiscal years 2031 and 2032.

Key Policy Areas

Public Lands, Forestry, Wildfire, Tribal Affairs, Conservation

Primary Purpose

Creates a multi-agency giant sequoia protection framework for California public lands and national forests, including a shared stewardship agreement with California and the Tule River Tribe, codification of the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, a health and resiliency assessment, emergency hazardous-fuels and reforestation authorities, strike teams, restoration grants, insect monitoring, stewardship and good-neighbor contracting, a philanthropic emergency protection fund, and appropriations rising from $10 million in fiscal year 2026 to $40 million annually in fiscal years 2031 and 2032.

Policy Domains

Public Lands Forestry Wildfire Tribal Affairs Conservation

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Giant sequoia conservation projects
  • National Park Service
  • Forest Service
  • Bureau of Land Management
  • Tule River Tribe
  • California tribes
  • Rural communities near sequoia groves
  • Small forestry businesses
  • Tree nurseries
  • Biomass producers
  • Biochar producers
  • Academic institutions studying giant sequoias
  • Nonprofit conservation organizations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Forest Service: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Tree nurseries: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Tule River Tribe: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Biochar producers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Biomass producers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
California tribes: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
National Park Service: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Bureau of Land Management: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Small forestry businesses: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Giant sequoia conservation projects: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Nonprofit conservation organizations: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Rural communities near sequoia groves: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Academic institutions studying giant sequoias: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Secretary of the Interior
  • Secretary of Agriculture
  • Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition
  • Conservation advocacy groups
  • Environmental review participants
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Federal taxpayers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Secretary of Agriculture: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Secretary of the Interior: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Conservation advocacy groups: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Environmental review participants: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 17, 2026

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Mar 17, 2026

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy …

Mar 16, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Mar 16, 2026

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …

Mar 16, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Mar 16, 2026

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …

Mar 16, 2026

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2503-2509)

Mar 16, 2026

Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the …

Mar 12, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 466.

Mar 12, 2026

Committee on Agriculture discharged.

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Fishing & Forestry
61 mentions across 42 clauses
+33 positive -14 negative ?14 uncertain

Forest Service, Forest Service employees, Forest management contractors

Positive-direction: Forest management contractors, Forest restoration contractors, Forestry workforce, Grant recipients under section 9, Private forestry contractors, Seedling producers, Small forestry businesses

Negative-direction: Forest Service, Secretary of Agriculture

Tribal Nations
58 mentions across 42 clauses
+48 positive ?10 uncertain

California tribes, Tribal government conservation staff, Tribal governments

Civic Organizations
53 mentions across 31 clauses
+43 positive -10 negative

Conservation advocacy groups, Foundation for America's Public Lands, National Forest Foundation

Positive-direction: Foundation for America's Public Lands, National Forest Foundation, National Park Foundation, Nonprofit conservation organizations

Negative-direction: Conservation advocacy groups, Wilderness preservation advocates

General Public
51 mentions across 35 clauses
+9 positive -19 negative ?23 uncertain

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior employees, Federal land management agencies

National Park Service faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Federal land management agencies

Negative-direction: Bureau of Land Management, Secretary concerned for sequoia lands, Secretary of the Interior

Environment
50 mentions across 40 clauses
+35 positive -15 negative

Environmental review participants, Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, Giant sequoia conservation projects

Positive-direction: Giant sequoia conservation projects, Protection Projects for giant sequoias

Negative-direction: Environmental review participants, Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition

State & Local Government
27 mentions across 21 clauses
+18 positive ?9 uncertain

County governments near sequoia parks, County of Tulare, Governor of California

Education
18 mentions across 18 clauses
+18 positive

Academic forest scientists, Academic institutions studying giant sequoias, University of California Berkeley

Wildlife
10 mentions across 5 clauses
?10 uncertain

California spotted owl habitat, Pacific fisher habitat

13/13
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Lands Forestry Wildfire Tribal Affairs Conservation
Actor Mappings
"blm"
→ Bureau of Land Management
"nps"
→ National Park Service
"tribe"
→ Tule River Tribe
"interior"
→ Secretary of the Interior
"coalition"
→ Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition
"agriculture"
→ Secretary of Agriculture
"forest_service"
→ Forest Service

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology