HR2420-119

In Committee

Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Mar 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act is a large public-lands conservation bill for the Northern Rockies Bioregion. It designates wilderness additions and new wilderness components across the Greater Glacier/Northern Continental Divide, Greater Yellowstone, Greater Salmon/Selway, Greater Cabinet-Yaak-Selkirk, Greater Hells Canyon, Islands in the Sky, and biological connecting corridor landscapes. It directs administration under the Wilderness Act subject to valid existing rights, reserves sufficient federal water rights for wilderness purposes with a priority date of enactment, and requires Agriculture, Interior, and other federal officers to protect those rights in stream adjudications. It requires the Secretaries to accept donated grazing permits and permanently end grazing on donated allotments or portions. It designates about 2.9 million acres of federal land as biological connecting corridors for wildlife connectivity while protecting private landowners from compulsory compliance and allowing willing cooperative agreements, trades, and acquisitions. It exempts specified highways and roads. It designates about 1.023 million acres as wildland recovery areas and requires recovery plans to restore native vegetation, reduce invasive species, stabilize soils, improve water quality, remove fish barriers, and restore roadless and wild conditions. It requires an independent-scientist implementation report, an interagency team with public and private participants, GIS monitoring using satellite data, roadless land evaluation with temporary development prohibitions after evaluation, FOIA confidentiality for Tribal sacred-site and cultural information, possible Indian Self-Determination Act use, nonexclusive Tribal access for traditional cultural and religious purposes, temporary closures for private religious activity, and preservation of existing federal water rights.

Who Benefits and How

Wildlife conservation organizations benefit from wilderness designations, biological corridors, recovery areas, and roadless land evaluation across the Northern Rockies. Threatened species habitat benefits because the bill protects core ecosystems, migration connectivity, water quality, and restoration areas. Tribal governments benefit from confidentiality for sacred-site information, nonexclusive cultural access, temporary closure authority, and possible self-determination agreements. Backcountry recreation users benefit from added National Wilderness Preservation System lands and protected wildland character. Federal land managers benefit from statutory maps, legal descriptions, management rules, cooperative-agreement authority, and monitoring systems. Independent scientists benefit from a formal role in implementation reports and roadless land evaluations.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Forest Service land managers must administer new wilderness, corridors, recovery areas, water rights, grazing donations, and roadless evaluations. BLM field offices must manage designated public lands, corridor protections, land trades, acquisitions, and restoration obligations. Grazing permit holders lose grazing authorization if they donate permits or lease portions within protected areas. Timber, mining, oil, gas, roadbuilding, and ski-resort developers face development limits on designated wilderness, recovery, and evaluated roadless lands. Private landowners near corridors may face more federal negotiation interest, though the bill bars compulsory private-land compliance. Agriculture and Interior Secretaries must coordinate reports, GIS monitoring, water-right claims, cooperative agreements, and Tribal access protections.

Key Provisions

  • Designates wilderness additions across Greater Glacier, Greater Yellowstone, Greater Salmon/Selway, Cabinet-Yaak-Selkirk, Hells Canyon, Islands in the Sky, and corridor landscapes.
  • Designates about 2.9 million acres of federal land as biological connecting corridors while excluding private land from compulsory compliance.
  • Designates about 1.023 million acres as wildland recovery areas and requires restoration plans within three years.
  • Reserves federal water rights sufficient for wilderness purposes and preserves existing federal water rights.
  • Requires acceptance and termination of donated grazing permits or leases within wilderness, corridors, or recovery areas.
  • Creates independent-scientist reporting, an interagency monitoring team, satellite-based GIS monitoring, and roadless land evaluation.
  • Protects confidential Tribal sacred-site information from FOIA and preserves Tribal cultural and religious access to protected areas.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Designates major Northern Rockies wilderness additions, biological connecting corridors, wildland recovery areas, water rights, grazing-permit donation rules, interagency monitoring, roadless land evaluation, Tribal confidentiality and access protections, and implementation reporting across Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming.

Key Policy Areas

Public Lands, Conservation, Tribal Affairs

Primary Purpose

Designates major Northern Rockies wilderness additions, biological connecting corridors, wildland recovery areas, water rights, grazing-permit donation rules, interagency monitoring, roadless land evaluation, Tribal confidentiality and access protections, and implementation reporting across Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming.

Policy Domains

Public Lands Conservation Tribal Affairs

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Wildlife conservation organizations
  • Threatened species habitat
  • Tribal governments
  • Backcountry recreation users
  • Federal land managers
  • Independent scientists
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Tribal governments: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Federal land managers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Independent scientists: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Threatened species habitat: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Backcountry recreation users: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Wildlife conservation organizations: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Forest Service land managers
  • BLM field offices
  • Grazing permit holders
  • Resource extraction developers
  • Private landowners near corridors
  • Agriculture and Interior Secretaries
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
BLM field offices: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Grazing permit holders: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Forest Service land managers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Resource extraction developers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Private landowners near corridors: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Agriculture and Interior Secretaries: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 27, 2025

Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania (for herself, Ms. Meng, Mr. Cohen, …

Mar 27, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Mar 27, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

General Public
104 mentions across 26 clauses
+52 positive ?52 uncertain

Backcountry recreation users, Independent scientists, Private landowners near corridors

Government
78 mentions across 26 clauses
-52 negative ?26 uncertain

BLM field offices, Forest Service land managers, Tribal governments

Agriculture
26 mentions across 26 clauses
?26 uncertain

Grazing permit holders

Energy
26 mentions across 26 clauses
-26 negative

Resource extraction developers

26/34
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Lands Conservation Tribal Affairs

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology